-
1
-
-
84872039726
-
Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics
-
E. Adie and W. Roe. Altmetric: Enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learned Publishing, 26(1):11-17, 2013.
-
(2013)
Learned Publishing
, vol.26
, Issue.1
, pp. 11-17
-
-
Adie, E.1
Roe, W.2
-
2
-
-
84890501952
-
Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery-critical review of the "h" index and its variants
-
S. G. Aoun, B. R. Bendok, R. J. Rahme, R. G. Dacey Jr, and H. H. Batjer. Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery-critical review of the "h" index and its variants. World Neurosurgery, 2012.
-
(2012)
World Neurosurgery
-
-
Aoun, S.G.1
Bendok, B.R.2
Rahme, R.J.3
Dacey, R.G.4
Batjer, H.H.5
-
3
-
-
84872016816
-
-
arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5611
-
J. Bar-Ilan, S. Haustein, I. Peters, J. Priem, H. Shema, and J. Terliesner. Beyond citations: Scholars' visibility on the social web. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.5611, 2012.
-
(2012)
Beyond Citations: Scholars' Visibility on the Social Web
-
-
Bar-Ilan, J.1
Haustein, S.2
Peters, I.3
Priem, J.4
Shema, H.5
Terliesner, J.6
-
5
-
-
33846556789
-
Journal status
-
J. Bollen, M. Rodriquez, and H. VandeSompel. Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3):669-687, 2006.
-
(2006)
Scientometrics
, vol.69
, Issue.3
, pp. 669-687
-
-
Bollen, J.1
Rodriquez, M.2
Van De Sompel, H.3
-
6
-
-
84863986501
-
Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
-
L. Bornmann, W. Marx, A. Y. Gasparyan, and G. D. Kitas. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology international, 32(7):1861-1867, 2012.
-
(2012)
Rheumatology International
, vol.32
, Issue.7
, pp. 1861-1867
-
-
Bornmann, L.1
Marx, W.2
Gasparyan, A.Y.3
Kitas, G.D.4
-
7
-
-
84859897031
-
Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact
-
G. Eysenbach. Can tweets predict citations? metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), 2011.
-
(2011)
Journal of Medical Internet Research
, vol.13
, Issue.4
-
-
Eysenbach, G.1
-
8
-
-
84871184949
-
Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0
-
S. Fausto, F. A. Machado, L. F. J. Bento, A. Iamarino, T. R. Nahas, and D. S. Munger. Research blogging: Indexing and registering the change in science 2.0. PloS one, 7(12):e50109, 2012.
-
(2012)
PloS One
, vol.7
, Issue.12
, pp. e50109
-
-
Fausto, S.1
Machado, F.A.2
Bento, L.F.J.3
Iamarino, A.4
Nahas, T.R.5
Munger, D.S.6
-
9
-
-
0033584703
-
Journal impact factor: A brief review
-
E. Garfield. Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8):979-980, 1999.
-
(1999)
Canadian Medical Association Journal
, vol.161
, Issue.8
, pp. 979-980
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
11
-
-
11444250613
-
What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
-
R. Leimu and J. Koricheva. What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1):28-32, 2005.
-
(2005)
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 28-32
-
-
Leimu, R.1
Koricheva, J.2
-
14
-
-
72949105819
-
Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact
-
C. Neylon and S. Wu. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS biology, 7(11):e1000242, 2009.
-
(2009)
PLoS Biology
, vol.7
, Issue.11
, pp. e1000242
-
-
Neylon, C.1
Wu, S.2
-
16
-
-
77956197364
-
Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social web
-
J. Priem and B. Hemminger. Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday, 15(7), 2010.
-
(2010)
First Monday
, vol.15
, Issue.7
-
-
Priem, J.1
Hemminger, B.2
-
19
-
-
84884307229
-
Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in web 2.0
-
D. Torres, Á. Cabezas, and E. Jiménez. Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in web 2.0. Comunicar, 21(41), 2013.
-
(2013)
Comunicar
, vol.21
, Issue.41
-
-
Torres, D.1
Cabezas, Á.2
Jiménez, E.3
-
20
-
-
58449103605
-
Why do statistics journals have low impact factors?
-
E. Van Nierop. Why do statistics journals have low impact factors? Statistica Neerlandica, 63(1):52-62, 2009.
-
(2009)
Statistica Neerlandica
, vol.63
, Issue.1
, pp. 52-62
-
-
Van Nierop, E.1
-
21
-
-
85007139236
-
Citation analysis in twitter. Approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences
-
Crete, Greece
-
K. Weller, E. Dröge, and C. Puschmann. Citation analysis in twitter. approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. In Proceedings of Making Sense of Microposts Workshop ( MSM2011). Co-located with Extended Semantic Web Conference, Crete, Greece, 2011.
-
(2011)
Proceedings of Making Sense of Microposts Workshop ( MSM2011), Co-located with Extended Semantic Web Conference
-
-
Weller, K.1
Dröge, E.2
Puschmann, C.3
|