On alternative problem formulations for multidisciplinary design optimization

4th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1992

Volumn , Issue , 1992, Pages 518-530

  Cramer, Evin J ^a   Frank, Paul D ^a   Shubin, Gregory R ^a   Dennis, J E ^b   Lewis, Robert Michael ^b  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DESIGN AIDS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

COMPUTING RESOURCE; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION CODE; OPTIMIZATION CONVERGENCE; PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS; PROBLEM FORMULATION;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84990996945     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bischof, C, A. Carle, G. Corliss, A. Griewank, and P. Hovland. ADIFOR, generating derivative codes from Fortran programs. Argonne Preprint MCS-P263-0991, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 1991.
2. Cabuk, H., C.-H. Sung, and V. Modi. Adjoint operator approach to shape design for internal incompressible flows. In G. S. Dulikravich, editor, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Inverse Design Concepts and Optimization in Engineering Sciences (ICIDES-III), October, 1991.
3. Cramer, E.J., J.E. Dennis Jr., P.D. Frank, R.M. Lewis, and G.R. Shubin. Optimization problem formulation alternatives for multidisciplinary design. Technical Report AMS-TR-188, Boeing Computer Services, September, 1992.
4. Curtis, A.R., Powell, M.J.D., and Reid, J.K. On the estimation of sparse Jacobian matrices. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics Applications, 13:117-120, 1974.
5. Frank, P. D., A. J. Booker, T. P. Caudel, and M. J. Healy. Optimization and search methods for multidisciplinary design. AIAA-92-4827, 4th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, September 21-23, 1992, Cleveland, OH.
6. Frank, P.D. and G.R. Shubin. A comparison of optimization-based approaches for solving the aerodynamic design problem. Third Air Force/NASA Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, September 24-26, 1990, San Francisco, CA.
7. Frank, P.D. and G.R. Shubin. A comparison of optimization-based approaches for a model computational aerodynamics design problem. Journal of Computational Physics, 98(1):74-89, 1992.
8. Griewank, A. and G.F. Corliss, editors. Automatic Differentiation of Algorithms: Theory, Implementation, and Application. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1991.
9. Grose, D.L. private communication.
10. Haftka, R.T., Z. Gurdal, and M.P. Kamat. Elements of Structural Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
11. Hou, G.J.-W., A.C. Taylor III, and V.M. Korivi. Discrete shape sensitivity equations for aerodynamic problems. AIAA Paper 91-2259, AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, Sacramento, California, June 24-27, 1991.
12. Huffman, W.P. Direct transcription and the optimal control problem: Putting the pieces together. AIAA Paper 92-4527, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, August 10-12, 1992.
13. Jameson, A. Aerodynamic design via control theory. Technical Report 88-64, ICASE, November, 1988.
14. Lasdon, L.S., A.D. Waren, A. Jain, and M. Ratner. Design and testing of a GRG code for nonlinear optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 4:34-50, 1979.
15. Newman, P.A., G.J.-W. Hou, H.E. Jones, A.C. Taylor III, and V.M. Korivi. Observations on computational methodologies for use in large-scale, gradient-based, multidisciplinary design incorporating advanced CFD codes. Technical Report 104206, NASA Technical Memorandum, February 1992.
16. Rizk, M.H. Aerodynamic optimization by simultaneously updating flow variables and design parameters. AGARD Paper No. 15, May 1989.
17. Shubin, G.R. A new model problem for static aeroelasticity. Technical Report AMS-TR-189, Boeing Computer Services, July, 1992.
18. Shubin, G.R. Obtaining “cheap” optimization gradients from computational aerodynamics codes. Technical Report AMS-TR-164, Boeing Computer Services, June, 1991.
19. Shubin, G.R. and P.D. Frank. A comparison of two closely-related approaches to aerodynamic design optimization. In G. S. Dulikravich, editor, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Inverse Design Concepts and Optimization in Engineering Sciences (ICIDES-III), October, 1991.
20. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems. AIAA Journal, 28(1):153-160, 1990.
21. Ta'asan, S., G. Kuruvila, and M.D. Salas. Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot. AIAA Paper 92-0025, 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January, 1992.