Demand generation activities and modern contraceptive use in urban areas of four countries: A longitudinal evaluation

Global Health Science and Practice

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 410-426

  Speizer, Ilene S ^a,b   Corroon, Meghan ^b   Calhoun, Lisa ^b   Lance, Peter ^b   Montana, Livia ^c   Nanda, Priya ^d   Guilkey, David ^b,e  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL   (United States)

^c HARVARD CENTER FOR POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (United States)

^d International Center for Research on Women   (India)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIA; KENYA; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NIGERIA; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC HEALTH; SENEGAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INDIA; KENYA; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NIGERIA; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SENEGAL; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84991000725     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2169575X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00109     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A., Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006; 368(9549):1810-1827.
2. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H., Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012; 380(9837):149-156.
3. Ali M, Seuc A, Rahimi A., Festin M, Temmerman M. A global research agenda for family planning: results of an exercise for setting research priorities. Bull World Health Organ. 2014; 92(2):93-98.
4. Cates W. Family planning: the essential link to achieving all eight Millennium Development Goals. Contraception. 2010; 81(6):460-461.
5. Reynolds HW, Janowitz B, Wilcher R., Cates W. Contraception to prevent HIV-positive births: current contribution and potential cost savings in PEPFAR countries. Sex Transm Infect. 2008; (Suppl 2)::ii49-ii53.
6. Brown W, Druce N, Bunting J., Radloff S, Koroma D, Gupta S., et al. Developing the "120 by 20" goal for the Global FP2020 Initiative. Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45(1):73-84.
7. Mwaikambo L, Speizer IS, Schurmann A, Morgan G., Fikree F. What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review. Stud Fam Plann. 2011; 42(2):67-82.
8. Bauman KE. The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(4):666-669.
9. Rahman M, DaVanzo J, Razzaque A. Do better family planning services reduce abortion in Bangladesh? Lancet. 2001; 358(9287):1051-1056.
10. Sinha N. Fertility, child work, and schooling consequences of family planning programs: evidence from an experiment in rural Bangladesh. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2005; 54(1):97-128.
11. Debpuur C, Phillips JF, Jackson E.F., Nazzar A., Ngom P, Binka FN. The impact of the Navrongo Project on contraceptive knowledge and use, reproductive preferences, and fertility. Stud Fam Plann. 2002; 33(2):141-164.
12. Barbiero VK. Urban health: it's time to get moving! Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 2(2):139-144.
13. Montgomery MR, Stren R, Cohen B., Reed HE, editors. Cities transformed: demographic change and its implications in the developing world. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record-id510693
14. Matthews Z, Channon A, Neal S., Osrin D, Madise N, Stones W. Examining the "urban advantage" in maternal health care in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(9):e1000327.
15. Speizer IS, Nanda P, Achyut P., Pillai G, Guilkey DK. Family planning use among urban poor women from six cities of Uttar Pradesh, India. J Urban Health. 2012; 89(4):639-658.
16. Ezeh AC, Kodzi I, Emina J. Reaching the urban poor with family planning services. Stud Fam Plann. 2010; 41(2):109-116.
17. Montana L, Lance PM, Mankoff C, Speizer I., Guilkey D. Using satellite data to delineate slum and non-slum sample domains for an urban population survey in Uttar Pradesh, India. Spatial Demography. Forthcoming 2014.
18. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE); Tupange; Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). Report of the baseline household survey for the Kenya Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (Tupange). Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2011. Co-pubished by Tupange and the KNBS. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/Kenya%20Household%20Survey%20Report%20Final%20120312.pdf
19. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE); Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI); National Population Commission (NPC). 2010-2011 Nigeria baseline survey for the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative. Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2011. Co-published by NURHI and the NPC. Available from: http://www.nurhitoolkit.org/sites/default/files/tracked-files/NURHI%20Baseline%20Household%20Survey.pdf
20. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE); Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine (ISSU); Centre de Recherche pour le Développement Humain (CRDH). 2011 enquête de base pour l'Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine (ISSU): enquête aupre's des ménages, rapport principal. Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2012. Co-published by ISSU and CRDH. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/rapport-menages-revised-final-10-22-12.pdf
21. Nanda P, Achyut P, Mishra A., Calhoun L. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Health Initiative: Uttar Pradesh, India, baseline survey 2010. Chapel Hill (NC): Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project; 2011. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/MLE-TWP-%20INDIA-2011-7Oct-nh.pdf
22. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE). Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Health Initiative: Uttar Pradesh, India, mid-term survey 2012, mid-term survey report. Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2012. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/10-10-12twp-1-2012-india-mid-term-multi-city-report.pdf
23. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE); National Population Council (NPC). Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative: Nigeria, 2012 midterm survey. Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2013. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/nigeria-midterm-twp2-2013.pdf
24. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE). Measurement, Learning & Evaluation of the Urban Reproductive Health Initiative: Kenya mid-term survey. Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2013. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/note-technique-de-mle---les-resultats-de-levaluation-a-mi-parcours-du-projet-issu.pdf
25. Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project (MLE); Initiative Sénégalaise de Santé Urbaine (ISSU); Agence pour la Promotion des Activités de Population - Sénégal (APAPS); Global Research and Advocacy Group (GRAG). Les résultats de l'évaluation à mi-parcours du projet ISSU/MLE. L'enquête aupre's des ménages et l'enquête au niveau des points de prestations de services (PPS). Chapel Hill (NC): MLE; 2014. Available from: https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/sites/mle/files/note-technique-de-mle---les-resultats-de-levaluation-a-mi-parcours-du-projet-issu.pdf
26. Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K., Suliman E, Wagstaff A, Amouzou A. Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries: an overview. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2000. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/IndicatorsOverview.pdf