Mining triadic closure patterns in social networks

WWW 2014 Companion - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 499-504

  Huang, Hong ^a   Tang, Jie ^b   Wu, Sen ^c   Liu, Lu ^d   Fu, Xiaoming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Predictive model; Social influence; Social network

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DYNAMIC NETWORK; MICROBLOGGING; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; PREDICTIVE MODELING; PROBABILISTIC GRAPHICAL MODELS; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TRIADIC CLOSURES; UNIFIED MODELING;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84991013997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2567948.2576940     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In KDD'06, pages 44-54, 2006.
2. P. Grindrod, D. J. Higham, and M. C. Parsons. Bistability through triadic closure. Internet Mathematics, pages 402-423, 2012.
3. M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The weka data mining software: An update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 11(1):10-18, 2009.
4. J. M. Hammersley and P. Clifford. Markov field on finite graphs and lattices. Unpublished manuscript, 1971.
5. J. Hopcroft, T. Lou, and J. Tang. Who will follow you back? reciprocal relationship prediction. In CIKM'11, pages 1137-1146, 2011.
6. B. Huberman, D. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. 2008.
7. A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In WebKDD'07, pages 56-65, 2007.
8. G. Kossinets and D. J. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science, 311(5757):88-90, 2006.
9. H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW'10, pages 591-600, 2010.
10. T. Lou and J. Tang. Mining structural hole spanners through information diffusion in social networks. In WWW'13, pages 837-848, 2013.
11. T. Lou, J. Tang, J. Hopcroft, Z. Fang, and X. Ding. Learning to predict reciprocity and triadic closure in social networks. TKDD, 2013.
12. M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. Twittermonitor: Trend detection over the twitter stream. In SIGMOD'10, pages 1155-1158, 2010.
13. R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, pages 824-827, 2002.
14. T. Opsahl. Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients. Social Networks, 2011.
15. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. 1999.
16. D. M. Romero and J. M. Kleinberg. The directed closure process in hybrid social-information networks, with an analysis of link formation on twitter. In ICWSM'10, 2010.
17. T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In WWW'10, pages 851-860, 2010.
18. J. Tang, S. Wu, and J. Sun. Confluence: Conformity influence in large social networks. In KDD'13, pages 347-355, 2013.
19. S. Wasserman. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press, 1994.
20. J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He. Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. In WSDM'10, pages 261-270, 2010.