Cue Abstraction, Paradigmatic Analysis and Information Dynamics: Towards Music Analysis by Cognitive Model

Musicae Scientiae

Volumn 14, Issue 2_suppl, 2010, Pages 307-331

  Wiggins, Geraint A ^a  

^a Centre for Cognition   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991214389     PISSN: 10298649     EISSN: 20454147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10298649100140S217     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cleeremans A., & Dienes Z., (2008). Computational models of implicit learning. In Sun R., (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (pp. 396–421). Cambridge University Press.
2. Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.
3. Conklin D., & Witten I. H., (1995). Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. Journal of New Music Research, 24, 51–73.
4. Deliège I., (1987). Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff's grouping preference rules. Music Perception, 4, 325–360.
5. Deliège I., (1996). Cue abstraction as a component of categorisation processes in music listening. Psychology of Music, 24(2), 131–156.
6. Deliège I., (2001). Introduction: Similarity perception categorization cue abstraction. Music Perception, 18(3), 233–243.
7. Honing H. (2006). Computational modeling of music cognition: A case study on model selection. Music Perception, 23(5), 365–376.
8. Landis J., & Koch G. G., (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
9. Narmour E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realistation model. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Nattiez J.-J., (1975). Fondements d'une sémiologie de la musique. Paris: Union Générale d'Editions.
11. Pearce M. T., (2005). The construction and evaluation of statistical models of melodic structure in music perception and composition. PhD thesis, Department of Computing, City University, London, UK.
12. Pearce M. T., Herrojo Ruiz M., Kapasi S., Wiggins G. A., & Bhattacharya J., (2010). Unsupervised statistical learning underpins computational, behavioural and neural manifestations of musical expectation. NeuroImage, 50(1), 303–314.
13. Pearce M. T., Müllensiefen D., & Wiggins G. A., (2008). Melodic segmentation: A new method and a framework for model comparison. In Proceedings of ISMIR 2008.
14. Pearce M. T., & Wiggins G. A., (2006). Expectation in melody: The influence of context and learning. Music Perception, 23(5), 377–406.
15. Potter K., Wiggins G. A., & Pearce M. T., (2007). Towards greater objectivity in music theory: Information-dynamic analysis of minimalist music. Musicae Scientiae, 11(2), 295–324.
16. Ruwet N. (1972). Language, musique, poésie. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
17. Shannon C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623-56.
18. Smaill A., Wiggins G. A., & Harris M., (1993). Hierarchical music representation for analysis and composition. Computers and the Humanities, 27, 7–17.
19. Wiggins G. A., (2007). Models of musical similarity. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum 4a, pages 315–337.
20. Wiggins G. A., (2010). Computer models of (music) cognition. In Rebuschat P., Rohrmeier M., Cross I., & Hawkins J., (Eds.), Language and Music as Cognitive Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Wiggins G. A., Pearce M. T., & Müllensiefen D., (2009). Computational modelling of music cognition and musical creativity. In Dean R., (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Computer Music and Digital Sound Culture. Oxford University Press.