Value for money, best value and measuring government performance: An introduction to the Symposium

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 387-391

  Halachmi, Arie ^a  

^a TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990398508     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852300663001     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Australian CPA (1998) Performance Measurement: Knowing the Dynamics. Available online as an Internet document at: http://www.cpaonline.com.au/html/aa/9810/pg_aa9810_performanc.html
2. Bovaird, T. and Halachmi, A. (1999) Community Scorecard: The Role of Stokeholders in Performance Assessment, in A. Halachmi (ed.) Performance and Quality Measurement in Government, pp. 145–155. Burke, VA. Chatelaine Press.
3. Griener, J.M. (1996) ‘Positioning Performance Measurement for the Twenty-First Century’, in A. Halachmi and G. Bouckaert (eds) Organizational Performance and Management in the Public Sector, pp. 11–50. Westport, CT. Quorum Press.
4. Halachmi, A. (1997) ‘Government Reforms and Public Productivity: Do we have all the Answers?’, Work Study 46(7): 233–245.
5. Halachmi, A. and Bouckaert, G. (eds) (1996) Organizational Performance and Management in the Public Sector. Westport, CT. Quorum Press
6. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1993) ‘Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work’, Harvard Business Review (Sept.–Oct.): 134–142.
7. Walker, R.G. (1999) ‘Reporting on Service Efforts and Accomplishments in the NSW Public Sector’. Available online: www.occg.nsw.gov.au/pubs/sea/essay/5comparisons.html