Performance-Based Planning: Perspectives from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 396-409

  Baker, Douglas C ^a   Sipe, Neil G ^b   Gleeson, Brendan J ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

effects based planning; flexible zoning; performance based planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990365177     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05283450     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker, M. 1999. Continual compromise'The ongoing story of IPA's implementation. Queensland Planner 39 (2): 19.
2. Breckenridge (Town of), Colorado. 2003. Minutes of planning commission Feb 4, 2003. http://www.townofbreckenridge.com/cn_minutes_detail.cfm?minutes_id=178 (accessed March 21, 2004).
3. C & B Group. 2003. IPA Plan-making consultancy (Summary report). Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Department of Local Government & Planning.
4. Duany, A., and E. Talen. 2002. Making the good easy: The smart code alternative. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29 (4): 1445-1468.
5. Duerksen, G. 1996. Legal issues with performance zoning. In Performance standards for growth management. Planning Advisory Service Report no. 461. Chicago: American Planning Association.
6. England, P. 1999. Stakeholder views on IPA first phase implementation. Queensland Planner 39 (4): 28-30.
7. England, P. 2003. Integrated planning in Queensland. 2nd ed. Leichhardt, Australia: Federation Press.
8. Ericksen, N., P. R. Berke, J. L. Crawford, and J. E. Dixon. 2004. Plan-making for sustainability: The New Zealand experience. Hants, UK: Ashgate.
9. Exner, M., and R. Sawchuck. 1996. The performance-based planning model. Report prepared for the Town of Morinville, Alberta and the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. http://www.stepingstones.ab.ca.
10. Gleeson, B. J., and N. P. Low. 2000. Australian urban planning: New challenges, new agendas. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
11. Gleeson, B., and P. A. Memon. 1997. Community care: Implications for urban planning from the New Zealand experience. Planning Practice and Research 12 (2): 119-132.
12. Grundy, K. J., and B. Gleeson. 1996. Sustainable management and the market: The politics of planning reform in New Zealand. Land Use Policy 13 (3): 197-211.
13. Hamnett, S., and R. Freestone, eds. 2000. The Australian metropolis: A planning history. St. Leonards, Australia. Allen & and Unwin/E&FN Spon.
14. Hopewell, S. 2002. The role of planning schemes under the Integrated Planning Act (IPA). Queensland Planner 42 (3): 8-11
15. Horack, F. E. 1952/1972. Performance standards in residential zoning. In Land use policy: The central city, ed. R. B. Andrews, 74-80. New York: Free Press.
16. Jaffe, Martin. 1993. Performance zoning: A reassessment. Land Use Law, 45 (3): 3-9.
17. John A. Humphreys Associates. 2002. The code of development “twenty-five years after”: An evaluation of traditional zoning and performance based zoning systems. Breckenridge, CO: John A. Humphreys Associates.
18. Kendig, Lane. 1980. Performance zoning. Washington, DC: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
19. Leung, H.-L., and T. Harper. 2000. International experiences with performance based planning. Ottawa: Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
20. Memon, A., and B. Gleeson. 1995. Towards a new planning paradigm? Reflections on New Zealand's resource management act. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 22:109-124.
21. Moon, B. 1998. Reforming the Queensland land-use planning legislation. Australian Planner 35 (1): 24-30.
22. Nellis, L., and A. Richman. 1998. Performance zoning: Requiem or revolution? Videotape of a presentation at the Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute'Seventh Annual Conference, March 13, Denver, CO.
23. O'Harrow, D. 1951/1972. Performance standards in industrial zoning. In Land use policy: The central city, ed. R. B. Andrews, 64-73. New York: Free Press.
24. Paterson, J., D. Yencken, and G. Gunn. 1976. A mansion or no house. Melbourne, Australia: Hawthorn Press.
25. Porter, D. R. 1998. Flexible zoning: A status report on performance standard. Zoning News, January, pp. 1-4.
26. Porter, D. R., P. L. Phillips, and T. J. Lassar. 1988. Flexible zoning: How it works. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
27. Salzenstein, M. 1971. Industrial performance standards. PAS Report 272. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
28. Spiller, M. 2003. New Zealand's resource management act: An Australian perspective. Australian Planner 40 (2): 100-101.
29. Tallahassee's performance zoning gives way to Euclid. 1997. Planning 63 (12): 26-27.
30. Troy, P. N. 1976. Cities in a federation: The Whitlam Government and urban reforms. Royal Australian Planning Institute Journal 14:15-20.
31. Troy, P. N. 2000. Suburbs of acquiescence, suburbs of protest. Housing Studies 15 (5): 717-738.
32. Wypych, S. 2003. Performance based planning Queensland style. Paper presented at the Integrated Resource Management Conference, November 12-14, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
33. Wypych, S., N. Sipe, and D. Baker. Forthcoming. Performance-based planning in Queensland. Australian Planner.