Outlining the scientific activity profile of researchers in the social sciences and humanities in Spain: The case of CSIC

Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 548-553

  Díaz Faes, Adrián A ^a   Bordons, María ^a   Van Leeuwen, Thed ^b   Galindo, Ma Purificación ^c  

^a CSIC   (Spain)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMANITIES COMPUTING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SERVICES; PUBLISHING; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; HUMANITIES RESEARCHERS; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84991056186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Cote, G., Lariviere, V. & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329-342. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z.
2. Giménez-Toledo, E., Tejada-Artigas, C. & Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2013). Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: results of a survey. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 64-77.doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs036
3. Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473-496). Dordrecht, The Nederlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9-22.
4. van Leeuwen, T.N. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: a problematic relationship? Bibliometrie-Praxis und Forschung, 2013, 1-18. Retrieved June 15, 2015 from: http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/viewFile/173/215
5. Mañana-Rodriguez, J. & Giménez-Toledo, E. (2013). Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: a quantitative approach for the Spanish case. Scientometrics, 94, 893-910. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0838-y
6. Martin, B., Tang, P., Morgan, M., Glanzel, W., Hornbostel, S., Lauer, G., et al. (2010). Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities-A European scoping project. Research report produced for DFG, ESRC, AHRC, NWO, ANR and ESF.
7. Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6(1), 22-28.
8. Sivertsen, G. & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567-575. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3.
9. Torres-Salinas, D, Bordons, M., Giménez, E., Delgado, E., Jiménez, E. & Sanz, E. (2010). Clasificación integrada de revistas científicas (CIRC): propuesta de categorización de las revistas en ciencias sociales y humanas. El Profesional de la Información, 19(6), 675-683.
10. WTI2 2014 Scholarly Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities and Their Relationship with Research Assessment. Science, Technology & Innovation Indicators 2014. Thematic Paper 2, 1-26 http://dialogic.nl/documents/other/sti2-themepaper2.pdf