Preferential Semantics for Goals

Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1991

Volumn 2, Issue , 1991, Pages 698-703

  Wellman, Michael P ^a   Doyle, Jon ^b  

^a WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; SEMANTICS;

AI PLANNING; COMPUTATIONAL ADVANTAGES; DECISION-THEORETIC; KNOWLEDGE LEVEL; PLANNING STRATEGIES; PLANNING SYSTEMS; PREFERENTIAL SEMANTICS;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 84990624971     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Cohen, Philip R. and Levesque, Hector J. 1990. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42:213-261.
2. Dean, Thomas and Wellman, Michael P. 1989. On the value of goals. In Proceedings from the Rochester Planning Workshop. Published as University of Rochester TR 284.
3. Doyle, Jon 1980. A model for deliberation, action, and introspection. AI-TR 581, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139.
4. Doyle, Jon 1990. Rationality and its roles in reasoning (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press. 1093-1100.
5. Farquhar, Peter H. 1987. Applications of utility theory in artificial intelligence research. In Sawaragi, Y.; Inoue, K.; and Nakayama, H., editors, Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems, Volume 2, Volume 286 of Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer-Verlag. 155-161.
6. Feldman, Jerome A. and Sproull, Robert F. 1977. Decision Theory and Artificial Intelligence II: The hungry monkey. Cognitive Science 1:158-192.
7. Fishburn, Peter C. and Vickson, Raymond G. 1978. Theoretical foundations of stochastic dominance. In Whitmore, G. A. and Findlay, M. C, editors, Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision Making Under Risk. D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA.
8. Good, I. J. 1962. A five-year plan for automatic chess. In Dale, E. and Michie, D., editors, Machine Intelligence 2. Oliver and Boyd, London. 89-118.
9. Gorman, W. M. 1968. The structure of utility functions. Review of Economic Studies 35:367-390.
10. Haddawy, Peter and Hanks, Steve 1990. Issues in decision-theoretic planning: Symbolic goals and numeric utilities. In Proceedings of the DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling, and Control. 48-58.
11. Keeney, Ralph L. 1981. Analysis of preference dependencies among objectives. Operations Research 29:1105-1120.
12. Keeney, Ralph L. and Raiffa, Howard 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
13. Loui, Ronald 1990. Defeasible specification of utilities. In Kyburg, Henry E. Jr.; Loui, Ronald P.; and Carlson, Greg N., editors, Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 345-359.
14. Newell, Allen 1982. The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence 18(1):87-127.
15. Savage, Leonard J. 1972. The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications, New York, second edition.
16. Simon, Herbert A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69:99-118.
17. Wellman, Michael P. 1990a. Formulation of Tradeoffs in Planning Under Uncertainty. Pitman and Morgan Kaufmann.
18. Wellman, Michael P. 1990b. The STRIPS assumption for planning under uncertainty. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
19. Wellman, Michael P.; Doyle, Jon; and Dean, Thomas 1991. Goals, preferences, and utilities: A reconciliation. In preparation.