Stopped sum models for citation data

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 184-194

  Low, Wan Jing ^a   Wilson, Paul ^a   Thelwall, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); INFORMATION SCIENCE; VOLTAGE MEASUREMENT;

AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; CITATION ANALYSIS; CITATION DATA; LOG-NORMAL; LOG-NORMAL MODEL; NEGATIVE BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; STANDARD ERRORS; STATISTICAL MODELING;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

EID: 84991056852     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bookstein, A. (2001). Implications of ambiguity for scientometric measurement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 74-79. doi:10.1002/1532-2890(2000)52:1 3.0.CO;2-C
2. Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 11-18.
3. Bozdogan, H. (2000). Akaike's Information Criterion and recent developments in information complexity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 62-91. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1277
4. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical informationtheoretic approach (2nd ed., p. 520). Springer.
5. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51(4), 661-703. doi:10.1137/070710111
6. De Solla Price, D. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306. doi:10.1002/asi.4630270505
7. Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861-873. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.006
8. Dodge, Y. (2003). The Oxford dictionary of statistical terms. (S. D. Cox, D. Commenges, A. Davison, P. Solomon, & S. Wilson, Eds.) (1st ed., p. 498). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Hesse, M. B. (1953). Models in Physics. The British J. for the Philosophy of Science, 4(15), 198-214.
10. Johnson, N. L., Kemp, A. W., & Kotz, S. (2005). Univariate discrete distribution (3rd ed., p. 672). Wiley-Interscience.
11. Maurseth, P. B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Knowledge spillovers in Europe: A patent citations analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 531-545. doi:10.1111/1467-9442.00300
12. Neyman, J. (1939). On a new class of "contagious" distributions, applicable in entomology and bacteriology. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10(1), 35-57. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732245
13. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
14. Ruppert, D. (2011). Statistics and data analysis for financial engineering (p. 638). New York: Springer.
15. Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2014a). Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 824-839. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.001
16. Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2014b). Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 963-971. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.011
17. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (Fourth.). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4