Gender, diversity and risk assessment in Canadian corrections

Probation Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 163-172

  Shaw, Margaret ^a   Hannah Moffat, Kelly ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990386628     PISSN: 02645505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026455050004700301     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alexander, J. (1988) Working Paper XVI: Initial Security Classification Guidelines for Females. New York: Department of Correctional Services.
2. Andrews, D., Bonta, J. & Hoge, R.D. (1990) ‘Classification for Effective Rehabilitation’ in Criminal Justice and Behaviour 17, pp. 19-52.
3. Andrews, D., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P. & Cullen, F.T. (1990) ‘Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-analysis’ in Criminology 28 (3), pp.369-404.
4. Aubrey, R. & Hough, M. (1997) Assessing Offenders' Needs: Assessment Scales for the Probation Service. Research Study No. 166. London: Home Office.
5. Bhui, H.S. (1999) ‘Race, Racism and Risk Assessment: Linking Theory to Practice with Black Mentally Disordered Offenders’ in Probation Journal, 46 (3), pp.171-181.
6. Blanchette, K. & Motiuk, L. (1995) Female Offenders Risk Assessment: The Case Management Strategies Approach. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Annual Convention. Charlottetown.
7. Blanchette, K. (1997) ‘Classifying Female Offenders for Correctional Interventions’ in Forum on Corrections Research 9 (1). Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
8. Bloom, S. & Covington, S. (1998) Gender Specific Programming For Female Offenders: What is Important and Why it is Important. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology meetings, November. Washington DC.
9. Bonta, J. (1989) ‘Native Inmates: Institutional Response, Risk, and Needs’ in Canadian Journal of Criminology 31 (1), pp.49-60.
10. Bonta, J., Pang, B. Wallace-Capretta, S. (1995) ‘Predictors of Recidivism Among Incarcerated Females Offenders’ in The Prison Journal 75 (3), pp.227-293.
11. Brennan, T. (1998) ‘Institutional Classification for Females: Problems and Some Proposals for Reform’ in Zaplin, R.T. (ed.) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Gaithersburg Maryland: Aspen Publishers Inc.
12. Burke, P. & Adams, L. (1991) Classification Handbook for Women Offenders in State Correctional Facilities: A Handbook for Practitioners. Washington: Cosmos Corp.
13. Carlen, P. (1998) Sledgehammer: Women's Imprisonment at the Millennium. London: Macmillan Press.
14. Castel, R. (1991) ‘From Dangerousness to Risk’ in Burchell, G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (ed.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Comack, E. (1996) Women in Trouble. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
16. Creating Choices (1990) Report of the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
17. Daley, D. & Lane, R. (1999) ‘Actuarially Based ‘On-line’ Risk Assessment in Western Australia’ in Probation Journal 46 (3), pp.164-170.
18. Dawson, D. (1999) Risk of Violence Assessment: Aboriginal Offenders and the Assumption of Homogeneity. Paper presented at Australian Institute of Criminology Conference, Adelaide 13-15 October 1999.
19. Dowden, C. & Andrews, D.A. (1999) ‘What Works for Female Offenders: a Meta-analytic Review’ in Crime and Delinquency 45 (4), pp. 438-452.
20. Farr, K. (2000) ‘Classification for Female Inmates: Moving Forward’ in Crime and Delinquency 46 (1), pp. 317.
21. Feeley, M. & Simon, J. (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes of the Emerging Strategy for Corrections and its Implications’ in Criminology 30 (4), pp.49-74.
22. Fisher, D. & Mair, G. (1998) A Review of Classification Schemes for Sex Offenders. Research Findings No. 78. London: Research and Statistics Directorate, Home Office.
23. Gottfredson, D. M. & Tonry, M. (eds.) (1987) Prediction and Classification, in Crime and Justice Vol. 9. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Gottfredson, S.D. (1987) ‘Prediction: an Overview of Selected Methodological Issues’ in Gottfredson, D. M. & Tonry, M. (eds) Prediction and Classification. Crime and Justice Vol. 9 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Hannah-Moffat, K. (1999) ‘Moral Agent or Actuarial Subject’ in Theoretical Criminology 3 (1), pp.71-94.
26. Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. (2000a) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women's Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
27. Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. (2000b) ‘Taking Risks’: Gender, Diversity, Security Classification and Assessment with Canadian Federally Sentenced Women. Final Report. Ottawa: Status of Women, Canada.
28. Hannah-Moffat, K. (forthcoming) Punishment in Disguise. Governance in Canadian Federal Women's Prisons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
29. Hayman, S. (2000) ‘Prison Reform and Incorporation: Lessons from Britain and Canada’ in Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women's Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
30. Holt, N. (1996) Inmate Classification: A Validation Study of the California System. California Department of Corrections.
31. Jackson, M. (1999) ‘Canadian Aboriginal Women and their “Criminality”: the Cycle of Violence in the Context of Difference’ in The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 32 (2), pp.197-208.
32. Kendall, K. (1993) Programme Evaluation of Therapeutic Services at the Prison for Women. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
33. Kendall, K. (2000) ‘Psy-ence Fiction: Governing Female Prisons through the Psychological Sciences’ in Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women's Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
34. Liebling, A. (1994) ‘Suicide Among Women Prisoners’ in Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 33 (1), pp.1-9.
35. Mair, G. (1999) It's a Man's Man's Man's World: Risk/Need Assessment in England and Wales. Paper presented at the ‘Workshop on Risk Gender, Diversity and Classification in Federally Sentenced Women's Facilities’. Toronto: May 22-23.
36. McHugh, M. (1997) ‘Risk Assessment and Management of Suicides in Prison’ in Prison Service Journal 113, p.4.
37. McMahon, M. (1999) Assessing Female Offenders: Art or Science? Paper presented at the Workshop on Risk Gender, Diversity and Classification in Federally Sentenced Women's Facilities. Toronto: May 22-23.
38. Monture-Angus, P. (2000) ‘Aboriginal Women and Correctional Practice: Reflections on the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women’ in Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women's Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
39. Morish, M., Bynum, T. & Koons, B.A. (1998) Women Offenders: Programming Needs and Promising Approaches. Research in Brief. Washington DC: NIJ.
40. Motiuk, L. (1997) ‘Classification for Correctional Programming: the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) Process’ in Forum on Corrections Research 9 (1). Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
41. Motiuk, L. & Blanchette, K. (1998) What Works in Assessing Female Offender Risk and Need. Paper presented at ICCA 6th Annual Research Conference. Arlington Virginia.
42. Nesbitt, C. & Argento, A. (1987) Female Classification: An Examination of the Issues. Maryland American Correctional Association.
43. Owen, B. & Bloom, B. (1995) Profiling the Needs of California's Female Prisoners. Washington DC: NIC.
44. Pollack, S. (2000) ‘Dependency Discourse as Social Control’ in Hannah-Moffat, K. & Shaw, M. An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women's Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
45. Price, D. (1999) Spies, Dickie, and Prison Security: a Short History of Security Classification in the English Prison System. Paper presented at the British Criminology Conference, July, Liverpool.
46. Price, R. (1997) ‘On the Risks of Risk Prediction’ in Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 8(1), pp. 1-4.
47. Shaw, M. (1993) ‘Reforming Federal Women's Imprisonment’ in Adelberg, E. & Currie, C. (eds.) In Confiict With the Law: Women and the Canadian Justice System. Vancouver: Press Gang.
48. Shaw, M. (forthcoming) Conflicting Agendas: Evaluating Feminist Programmes for Offending Women. New York: SUNY Press.
49. Shaw, M. with Rodgers, K., Blanchette, J., Hattem, T., Thomas, L.S. & Tamarack, L. (1992) Paying the Price: Federally Sentenced Women in Context. User Report 193-199. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General.
50. Sparks, R., Bottoms, A.E. & Hay, E. (1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.