메뉴 건너뛰기
Australasian Psychiatry
Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 212-214
How to Make an Editor's Life Easier
Author keywords

author; editor; medical publishing; peer review; writing
Indexed keywords

EID: 84990394438     PISSN: 10398562     EISSN: 14401665     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1665.2001.00329.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (2)
References (5)
  • 1
    • 0028364047 scopus 로고
    • Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal
    • Rochon PA Gurwitz JH Cheung CM Hayes JA Chalmers TC. Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. Journal of the American Medical Association 1994; 272: 108-113.
    • (1994) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.272 , pp. 108-113
    • Rochon, P.A.1    Gurwitz, J.H.2    Cheung, C.M.3    Hayes, J.A.4    Chalmers, T.C.5
  • 2
    • 0029643683 scopus 로고
    • Polyauthoritis giftosa
    • Kapoor VK. Polyauthoritis giftosa. Letter. Lancet 1994; 346: 1039.
    • (1994) Letter. Lancet , vol.346 , pp. 1039
    • Kapoor, V.K.1
  • 3
    • 0034014722 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias and the integrity of psychiatric research
    • Gilbody SN Fong S. Publication bias and the integrity of psychiatric research. Psychological Medicine 2000; 30: 254.
    • (2000) Psychological Medicine , vol.30 , pp. 254
    • Gilbody, S.N.1    Fong, S.2
  • 4
    • 84945626880 scopus 로고
    • Peer review practices of psychological journals; the fate of published articles, submitted again
    • Peters DP Ceci SJ. Peer review practices of psychological journals; the fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 1982; 5: 187-255.
    • (1982) Behavioural and Brain Sciences , vol.5 , pp. 187-255
    • Peters, D.P.1    Ceci, S.J.2
  • 5
    • 0033838913 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
    • Rothwell PM Martyn CN. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?. Brain 2000; 123: 1964-1969.
    • (2000) Brain , vol.123 , pp. 1964-1969
    • Rothwell, P.M.1    Martyn, C.N.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.