Degree of project utility and investment value assessments

International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 667-684

  Kaklauskas, Arturas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

COPRAS; DUMA and INVAR methods; Investment value; Multiple criteria analysis; Recommendations; Utility degree

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990876783     PISSN: 18419836     EISSN: 18419844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2016.5.2679     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Schwartz, Y., Raslan, R. (2013), Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study, Energy and Buildings, 62: 350-359.
2. Lee, W.L. (2013), A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes, Energy and Buildings 62: 403-413.
3. Ferreira, J., Pinheiro, M. D., de Brito, J. (2014), Portuguese sustainable construction assessment tools benchmarked with BREEAM and LEED: An energy analysis, Energy and Buildings, 69: 451-463.
4. Howard, N. (2005), Building environmental assessment methods: in practice, The 2005 World Sustainable Building Conference, Tokyo, 27-29.
5. Communities and Local Government, Code for Sustainable Homes-Technical Guide, Com-munities and Local Government Publications, London, United Kingdom, 2010, 292 p.
6. Forbes, D., Smith, S., Horner, R. (2008), Investigating the weighting mechanism in BREEAM Ecohomes, CIB W055-W065 Joint International Symposium: Transformations through Construction, Dubai, United Arabic Emirates.
7. Kabak, M., Kose, E., Käaräalmaz, O., Burmaoglu, S. (2014), A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to assess building energy performance, Energy and Buildings, 72: 382-389.
8. Berardi, U. (2015), Chapter 15-Sustainability assessments of buildings, communities, and cities, Assessing and Measuring Environmental Impact and Sustainability, 497-545.
9. Mulliner, E., Smallbone, K., Maliene, V. (2013), An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method, Omega, 41 (2): 270-279.
10. Mulliner, E., Malys, N., Maliene, V.(2016), Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability, Omega, 59 (Part B), 146-156.
11. Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K. (2008), Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach, Omega, 36(3): 429-441.
12. Li, Y., Yu, W., Li, B., Yao, R. (2016), A multidimensional model for green building assessment: A case study of a highest-rated project in Chongqing, Energy and Buildings, 125(1): 231-243.
13. Balaban, O., de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2016), Sustainable buildings for healthier cities: assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan, Journal of Cleaner Productionl, In Press, Corrected Proof 2016.
14. Kaklauskas, A. (1999), Multiple criteria decision support of building life cycle, Research report presented for habilitation (DrSc): Technological sciences, civil engineering (02T), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius: Technika, 1999, 118 p.
15. Kaklauskas, A. (2015), Biometric and Intelligent Decision Making Support. Series: Intelli-gent Systems Reference Library, XII. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 81, 228 p.
16. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., V. Sarka (1994), The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and economic development of economy, 3: 131-139.
17. Method of Defining the Utility and Market Value of a Property, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301771443
18. International Valuation Standards, International Valuation Standards Council, 2011, 128 p.
19. Schmidt, R. Difference between Market Value and Investment Value in Commercial Real Estate, Property Metrics, 2014.
20. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Raslanas, S.(2005), Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishments, Energy and Buildings, 37(4): 361-372.
21. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Raslanas, S., Ginevicius, R., Komka, A., Malinauskas, P. (2006), Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: a Lithuanian case, Energy and Buildings, 38(5):454-462.
22. Kaklauskas, A., Kelpsiene, L., Zavadskas, E. K., Bardauskiene, D., Kaklauskas, G., Urbonas, M., Sorakas, V. (2011), Crisis management in construction and real estate: Conceptual modeling at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels. Land Use Policy, 28(1): 280-293.
23. Kaklauskas, A., Rute, J., Zavadskas, E. K., Daniunas, A., Pruskus, V., Bivainis, J., Gudauskas, R., Plakys, V. (2012), Passive house model for quantitative and qualitative analyses and its intelligent system, Energy and Buildings, 50: 7-18.
24. Kanapeckiene, L., Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Raslanas, S. (2011), Method and system for Multi-Attribute Market Value Assessment in analysis of construction and retrofit projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11): 14196-14207.
25. Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. (2007), Decision support system for innovation with a special emphasis on pollution, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 30(3-4): 518-528.
26. Jurgaitis, J. (2014), Building environmental impact assessment methods application in Lithuania. Master thesis, Construction Technology and Management study program. Supervisor: A. Kaklauskas, 98 p.
27. Kajauskaite, E. (2013), Moderniu inzineriniu sprendimu ir darnios statybos pavyzdys, Struc-tum, 46-54.
28. Gifford (2010), Orchard Park District Centre, Hull. BREEAM pre-assessment summary. Report No. 17318-SU001, 30 p.
29. Scott Hughes Design (2013), Friargate Court & Retail Units, Preston. Stage B, BREEAM Strategy & Pre-Assessment Report. Project number: 2604, 102 p.
30. Morrisons (2011), Dorking Store. BREEAM pre-assessment, 14 p.
31. S. R. Fall (2013), New Retail Foodstore. BREEAM pre-assessment report, 47 p.
32. Calculations with INVAR method. http://iti.vgtu.lt/ilearning/simpletable.aspx? sistemid=675