Multidisciplinary design integration system for supersonic transport aircraft

4th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1992

Volumn , Issue , 1992, Pages

  Dovi, A R ^a,d   Wrenn, G A ^a,d   Barthelemy, J F M ^b,e   Coen, P G ^b,f   Hall, L E ^c,e  

^a Lockhecd Engineering and Sciences Co ^*  (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c Unisys   (United States)

^d Interdisciplinary Research Methods ^*  (United States)

^e Structural Dynamics Division   (United States)

^f Advanced Yehicle Division ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY; AIRCRAFT PRELIMINARY DESIGN; DESIGN INTEGRATIONS; ENGINEERING DISCIPLINES; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY EQUATION; HIGH SPEED CIVIL TRANSPORTS; MULTI-DISCIPLINARY DESIGNS; SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT;

EID: 84990890540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Rommel, B.A. and Dodd A.J. “Practical Considerations in Aeroelastic Design.” Douglas Paper 7458. April 1984.
2. Shuberth E.R. and Celniker Leo “Synthesizing Aircraft Design.” Space/Aeronautics, April 1969. pp.60-66.
3. Dollyhight S.M.. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., “Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization in Advanced Aircraft Design.” Third Air Force/NASA Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization-A Collection of Technical Papers. Sept. 1990.
4. Sobieszczanski-Sobiesk, J.,” Sensitivity of Complex Internally Coupled Systems” AIM Journal, Vol.28, No. 1, 1990.pp. 153-160.
5. James, Benjamin B., “An Alternative Formulation of the Global Sensitivity Equations. Third Air Force/NASA Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization-A Collection of Technical Papers, Sept. 1990.
6. Wrenn G. A., “An Indirect Method for Numerical Optimization Using the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser Function.” NASA CR-4220, March 1989.
7. Fenbert, J.W., Ozoroski, L.P. Geiselhart, K.A., Shields, E.W., and McElroy, M.O. “Concept Development of a Mach 2.4 High Speed Civil Transport,” to be published as a NAS A-TM
8. Barthelemy, J-F. M., Wrenn. GA, Dovi, A. R. and Coen P.G. “Integrating Aerodynamics and Structures in the Minimum Weight Design of a Supersonic Transport Wing.” AIAA 92-2372, presented at the AIA A/ASME/AHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Dallas. TX, April 1992.
9. Ritchie D. M. and Thompson K. “ The Unix Time-Sharing System.” Bell System Technical Journal. Vol.57, No.6,. Part 2, July-August 1972.
10. Kemiglian, Brian W. and Mashey, John R.. “The UNIX Programming Environment,” Software-Practice and Experience. Vol. 9. 1979.
11. Carlson H.W.. and Walkley, K.B.. “Numerical Methods and a Computer Program for Subsonic and Supersonic Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of Wings with Attainable Thrust Considerations.”. NASACR-3808.1984.
12. Giles, G.L.“Further Generalization of an Equivalent Plate Representation for Aircraft Structural Analysis.” AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol, 26.No. 1. Jan. 1989.
13. McCullers, L.A. “ Recent Experiences in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Pt 1, NAS A CP-2327. April 1984.pp. 395-412.
14. Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR), Vol III, part 25-Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category.
15. Johnson V. S., “Life Cycle Cost in the Conceptual Design Process.” AIAA 87-2889. Presented at the AIAA/AH3/A5EE Aircraft Design and Operations Meeting. St. Louis. MO. Sept. 1987.
16. “Melallic Materials and Elements for Flight Vehicle Structures.” Mil-Handbook-5, August 1962.