iFeel: A web system that compares and combines sentiment analysis methods

WWW 2014 Companion - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 75-78

  Araújo, Matheus ^a   Gonçalves, Pollyanna ^a   Cha, Meeyoung ^b   Benevenuto, Fabrício ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Comparison; Sentiment analysis; Social media; Web applications

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMBINED METHOD; COMPARISON; ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIAS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA DATUM; USER FRIENDLY INTERFACE; WEB APPLICATION;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84990954747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2567948.2577013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Senticnet 2.0. http://sentic.net/downloads/.
2. M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Technical report, University of Florida, 1999.
3. E. Cambria, A. Hussain, C. Havasi, C. Eckl, and J. Munro. Towards crowd validation of the uk national health service. In ACM WebSci, 2010.
4. E. Cambria, A. Livingstone, and A. Hussain. The hourglass of emotions. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2011.
5. E. Cambria, R. Speer, C. Havasi, and A. Hussain. Senticnet: A publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In AAAI Fall Symposium Series, 2010.
6. M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In ICWSM, 2010.
7. P. S. Dodds and C. M. Danforth. Measuring the happiness of large-scale written expression: songs, blogs, and presidents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4):441-456, 2009.
8. Esuli and Sebastiani. Sentwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In LREC, 2006.
9. A. Go, R. Bhayani, and L. Huang. Sentiment140. http://www.sentiment140.com/.
10. P. Gonçalves, M. Araújo, F. Benevenuto, and M. Cha. Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods. In COSN, 2013.
11. P. Goncalves, F. Benevenuto, and M. Cha. Panas-t: A pychometric scale for measuring sentiments on twitter. CoRR, 2013.
12. X. Hu, L. Tang, J. Tang, and H. Liu. Exploiting social relations for sentiment analysis in microblogging. In WSDM, 2013.
13. Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1):24-54, 2010.
14. M. Thelwall. Heart and soul: Sentiment strength detection in the social web with sentistrength, 2013.
15. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, C. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentistrength. http://www.sentiment140.com/.
16. H. Wang, D. Can, A. Kazemzadeh, F. Bar, and S. Narayanan. A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 U.S. presidential election cycle. In ACL, pages 115-120, 2012.
17. D. Watson and L. Clark. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1):1063-1070, 1985.
18. T. Wilson, P. Hoffmann, S. Somasundaran, J. Kessler, J. Wiebe, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. Opinionfinder: A system for subjectivity analysis. In EMNLP, 2005.