Genomics for phenotype prediction and management purposes

Animal Frontiers

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 65-72

  Yin, Tong ^a   König, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cow calibration groups; Prediction of phenotypes; Within herd selection strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991033588     PISSN: 21606056     EISSN: 21606064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/af.2016-0010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Becker-Scalez, D., S. König, and T. Yin. 2015. Genomic analysis of longitudinal data using random regression coefficients. In: Proc. Annual Meeting of DGfZ und GfT, 16-17 Sept. 2015, Berlin
2. Bohmanova, J., I. Misztal, and J.B. Cole. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat atress. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1947-1956. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-513
3. Burgueno, J., G. de los Campos, K. Weigel, and J. Crossa. 2012. Genomic prediction of breeding values when modeling genotype x environment interaction using pedigree and dense molecular markers. Crop Sci. 52:707-719. doi:10.2135/ cropsci2011.06.0299
4. Calus, M.P.L., D.P. Berry, G. Banos, G., Y. de Haas, and R.F. Veerkamp. 2013a. Genomic selection: The option for new robustness traits? Adv. Anim. Biosci. 4(3):618-625. doi:10.1017/S2040470013000186
5. Calus, M.P.L., Y. de Haas, M. Psczola, and R.F. Veerkamp. 2013b. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle. Animal 2(7):183-191. doi:10.1017/S1751731112001450
6. Chesnai, J.P. 2012. Genotyping heifers to maximize profits. Progr. Dairyman 2:18-19
7. Dekkers, J.C. 2007. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124:331-341. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00701.x
8. DeStefano, A.L., and I. Hoeschele. 1992. Utilization of dominance through mate allocation strategies. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1680-1690. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77925-9
9. Ertl, J., A. Legarra, Z.G. Vitecia, L. Varona, C. Edel, R. Emmerling, and K.-U. Götz. 2014. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 66:14
10. Freyer, G., S. König, B. Fischer, U. Bergfeld, and B.G. Cassell. 2008. Invited review: Crossbreeding in dairy cattle form a German perspective of the past and today. J. Dairy Sci. 91:3725-3743. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1287
11. Gause, G.F. 1947. Problems of evolution. Trans. Conn. Acad. Sci. 37:17-68
12. Goddard, M. 2009. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica (The Hague) 136:245-257
13. González-Recio, O., and S. Forni. 2011. Genome-wide prediction of discrete traits using Baysesian regressions and machine learning. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43:7. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-43-7
14. González-Recio, O., J.E. Pryce, M. Haile-Mariam, and B.J. Hayes. 2014a. Incorporating heifer feed efficiency in the Australian selection index using genomic selection. J. Dairy Sci. 97:3883-3893. doi:10.3168/jds.2013-7515
15. González-Recio, O., G.J.M. Rosa, and D. Gianola. 2014b. Machine learning methods and predictive ability metrics for genome-wide prediction of complex traits. Livest. Sci. 166:217-231. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.036
16. Kadri, N.K., G. Sahana, C. Charlier, T. Iso-Touru, B. Guldbrandtsen, L. Karim, U. Sander Nielsen et al. 2014. A 660-Kb deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production segregates at high frequency in Nordic Red cattle: Additional evidence for the common occurrence of balancing selection in livestock. PLoS Genet. 10(1):e1004049. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004049
17. König, S., F. Bosselmann, U.U.v. Borstel, and H. Simianer. 2007. Genetic analyses of traits affecting the success of embryo transfer in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 90:3945-3954. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0089
18. König, S., and H. Simianer. 2006. Approaches to the management of inbreeding and relationship in the German Holstein dairy cattle population. Livest. Sci. 103:40-53. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2005.12.009
19. König, S., H. Simianer, and A. Willam. 2009. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 92:382-391. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1310
20. König, S., and H.H. Swalve. 2009. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 92:5292-5303. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2232
21. Lee, S.H., J.H.J. van der Werf, B.J. Hayes, M.E. Goddard, and P.M. Visscher. 2008. Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. PLoS Genet. 4(10):E1000231 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000231. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000231
22. Luan, T., J.A. Wooliams, S. Lien, M. Kent, M. Svendsen, and T.H.E. Meuwissen. 2009. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian Red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics 183:1119-1126. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.107391
23. Lund, M.S., A.P.W. de Roos, A.G. de Vries, T. Druet, V. Ducrocq, S. Fritz, F. Guillaume, B. Gulbrandtsen, Z. Liu, R. Reents, C. Schrooten, M. Seefried, and G. Su. 2010. Improving genomic prediction by EuroGenomics collaboration. In: Proc. 9th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany, 1-6 August. Abstract no. 880
24. Meuwissen, T.H.E. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 1997:934-940
25. Meuwissen, T.H.E., B. Hayes, and M.E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829
26. Miztal, I., L. Varona, M. Culbertson, J.K. Bertrand, J. Mabry, T.J. Lawlor, C.P. Van Tassel, and N. Gengler. 1998. Studies on the value of incorporating the effect of dominance in genetic evaluations of dairy cattle, beef cattle and swine. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2:227-233
27. Naderi, S., T. Yin, and S. König. 2014. Application of random forest methodology for genomic selection of disease traits in dairy cattle. In: Proc. Annual Meeting of DGfZ und GfT, 17-18 Sept. 2015, Dummerstorf
28. Ober, U., J.F. Ayroles, E.A. Stone, S. Richards, D. Zhu, R.A. Gibbs, C. Stricker, D. Gianola, M. Schlather, T.F.C. Mackay, and H. Simianer. 2012. Using wholegenome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 8(5):e1002685 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685
29. Patry, C., and V. Ducrocq. 2009. Bias due to genomic selection. Interb. Bull. 40:172-177
30. Pausch, H., S. Kölle, C. Wurmser, H. Schwarzenbacher, R. Emmerling, S. Jansen, M. Trottmann, C. Fuerst, K.-U. Götz, and R. Fries. 2014. A nonsense mutation in TMEM95 encoding a nondescript transmembrane protein causes idiopathic male subfertility in cattle. PLoS Genet. 10(1):e1004044 10.1371/journal. pgen.1004044. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004044
31. Pérez-Cabal, M.A., A.I. Vazquez, D. Gianola, G.J. Rosa, and K.A. Weigel. 2012. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction in a dairy cattle population using different cross-validation layouts. Front. Genet. 3:27. doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00027
32. Pimentel, E.C.G., and S. König. 2012. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef. J. Anim. Sci. 90:3418-3426. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-5005
33. Pimentel, E., M. Wensch-Dorendorf, S. König, and H.H. Swalve. 2013. Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped ani-mals in populations of varying genetic architecture. Genet. Sel. Evol. 45:12. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-45-12
34. Pong-Wong, R., and G.A. Hadjipavlou. 2010. A two-step approach combining the Gompertz growth with genomic selection for longitudinal data. BMC Proc. 4:4
35. Pryce, J.E., and B.J. Hayes. 2011. A review of how dairy farmers can use and profit from genomic technologies. Anim. Prod. Sci. 52:180-184. doi:10.1071/AN11172
36. Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485. doi:10.2307/2527750
37. Santos, D.J., S.A. Boison, A.T. Utsunomya, M.G.C.D. Peixota, H. Tonhati, J. Sölkner, and M.V. da Silva. 2010. An approach to genomic analysis of longitudinal data using random regressions. In: Proc. of the 10th Word Congress of Genet. Appl. to Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany
38. Schaeffer, L.R. 2006. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123:218-223. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x
39. Schefers, J.M., and K.A. Weigel. 2012. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Integration of DNA testing into breeding programs. Anim. Front. 2(1):4-9. doi:10.2527/af.2011-0032
40. Schierenbeck, S., E.C.G. Pimentel, M. Tietze, J. Körte, R. Reents, F. Reinhard, H. Simianer, and S. König. 2011. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships. J. Dairy Sci. 94:6143-6152. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4574
41. Silva, F.F., M.D.V. de Resende, G.S. Rocha, D.A.S. Duarte, P.L. Lopes, O.J.B. Brustolini, S. Thus, J.M.S. Viana, and S.E.F. Guimares. 2013. Genomic growth curves of an outbred pig population. Gent. Mol. Biol. 36(4):520-527
42. Sonesson, A.K., and T.H.E. Meuwissen. 2000. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet. Sel. Evol. 32:231-248. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-32-3-231
43. Sorensen, A.C., and M.K. Sorensen. 2010. Genotyping both males and females is favorable in genomic dairy cattle breeding schemes. In: Proc. 9th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Leipzig, Germany, 1-6 Aug. Abstract no. 720
44. Swalve, H.H. 2014. Use of high density marker data-the role of individual functional mutations. In: Proc. 10th Wld. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Vancouver, Canada, 17 Aug
45. Toro, M.A., and L. Varona. 2010. A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 42:33. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-33
46. VanRaden, P.M., K.M. Olson, D.J. Null, and J.L. Hutchison. 2011. Harmful recessive effects on fertility detected by absence of homozygous haplotypes. J. Dairy Sci. 94:6153-6161. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4624
47. Van Tassel, C.P., and L.D. Van Vleck. 1991. Estimates of genetic selection differentials and generation intervals for four paths of selection. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1078-1086. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78258-1
48. Varona, L., I. Misztal, J.K. Bertrand, and T.J. Lawlor. 1998. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1126-1135. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75675-9
49. Weigel, K.A., P.C. Hoffman, W. Herring, and T.J. Lawlor. 2012. Potential gains in lifetime net merit from genomic testing of cows, heifers, and calves on commercial dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 95:2215-2225. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4877
50. Wiggans, G.R., P.M. vanRaden, and T.A. Cooper. 2011. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: Past, present, future. J. Dairy Sci. 94:3202-3211. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3866
51. Wiggans, G.R., T.A. Cooper, P.M. VanRaden, K.M. Olson, and M.E. Tooker. 2012. Use of the Illumina Bovine 3K Bead chip in dairy genomic evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 95:1552-1558. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4985
52. Wray, N.R., M.E. Goddard, and P.M. Visscher. 2007. Prediction of invidual genetic risk to disease from genome-wide association studies. Genome Res. 17:1520-1528. doi:10.1101/gr.6665407
53. Yin, T., E.C.G. Pimentel, U. König v. Borstel, and S. König. 2014. Strategy for the simulation and analysis of longitudinal phenotypic and genomic data in the context of a temperature x humidity-dependent covariate. J. Dairy Sci. 97:2444-2454