The interactive effects of role change goals andrelational exchangeson employee upward influence tactics

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 385-403

  Wilson, Steven R ^c  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

employee role change; leader member exchange; upward influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990385297     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318904270743     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Drake, B. H., & Moberg, D. J. (1986). Communicating influence attempts in dyads: Linguistic sedatives and palliatives. Academy of Management Review, 11, 567-854.
3. Fairhurst, G. T. (1993). The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry—a discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60, 321-351.
4. Farmer, S. M., Maslyn, J. M., Fedor, D. B., & Goodman, J. S. (1997). Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 17-42.
5. Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowland, K. M.,& Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: A test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 101-135.
6. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
7. Graen, G. B., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leadermember exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction—testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
8. Graen, G.,& Scandura, T. A., (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
9. Jablin, F. M. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In F. M. Jablin & L. L Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods(pp. 732-818). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Kellerman, K., & Cole, T. (1994). Classifying compliance gaining taxonomies: Taxonomic disorder and strategic confusion. Communication Theory, 4, 3-60.
11. Kipnis, D., Schmidt, M.,& Wilkinson I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Exploration in getting on e’sway. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.
12. Krone, K. J. (1992). A comparison of organizational, structural, and relationship effects on subordinates’upward influence choices. Communication Quarterly, 40, 1-15.
13. Maslyn, J. M., Farmer, S. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1996). Failed upward influence attempts: Predicting the nature of subordinate persistence in pursuit of organizational goals. Group and Organization Management, 21, 461-480.
14. Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., Hart, Z., & Peterson, D. (1999). Test of antecedents and outcomes of employee role negotiation ability. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 24-48.
15. Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 109-149.
16. Schmidt, S., & Kipnis, D. (1984). Managers’ pursuit of individual and organizational goals. Human Relations, 37, 781-794.
17. Schriesheim, C. A.,& Hinkin, T. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, & Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.
18. Waldron V. R. (1999). Communication practices of followers, members, and protegés: The case of upward influence tactics. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication yearbook 22(pp. 251-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Wilson, S. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M., & Youn, J. Y. (1993). Patterns of influence behavior for managers. Group and Organization Studies, 18, 5-28.