Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids: Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems

Decision Sciences

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 723-747

  Olson, David L ^a   Moshkovich, Helen M ^b   Schellenberger, R ^c   Mechitov, Alexander I ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

^c EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

and Selection Decisions; Multiattribute Decision Making; Preference Elicitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990569666     PISSN: 00117315     EISSN: 15405915     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01573.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. An empirical assessment of computer‐assisted decision analysis
2. Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices: The additive case
3. Perspectives on utility theory
4. A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multiattribute value function
5. On a short‐coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies
6. Modelling and supporting the process of choice between alternatives: The focus of ASTRIDA
7. Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement
8. A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method
9. Software review: Overview of the MCDA software market
10. Decision analysis applications in the operations research literature, 1970–1989
11. Linear models in decision making
12. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process
13. What constitutes a good decision
14. Unit weighting schemes for decision making
15. Utility models for multiple objective decisions: Do they accurately represent human preferences
16. Annals of operations research. Vol. 19
17. Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for application to water resources planning
18. Experiences with MAUD: Aiding decision structuring versus bootstrapping the decision maker
19. Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques
20. ZAPROS‐LM—A method and system for rank‐ordering of multiattribute alternatives
21. Experiments comparing qualitative approaches to rank ordering of multiattribute alternatives
22. Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART
23. Review of empirical studies in multiobjective mathematical programming: Subject learning and response to nonlinear utility
24. Evaluating the usefulness of decision aids: A methodological perspective
25. Classement et choix en presence de criteres multiples
26. Comparison of two decision‐aid models applied to a nuclear plant siting example
27. An eye fixation analysis of multiattribute choice
28. ARIADNE: A knowledge‐based interactive system for planning and decision support
29. Decision support systems effectiveness: Conceptual framework and empirical evaluation
30. Analytical issues in decision methodology
31. Use and abuse of weights in multiple objective decision support models
32. An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models
33. Bibliographical research on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
34. A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making
35. An experimental study of the effectiveness of computer‐programmed decision support
36. On the evaluation and application of different scales for quantifying pairwise comparisons in fuzzy sets
37. An examination of the effectiveness of multidimensional decision‐making methods: A decision‐making paradox
38. A minimization approach to membership evaluation in fuzzy sets and error analysis
39. Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don't make no mind
40. Recent developments in modeling preferences under risk
41. Decision modeling and rational choice: AHP and utility theory