Does quantity make a difference?

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 577-583

  Van Den Besselaar, Peter ^a   Sandstrom, Ulf ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

CITED PAPERS; HIGHLY-CITED PAPERS; INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH EVALUATION; SWEDISHS;

PRODUCTIVITY;

EID: 84991098081     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bosquet, C. & Combes, P-P. (2013). Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records. Scientometrics, 97: 831-857.
2. Braun, T., Glanzel, W. & Schubert, A. (1990). Publication productivity: from frequency distributions to scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science, 16: 37-44.
3. Dijstelbloem, H., Huisman, F., Miedema, F. & Mijnhardt, W. (2014). Science in Transition Status Report: Debate, Progress and Recommendations. http://www.scienceintransition.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Science-in-Transition-Status-Report-June-2014.pdf.
4. Glanzel, W. (2011). The application of characteristic scores and scales to the evaluation and ranking of scientific journal. Journal of Information Science, 37(1): 40-48.
5. Glanzel, W. & Schubert, A. (1988). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14: 123-127.
6. Gurney, T., Horlings, E. & van den Besselaar, P. Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators. Scientometrics, 91: 435-449.
7. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46): 1656916572.
8. Klavans, R. & Boyack, R.W. (2015). Scientific superstars and their effect on the evolution of science. http://www.enid-europe.org/conference/abstract%20pdf/Klavans-Boyack-superstars.pdf.
9. Koski, T., Sandstrom, E. & Sandstrom, U. (2011). Estimating research productivity from a zero-truncated distribution. Paper to the 2011 ISSI Conference in Durban
10. Price, D.J.S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
11. Sandstrom, U. & Sandstrom, E. (2009). The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions. Research Evaluation, 18(3): 243-250
12. Sandstrom, U. & van den Besselaar, P. (2015). Before the prize: Nobel Prize laureates recognition by their scientific community. Manuscript in preparation
13. Sandstrom, U. & Wold, A. (2015). Centres of Excellence: reward for gender or top-level research? In B.Bjorkman & B. Fjaestad (Eds.). Thinking Ahead: Research, Funding and the Future (pp. 69-91).Stockholm, Makadam Publ.
14. Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. New York: Cambridge Univ Press. [Reprinted 2008].
15. Separating the articles of authors with the same name. Scientometrics 72 (2): 281-290. DOI: 10.1007/slll92-007-1730-z.
16. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M. & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342, 468-472.
17. Zuckerman, H. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32 (3): 391-403.