Quiet enjoyment in the national parks of england and wales: Public understanding of the term and its influence on attitudes towards recreational activities

Leisure Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 19-40

  Miller, Linda R ^a   Dickinson, Janet E ^a   Pearlman Houghie, Deborah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990884506     PISSN: 02614367     EISSN: 14664496     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02614360122839     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alesbury, A. (1996) Windermere Inquiry, Report of the Inspector upon the Public Local Inquiry into Byelaws Made by the Lake District Special Planning Board, Volume 1, DoE, Bristol.
2. Anon (1995) No sign of compromise in row over quiet enjoyment of parks, Planning, 1126, 4.
3. Anon (1996) Gummer breaks the speed limit against advice of his inspector, Planning, 1182, 7.
4. Caffyn, A. and Prosser, B. (1998) A review of policies for ‘quiet areas’ in the National Parks of England and Wales, Leisure Studies, 17, 269-91.
5. Centre for Leisure Research (1996) UK Day Visits Survey, 1994, Countryside Recreation Network, Cardiff.
6. Council for National Parks (1995) Council for National Parks Annual Report 1994/95, CNP, London.
7. Countryside Commission (1991a) An agenda for the countryside, Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, CCP 336.
8. Countryside Commission (1991b) Caring for the countryside: A policy agenda for England in the nineties, Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, CCP 351.
9. Countryside Commission (1997) Rural traffic: Getting it right, Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, CCP 515
10. Duffus, D. A. and Dearden, P. (1990) Non-consumptive wildlife-orientated recreation: A conceptual framework, Biological Conservation, 53, 213-31.
11. Harrison, C. (1991) Countryside recreation in a changing society, TMS, London.
12. Harrison, C. (1996) The Best Available Place-reconciling leisure uses of the countryside and their environmental impact, Area, 28(3), 339-46.
13. HMSO (1995) The environmental impact of leisure activities, Report of the House of Commons Environment Committee, HMSO, London.
14. Kay, G. and Moxham, N. (1994) Paths for Whom? Countryside access for recreational walking, IBG Rural Geography Study Conference, University of Nottingham, 21-22 September.
15. MacNaghten, P., Brown, R. and Reicher, S. (1992) On the nature of nature: experimental studies in the power of rhetoric, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 43-61.
16. National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, HMSO, London.
17. National Parks Review Panel (the Edwards Panel) (1991) National Park Review Panel Report: Fit for the Future, Countryside Commission, Cheltenham.
18. PA Cambridge Economic Consultants (1991) Yorkshire Dales Visitor Survey 1991, PA Cambridge Economic Consultants, Cambridge.
19. Pearlman, D. J., Dickinson, J. E., Miller, L. R. and Pearlman, J. J. (1999) The Environment Act 1995 and Quiet Enjoyment: Implications for Countryside Recreation in the National Parks of England and Wales, UK, Area, 31(1), 59-66.
20. Ruff, A. R. and Mellors, M. (1993) The Mountain Bike: the dream machine? Landscape Research, 18(3), 104-9.
21. Staples, S. (1996) Human response to noise: Psychological research and public policy, American Psychologist, 51(2), 143-50.
22. Stokes, G., Goodwin, P. and Kenny, T. (1992) Trends in transport and the Countryside: the Countryside Commission and transport policy in England, Countryside Commission, Manchester, CCP 387. The Environment Act 1995, HMSO, London.
23. The National Trust (1995) Open Countryside. Part B: Managing for Access, The National Trust, Cirencester.
24. Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority (1997) Sustainable Access Strategy, YDNPA, Grassington.