The convergence paradigm, ecological modelling, and context-dependent pitch perception

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 133-153

  Leman, Marc ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991253159     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298219708570722     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alho, K., 1995. Cerebral generator: of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16(1): 38–51.
2. Arbib, M., ed. 1995a. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Arbib, M., 1995b. “ Schema theory ”. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Edited by: Arbib, M., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Bruhn, H., 1988. Harmonielehre als Grammatik der Musik, München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
5. Carreras, F., and Lean, M., 1996. “ Distributed parallel architectures for the simulation of cognitive models in a realistic environment ”. In Parallel Computing: State-of-the Art Perspective — Proceedings of the International Conference PARCO95, Gent, 19–22 September 1995, Edited by: D'Hollander, E., Joubert, G., Peters, F., and Trystram, D., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Chailley, J., 1967. Expliquer l'Harmonie, Paris: Éditions Rencontre.
7. Clark, A., 1995. “ Brain theory and connectionism ”. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Edited by: Arbib, M., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Cohen, D., and Erez, A., 1991. Event-related-potential measurements of cognitive components in response to pitch patterns. Music Perception, 8(4): 405–430.
9. Cohen, D., Granot, R., Pratt, H., and Barneah, A., 1993. Cognitive meanings of musical elements as disclosed by event-related potential (ERP) and verbal experiments. Music Perception, 11(2): 153–184.
10. Cosi, P., Poli, G.-D., and Lauzzana, G., 1994. Auditory modelling and self-organizing neural networks for timbre classification. Journal of New Music Research, 23(1): 71–98.
11. Desain, P., and Honing, H., 1992. Music, Mind and Machine: Studies in Computer Music, Music Cognition and Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam: Thesis publishers.
12. Elschek, O., 1996. Musiktheoretische Paradigmenbildung und ihre diziplinären Konsequenzen in der Musikforschung. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, 3(1): 87–124.
13. De Poli, G., and Prandoni, P., 1997. Sonological models for timbre characterization. Journal of New Music Research, 26
14. Gabrielsson, A., ed. 1987. Action and Perception in Rhythm and Music, Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
15. Grey, J. M., 1977. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5): 1270–1277.
16. Grey, J. M., 1978. Timbre discrimination in musical patterns. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64: 467–472.
17. Grey, J. M., and Gordon, J. W., 1978. Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(5): 1493–1500.
18. Helmholtz, H., 1863/1968. Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik, Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.
19. Iverson, P., and Krumhansl, C., 1993. Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(5): 2595–2603.
20. Janata, P., 1995. ERP measures assay the degree of expectancy violation of harmonic contexts in music. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2): 153–164.
21. Janata, P., and Petsche, H., 1993. Spectral analysis of the EEG as a tool for evaluating expectancy violations of musical contexts. Music Perception, 10(3): 281–304.
22. Kandel, E., 1991. “ Brain and behavior ”. In Principles of Neural Science, (Third Edition), Edited by: Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., and Jessell, T., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
23. Kendall, R., and Carterette, E., 1991. Perceptual scaling of simultaneous wind instrument timbres. Music Perception, 8(4): 369–404.
24. Köhler, W., 1924. Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand, Verlag der Philosophischen Akademie Erlangen.
25. Kohonen, T., 1995. Self-Organizing Maps, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
26. Krumhansl, C., 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch, New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Krumhansl, C., and Shepard, R. N., 1979. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5: 579–594.
28. Langner, G., 1997. Temporal processing of pitch in the auditory system. Journal of New Music Research, 26 (this issue)
29. Lehnert, W., 1984. “ Paradigmatic issues in cognitive science ”. In Method and Tactics in Cognitive Science, Edited by: Kintsch, W., Miller, J., and Poison, P. G., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Leman, M., 1991. “ The ontogenesis of tonal semantics: results of a computer study ”. In Music and Connectionism, Edited by: Todd, P., and Loy, G., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31. Leman, M., 1993. “ Symbolic and subsymbolic description of music ”. In Music Processing, Edited by: Haus, G., Madison, Wisconsin: Oxford University Press, A-R Editions.
32. Leman, M., 1994. Schema-based tone center recognition of musical signals. Journal of New Music Research, 23(2): 169–203.
33. Leman, M., 1995. Music and Schema Theory — Cognitive Foundations of Systematic Musicology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
34. Leman, M., ed. 1997. Music, Gestalt and Computing — Studies in Cognitive and Systematic Musicology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
35. Leman, M., and Carreras, F., Simulation of listening to Bach's Wohltemperiertes Klavier. Proceedings of the XI Colloquium on Musical Informatics. Bologna. Edited by: Finarelli, L., and Regazzi, F., pp. 173–176. AIMI, Associazione di Informatica Musicale Italiana.
36. Léman, M., and Carreras, F., 1996. “ The self-organization of stable perceptual maps in a realistic musical environment ”. In Proceedings of the Journées d'Informatique Musicale 17–18 mai 1996, Edited by: Assayah, G., Caen. Univ. de Caen, IRCAM.
37. Leman, M., and Carreras, F., 1997. “ Schema and Gestalt: testing the hypothesis of psychoneural isomorphism by computer simulation ”. In Music, Gestalt, and Computing — Studies in Cognitive and Systematic Musicology, Edited by: Leman, M., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
38. Martin, J., 1991. “ The collective electrical behavior of cortical neurons: The electroencephalogram and the mechanisms of epilepsy ”. In Principles of Neural Science (Third Edition), Edited by: Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., and Jessell, T., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39. Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M.-J., 1991. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computermodel of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(6): 28662894
40. Moisala, P., 1995. Cognitive study of music as culture—basic premises for cognitive ethno-musicology. Journal of New Music Research, 24(1): 8–20.
41. Näätänen, R., 1995. The mismatch negativity: A powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear and Hearing, 16(1): 6–18.
42. Näätänen, R., Ilmoniemi, R., and Alho, K., 1994. Magnetoencephalography in studies of human cognitive brain function. Trends in Neurosciences, 17(9): 389–395.
43. Petsche, H., von Stein, A., and Filz, O., 1996. EEG aspects of mentally playing an instrument. Cognitive Brain Research, 3: 115–123.
44. Plomp, R., 1976. Aspects of Tone Sensation, London: Academic Press.
45. Pöppel, E., 1996. “ Reconstruction of subjective time on the basis of a hierarchically organized processing system ”. In Time, Internal Clocks and Movement, Edited by: Passtor, M., and Artieda, J., Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46. Rameau, J.-P., 1722/1965. Traité de l'Harmonie, New York: Broude Brothers.
47. Rapoport, E., 1996. Emotional expression code in opera and lied singing. Journal of New Music Research, 25(2): 109–149.
48. Ru, P., and Shamma, S., 1997. Representation of musical timbre in the auditory cortex. Journal of New Music Research, 26 (this issue)
49. Samson, S., and Zatorre, R., 1994. “ Psychologie de la musique ”. In Psychologie de la Musique, Edited by: Zenatti, A., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
50. Scheerer, E., 1994. Psychoneural isomorphism: historical background and current relevance. Philosophical Psychology, 7(2): 183–210.
51. Sharkey, A., and Sharkey, N., 1995. “ Cognitive modeling: Psychology and connectionism ”. In The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, Edited by: Arbib, M., Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
52. Shepard, R. N., 1982. “ Structural representations of musical pitch ”. In The psychology of music, Edited by: Deutsch, D., New York: Academic Press.
53. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., and Seewann, M., 1982a. Algorithm for extraction of pitch and pitch salience from complex tonal signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(3): 679–688.
54. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., and Seewann, M., 1982b. Pitch of complex signals according to virtual-pitch theory: tests, examples, and predictions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(3): 671–628.
55. Tervaniemi, M., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Sams, M., and Näätänen, R., 1993. Absolute pitch and event-related brain potentials. Music Perception, 10(3): 305–316.
56. Todd, N., 1992. The dynamics of dynamics: a model of musical expression. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(6): 3540–3550.
57. Todd, N., 1994. The auditory “primal sketch”: A multiscale model of rhythmic grouping. Journal of New Music Research, 23(1): 25–70.
58. Toga, A., and Mazziotta, J., eds. 1996. Brain Mapping, London: Academic Press.
59. Toiviainen, P., 1996. Timbre maps, auditory images, and distance metrics. Journal of New Music Research, 25(1): 1–30.
60. Toiviainen, P., Kaipainen, M., and Louhivuori, J., 1995. Musical timbre: Similarity ratings correlate with computational feature space distances. Journal of New Music Research, 24(3): 282–298.
61. Van Immersed, L., and Martens, J.-P., 1992. Pitch and voiced/unvoiced determination with an auditory model. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(6): 3511–3526.
62. Zatorre, R., Halpern, A., Perry, D., Meyer, E., and Evans, A., 1996. Hearing in the mind's ear: a PET investigation of musical imagery and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1): 29–46.
63. Zwicker, E., and Fasti, H., 1990. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
64. Sound examples are available in the JNMR Electronic Appendix (EA) which can be found on the WWW at http://www.swets.nl/jnmr/jnmr.html