University citation distributions

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 67, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 2790-2804

  Perianes Rodriguez, Antonio ^a   Ruiz Castillo, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

bibliographic citations; citation analysis; scientometrics

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATIONS; CITATION ANALYSIS; CITATION DISTRIBUTION; CITATION IMPACT; FUNCTIONAL FORMS; INTERMEDIATE PARTS; NORMALIZATION FACTORS; SCIENTOMETRICS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

CITATION ANALYSIS; MODEL; SPEECH; UNIVERSITY; WEB OF SCIENCE;

EID: 84991255022     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23619     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 40–49.
2. Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2012). The Measurement of Scientific Excellence Around the World. Working Paper, Economic Series 12-08, Universidad Carlos III Retrieved from http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/13896
3. Albarrán, P., Crespo, J., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011a). The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics, 88, 385–397.
4. Albarrán, P., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011b). The measurement of low- and high-impact in citation distributions: Technical results. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 48–63.
5. Albarrán, P., Perianes-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2015). Differences in citation impact across countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66, 512–525.
6. Brzezinski, M. (2015). Power laws in citation distributions: Evidence from Scopus. Scientometrics, 103, 213–228.
7. Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, A., & Chakrabarty, B.K. (2014). Universality of citation distributions for academic institutions and journals, posted September 29, ArXiv:1409.8029 [physics.soc-ph].
8. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., & Newman, M.E.J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51, 661–703.
9. Crespo, J.A., Li, Y., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013). The measurement of the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices across scientific fields. PLoS ONE, 8, e58727.
10. Crespo, J.A., Herranz, N., Li, Y., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014). The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the Web of Science subject category level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65, 1244–1256.
11. Glänzel, W. (2007). Characteristic scores and scales: A bibliometric analysis of subject characteristics based on long-term citation observation. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 92–102.
12. Groeneveld, R.A., & Meeden, G. (1984). Measuring skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician, 33, 391–399.
13. Herranz, N., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2012). Multiplicative and fractional strategies when journals are assigned to several sub-fields. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2195–2205.
14. Leydesdorff, L., Radicchi, F., Bornmann, L., Castellano, C., & de Nooye, W. (2012). Field-normalized impact factors: A comparison of rescaling versus fractionally counted ifs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27, 292–306.
15. Li, Y., Castellano, C., Radicchi, F., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2013). Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 746–755.
16. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014). An alternative to field-normalization in the aggregation of heterogeneous scientific fields. Working Paper 14-25, Departamento de Economía, Universidad Carlos III Retrieved from http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/19812
17. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2015). Within- and between-department variability in individual productivity. The case of economics. Scientometrics, 102, 1497–1520.
18. Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2012). A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions. PLoS ONE, 7, e33833.
19. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 17268–17272.
20. Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2014). The comparison of classification-system-based normalization procedures with source normalization alternatives in Waltman and Van Eck (2013). Journal of Informetrics, 8, 25–28.
21. Ruiz-Castillo, J., & Costas, R. (2014). The skewness of scientific productivity. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 917–934.
22. Ruiz-Castillo, J., & Waltman, L. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science. Journal of Informetrics, 9, 102–117.
23. Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1987). Subject field characteristic citation scores and scales for assessing research performance. Scientometrics, 12, 267–291.
24. Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2014). Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 824–839.
25. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2378–2392.
26. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2013). A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 7, 833–849.
27. Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E.C.M., Tijssen, R.J.W., Van Eck, N.J., … Wouters, P. (2012a). The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2419–2432.
28. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (2012b). Universality of citation distributions revisited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 72–77.