Stop “going over” exams! the multiple benefits of team exams

Journal of Management Education

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 818-827

  Stark, Gary ^a  

^a NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

exams; experiential; feedback; teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990405097     PISSN: 10525629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1052562906287965     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
2. Bargh, J., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593-604.
3. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
4. Catanzano, R., & Wilson, M. S. (1977). The effect of retesting contingencies on achievements, anxiety, and attitude in seventh grade science. Science Education, 61(2), 173-180.
5. Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(3), 215-235.
6. Dempster, F. N. (1992). Using tests to promote learning: A neglected classroom resource. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(4), 213-217.
7. Feldman, D. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 47-53.
8. Gagne, R., & Driscoll, M. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539.
11. Libby, R., Trotman, K. T., & Zimmer, I. (1987). Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 81-87.
12. Michaelsen, L. K., Fink, L. D., & Knight, A. (1997). Designing effective group activities: Lessons for classroom teaching and faculty development. In D. DeZure (Ed.), To improve the academy (pp. 373-398). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
13. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 834-839.
14. Nungester, R. J., & Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 18-22.
15. Rohm, R. A., Sparzo, F. J., & Bennett, C. M. (1986). College student performance under repeated testing and cumulative testing conditions: Report on five studies. Journal of Education Research, 80(2), 99-104.
16. Simkin, M. G., & Kuechler, W. L. (2005). Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 73-97.
17. Stasson, M. F., & Bradshaw, S. D. (1995). Explanations of individual-group performance differences: What sort of “bonus” can be gained through group interaction? Small Group Research, 26(2), 296-308.
18. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-39.
19. Webb, N. M., Farivar, S. H., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory into Practice, 4(1), 13-20.