In Regard to Mattonen et al

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 1544-1545

  Sun, Roger ^a   Orlhac, Fanny ^b   Robert, Charlotte ^c   Reuzé, Sylvain ^c   Schernberg, Antoine ^a   Buvat, Irène ^b   Deutsch, Eric ^c   Ferté, Charles ^c  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b DIF   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RESEARCH; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LETTER; LUNG CANCER; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 84990829295     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.038     Document Type: Letter

References (10)

1. 1 Mattonen, S.A., Palma, D.A., Johnson, C., et al. Detection of local cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for lung cancer: Physician performance versus radiomic assessment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94 (2016), 1121–1128.
2. 2 Gillies, R.J., Kinahan, P.E., Hricak, H., Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278 (2016), 563–577.
3. 3 Aerts, H.J., Velazquez, E.R., Leijenaar, R.T., et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun, 5, 2014, 4006.
4. 4 Ferté C, Champiat S, Orlhac F, et al. Dynamic quantitative imaging approaches to identify pseudoprogression (PSPD) in cancer patients treated by immune checkpoints blockers. Oral communication. Presented at the AACR-NCI-EORTC (American Association for Cancer Research - National Cancer Institute - European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, November 5-9, 2015, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
5. 5 El Naqa, I., Grigsby, P., Apte, A., et al. Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes. Pattern Recognit 42 (2009), 1162–1171.
6. 6 Bird, D., Scarsbrook, A.F., Sykes, J., et al. Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer, 15, 2015, 844.
7. 7 Yu, H., Caldwell, C., Mah, K., et al. Automated radiation targeting in head-and-neck cancer using region-based texture analysis of PET and CT images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75 (2009), 618–625.
8. 8 Ling, C.C., Humm, J., Larson, S., et al. Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): Biological imaging and biological conformality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 (2000), 551–560.
9. 9 Schinagl, D.A., Kaanders, J.H., Oyen, W.J., From anatomical to biological target volumes: The role of PET in radiation treatment planning. Cancer Imaging 6 (2006), S107–S116.
10. 10 Mountz, J.M., Yankeelov, T.E., Rubin, D.L., et al. Letter to cancer center directors: Progress in quantitative imaging as a means to predict and/or measure tumor response in cancer therapy trials. J Clin Oncol 32 (2014), 2115–2116.