Outward views: Rights and utility in victorian state planning

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 263-279

  March, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Rights; Shared; Utility; Victorian; Views

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990881621     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0811114032000113653     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agarwal, B., 1994. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Alterman, R., Harris, D., and Hill, M., 1984. The Impact of Public Participation on Planning: The Case of the Derbyshire Structure Plan. Town Planning Review, 2: 177–196.
3. Benhabib, S., 1990. The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Edited by: Benhabib, S., and Dallmayr, F., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bentham, J., 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation
5. Bentham, J., 1961 [1789]. Society, Law and Morality, Edited by: Olafson, F., and Cliffs, E., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bobbio, N., 1996. The Age of Rights, Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Coates, B., 1982. Urban Change and Conflict: an Interdisciplinary Reader, Edited by: Andrew, B., Brook, C., Dunleavy, P., and McDowell, L., London: Harper & Row.
8. Dahl, R.A., 1982. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Daniels, N., ed. 1977. Reading Rawls, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
10. Davidson, M., and Dolnick, F., eds. 1999. A Glossary of Zoning, Development and Planning Terms, Chicago: American Planning Association.
11. Denman, D., 1978. The Place of Property: A New Recognition of the Function and Form of Property Rights in Land, Cambridge: Geographical Publications Limited.
12. Dworkin, R., 1977. Taking Rights Seriously, London: Duckworth.
13. Flyvbjerg, B., 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Enquiry Fails and How it can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Frey, R.G., 1985. Utility and Rights, Edited by: Prey, R.G., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15. Gillespie, J., 1989. Private Nuisance as a Means for Protecting Views from Obstruction. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 6: 94–118.
16. Gilpin, A., 1990. An Australian Dictionary of Environment and Planning, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
17. Gray, J., 1986. Liberalism, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
18. Habermas, J., 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, London: Beacon Press.
19. Habermas, J., 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, London: Beacon Press.
20. Habermas, J., 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Habermas, J., 1996 [1976]. Reading Habermas, Edited by: Outhwaite, W., 118–131. Cambridge: Polity.
22. Healey, P., 1999. Institutional Analysis, Communicative Planning and Shaping Places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19: 111–121.
23. Held, D., 1987. Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. Hyland, J.L., 1995. Democratic Theory: The Philosophical Foundations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
25. Locke, J., 1924 [1689]. Two Treatises on Government, London: Guersey Press.
26. Lyons, D., 1997. Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays, Edited by: Lyons, D., Oxford: Rowman & Littlefleld.
27. Mackie, J.L., 1984. Utility and Rights, Edited by: Frey, R.G., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
28. Macpherson, C., 1964. Post-Liberal Democracy?. Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science, 30: 485–498.
29. Macpherson, C., 1976. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Mattel, U., 2000. Basic Principles of Property law, London: Greenwood Press.
31. McAuslan, P., 1980. The Ideologies of Planning law, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
32. McCloskey, H.J., 1984. Rights and Utility, Edited by: Frey, R.G., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Mill, J.S., 1962 [1859]. On Liberty, London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
34. Mill, J.S., 1962 [1861]. Utilitarianism, London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
35. Millington, A., 1995. An Introduction to Property Valuation, London: The Estates Gazette Ltd.
36. Morris, S., 1984. Planning and Environment Service Victoria, Melbourne: Butterworths.
37. Neave, M., Rossiter, C., and Stone, M., 1994. Sackville and Neave Property Law: Cases and Materials, Sydney: Butterworths.
38. Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
39. Outhwaite, W., 1994. Habermas: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.
40. Postema, G., 1986. Bentham and the Common Law Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41. Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Rawls, J., 1993. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Rehg, W., 1994. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jurgen Habermas, Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Ryan, A., 1984. Property and Political Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
45. Ryan, P., 1987. Urban Development: Law and Policy, Sydney: The Law Book Company.
46. Schlatter. 1951. Private Property: The History of an Idea
47. Schrader-Frechette, K., 1993. “ Policy for Land: Law and Ethics ”. Edited by: Caldwell, L., and Schrader-Frechette, K., Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
48. Self, P., 1993. Government by the Market: the Politics of Public Choice, London: Macmillan.
49. Stein, LA., 1974. Urban Legal Problems, Sydney: The Law Book Company.
50. Sumner, L.W., 1984. Utility and Rights, Edited by: Frey, R.G., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
51. Sunderland, L., 1996. Popular Government and the Supreme Court, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
52. Untaru, S., 2002. Regulatory Frameworks for Place-based Planning. Urban Policy and Research, 20: 169–186.
53. Waldron, J., 1997. Classics of Modem Political Theory, Edited by: Cahn, S.M., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Wolff, R.P., 1977. Understanding Rawls, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Yin, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage.