Discursiveness, contradiction, and unintended consequences in successive downsizings

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 501-540

  Cahill, Daniel J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Price water house Coopers LLP ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990385217     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318902154001     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ashcraft, K. L. (1999). Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary executive succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 240-280.
2. Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2000). Time orientation and temporal variation across work groups: Implications for group and organizational communication. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 218-242.
3. Banks, S. P., & Riley, P. (1993). Structuration theory as an on tology for communication research. Communication Yearbook, 16, 167-208.
4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance: Beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
5. Bastien, D. T. (1989). Communication, conflict, and learning. In A. Van de Ven, H. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation (pp. 367-396). New York: Harper & Row.
6. Boje, D. M., Rosile, G. A., Dennehy, R., & Summers, D. J. (1997). Restorying reengineering: Some deconstructions and postmodern alternatives. Communication Research, 24, 631-668.
7. Bottorff, D. (1987). The velvet boot. New England Business, 9, 24-28.
8. Boudon, R. (1982). The unintended consequences of social action. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
9. Brockner, J. (1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory and practice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 213-255). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10. Brockner, J. (1992). Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors. California Management Review, 34, 9-28.
11. Brockner, J. (1994). Perceived fairness and survivors’reactions to layoffs, or how downsizing organizations can do well by doing good. Social Justice Research, 7, 345-364.
12. Brockner, J., DeWitt, R., Grover, S., & Reed, T. (1990). When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers’ explanations of a layoff and survivors’ reaction to the layoff. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 26, 389-407.
13. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T. F., DeWitt, R., & O’Malley, M. (1987). Survivors’reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526-542.
14. Browning, L. D., & Beyer, J. M. (1998). The structuring of shared voluntary standards in the U.S. semiconductor industry: Communicating to reach agreement. Communication Monographs, 65, 220-243.
15. Budros, A. (1999). A conceptual framework for analyzing why organizations downsize. Organization Science, 10, 69-82.
16. Burke, R. J., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). The new organizational reality: Transition and renewal. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The organization in crisis: Downsizing, restructuring and privatization (pp. 3-19). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17. Cameron, K. S. (1985). An empirical test of the multiple constituencies model of organizational effectiveness (Working paper). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
18. Cameron, K. S. (1994). Strategies for successful organizational downsizing. Human Resource Management, 33, 188-211.
19. Cameron, K. S., Freeman, S., & Mishra, A. (1991). Best practices in white-collar downsizing: Managing contradictions. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 57-73.
20. Cameron, K. S., Freeman, S., & Mishra, A. (1993). Downsizing and redesigning organizations. In G. Huber & W. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign (pp. 19-65). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
22. Cameron, K. S., Whetten, D. A., & Kim, M. U. (1987). Organizational dysfunctions of decline. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 126-137.
23. Cappelli, P., Bassi, L., Katz, H., Knoke, D., Osterman, P., & Useem, M. (1997). Change at work. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Cascio, W. (1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7, 95-104.
25. Cheney, G., & Carroll, C. (1997). The person as object in discourses in and around organizations. Communication Research, 24, 593-630.
26. Chilton, K., & Weidenbaum, M. (1994, November). A new social contract for the American workplace (Paper No. 123). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for the Study of American Business Policy.
27. Clark, P. (1985). A review of the theories of time and structure for organizational sociology. In S. B. Bacharach & S. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 35-79). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
28. Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1991, Fall). Organizational vision and visionary organizations. California Management Review, pp. 30-52.
29. Conant, R. C., & Ashby, R. W. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1, 89-97.
30. Cooren, F., & Fairhurst, G. T. (in press). The leader as a practical narrator: Leadership as the art of translating. In D. Holman & R. Thorpe (Eds.), The manager as a practical author. London: Sage Ltd.
31. D’Aunno, T., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). The responses of drug abuse treatment organizations to financial adversity: A partial test of the threat-rigidity thesis. Journal of Management, 18, 117-131.
32. Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33. DeWitt, R. L. (1993). The structural consequences of downsizing. Organization Science, 4, 30-40.
34. Elster, J. (1978). Logic and society: Contradictions and possible worlds. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35. Fairhurst, G. T., Jordan, J. M., & Neuwirth, K. (1997). Why are we here: Managing the meaning of an organizational mission statement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 243-263.
36. Feldman, D. C., & Leana, C. R. (1989). Managing layoffs: Experiences at the Challenger disaster site and the Pittsburgh steel mills. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 52-64.
37. Fisher, S. R., & White, M. A. (2000). Downsizing in a learning organization: Are there hidden costs? Academy of Management Review, 25, 244-251.
38. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
39. Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 79-87.
40. Ford, J. D., & Backoff, R. W. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 81-121). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
41. Freeman, S. J., & Cameron, K. S. (1993). Organizational downsizing: A convergence and reorientation framework. Organization Science, 4, 10-29.
42. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Greenhalgh, L., Lawrence, A. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1988). Determinants of workforce reduction strategies in declining organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13, 241-254.
45. Handy, C. (1995). The age of paradox. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
46. Hatch, M. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team. Organization Science, 8, 275-288.
47. Henkoff, R. (1994, January 10). Getting beyond downsizing. Fortune, pp. 58-64.
48. Howard, L. A., & Geist, P. (1995). Ideological positioning in organizational change: The dialectic of control in a merging organization. Communication Monographs, 62, 110-131.
49. Johnson, J. R., Bernhagen, M., Miller, V., & Allen, M. (1996). The role of communication in managing reductions in workforce. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 24, 139-164.
50. Leana, C. R., & Feldman, D. C. (1992). Coping with job loss: How individuals, organizations and communities respond to layoffs. New York: Macmillan/Lexington Books.
51. Leana, C. R., & Ivancevich, J. M. (1987). Involuntary job loss: Institutional interventions and a research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 12, 301-312.
52. McKinley, W. (1992). Decreasing organizational size: To untangle or not to untangle? Academy of Management Review, 17, 112-123.
53. McKinley, W. (1993). Organizational decline and adaptation: Theoretical controversies. Organization Science, 4, 1-9.
54. McKinley, W., & Scherer, A. G. (2000). Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. Academy of Management Review, 25, 735-752.
55. McKinley, W., Zhao, J., & Rust, K. G. (2000). A sociocognitive interpretation of organizational downsizing. Academy of Management Review, 25, 227-243.
56. Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904.
57. Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 515-537.
58. Mishra, A. K., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998). Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The role of trust, empowerment, justice and work redesign. Academy of Management Review, 23, 567-588.
59. Mroczkowski, T., & Hanaoka, M. (1997). Effective rightsizing strategies in Japan and America: Is there a convergence of employment practices? Academy of Management Executive, 11, 57-67.
60. Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology, and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
61. Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Organization-communication: Emerging perspectives I (pp. 151-167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
65. Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (in press). Contradictions and tensions of planned organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. Van de Ven (Eds.) Handbook of organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
67. Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
68. Thompson, M. P. (1988). Being, thought and action. In R. E. Quinn & K. S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 123-135). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
69. Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 19-80). New York: Harper Collins.
70. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. H., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.
71. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
72. Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (1994). Organizational-level productivity initiatives: The case of downsizing. In D. H. Harris (Ed.), Organizational linkages: Understanding the productivity paradox (pp. 262-290). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
73. Yoder, D., & Staudohar, P. D. (1985, Summer). Management and public policy in plant closure. Sloan Management Review, pp. 45-57.