“nomadic theorizing with a power compass”: Clegg, Interstitiality, and Critical Organizational Communication Studies

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 115-128

  Mumby, Dennis K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clegg; critical organization studies; nomadic theorizing; power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990397422     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318904265133     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
2. Barker, J. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Barker, J. R., & Cheney, G. (1994). The concept and practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life. Communication Monographs, 61, 19-43.
4. Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Clegg, S. (1975). Power, rule, and domination. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6. Clegg, S. (1989a). Frameworks of power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Clegg, S. (1989b). Radical revisions: Power, discipline and organizations. Organization Studies, 10, 97-115.
8. Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organizations in a postmodern world. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Clegg, S. (1994). Weber and Foucault: Social theory for the study of organizations. Organization, 1, 149-178.
10. Clegg, S. (1996). Creating a career: Observations from outside the mainstream. In P. Frost & S. M. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life: Personal accounts of careers in academia (pp. 37-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Clegg, S., & Dunkerley, D. (Eds.). (1980). Organization, class and control. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
12. Clegg, S., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Clegg, S., Linstead, S., & Sewell, G. (2000). Only penguins: A polemic on organizational theory from the edge of the world. Organization Studies, 21, 103-117.
14. Corman, S. R., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground. New York: Guilford.
15. Donaldson, L. (1985). In defence of organization theory: A reply to the critics. UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Donaldson, L. (1988). In successful defence of organization theory: A routing of the critics. Organization Studies, 9, 28-32.
17. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
18. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies.
19. Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: MacMillan.
20. Miller, K. (2000). Common ground from the post-positivist perspective: From “straw person” argument to collaborative co-existence. In S. R. Corman & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 46-67). New York: Guilford.
21. Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
22. Said, E. (1994). Representations of the intellectual. New York: Pantheon.
23. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.