Introduction: Lost promise: Explaining latin american underdevelopment

Promise of Development: Theories of Change in Latin America

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 3-35

  Klarén, Peter F ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990514385     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429497995     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States,” Latin American Research Review 12:3 (1977), pp. 15-17.
2. Theotonio dos Santos, “The Structure of Dependence,” The American Economic Review 60:2 (May 1970), pp. 231-236.
3. John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) reformulated liberal economic theory in his influential The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, published in 1936.
4. Agnus Blomstrom and Bjom Hettne, Development Theory in Transition, The Dependency Debate and Beyond: Third World Responses (London: Zed Books, 1984), p. 59.
5. Tulio Halperin-Donghi, ‘“Dependency Theory’ and Latin American Historiography,” Latin American Research Review 17:1 (1982), p. 116.
6. Charles W. Bergquist, Alternative Approaches to the Problem of Development: A Selected and Annotated Bibliography (Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, 1979), item #118.
7. Colin Henfrey, “Dependency, Modes of Production, and Class Analysis of Latin America,” Latin American Perspectives 8:3-4 (1981), pp. 17-54.
8. Robert A. Packenham, Latin American Dependency Theories, mimeo (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, July 1974);
9. David Ray, “The Dependency Model of Latin American Underdevelopment: Three Basic Fallacies,” Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs 15 (February 1973), pp. 4-20.
10. Marcelo J. Cavarozzi and James F. Petras, “Chile,” in Latin America: The Struggle with Dependency and Beyond, edited by Ronald H. Chilcote and Joel C. Edelstein (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974), pp. 495-578;
11. James Cockcroft, Andre Gunder Frank, and Dale Johnson, Dependency and Underdevelopment: Latin America’s Political Economy (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1972).
12. Alfred Stepan, The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978), pp. 26-40.
13. “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The New Corporatism: Socio-Political Structures in the Iberian World, edited by Fredrick B. Pike and Thomas Stritch (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974), pp. 93-94.
14. C. Newton. Another important book on the new corporatism is Politics and Social Change in Latin America: The Distinct Tradition, edited by Howard J. Wiarda (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1974).
15. J. Samuel Valenzuela and Arturo Valenzuela, “Modernization and Dependency: Alternative Perspectives in the Study of Latin American Underdevelopment,” Comparative Politics 10:4 (July 1978), pp. 542-543.
16. Guillermo A. O’Donnell, Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. 2nd ed. (Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of International Studies, 1979), p. 206n.
17. Karen L. Remmer and Gilbert W. Merkx, “Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism Revisited,” Latin American Research Review 17:2 (1982), p. 5.
18. The New Authoritarianism in Latin America, edited by David Collier (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979), pp. 7-9.