Opting for Performance: An Alternative to Conventional Zoning for Land Use Regulation

Journal of Planning Literature

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 220-231

  Marwedel, James ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990348483     PISSN: 08854122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/088541229801300205     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Acker, Frederick W. 1991. Performance zoning. Notre Dame Law Review 67,2: 363-401.
2. Andrews, James. 1997. Tallahassee's performance zoning gives way to Euclid. Planning 63,12 (December): 26-27.
3. Annis, Tammy. 1995. 54-acre batch on block in Bedford. The Union Leader (August 28): B1-B1.
4. Arnold, Chester L., Jr., and C. James Gibbons. 1996. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 62, 2: 243-258.
5. Babcock, Richard F. 1984. The outlook for zoning. Urban Land 43, 11: 34-34.
6. Babcock, Richard F. 1966. The zoning game. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Blackweil, Robert J. 1989. Overlay zoning, performance standards, and environmental protection after Nolln. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 16, 3: 615-659.
8. Booth, Philip. 1995. Zoning or discretionary action: Certainty and responsiveness in implementing planning policy.Journal of Planning Eduation and Rsarch 14,2:104-118.
9. Connor, Susan Marie. 1983. Performance zoning: Successor to Euclidean zoning? In A planner's guide to land use law, Stuart Meck and Edith M. Netter, eds. Washington, DC: Planners Press.
10. Davidson, William. 1996. Performance standards and point systems in steommunies. In Perancess for growth management, Douglas R. Porter, ed. Chicago: American Planning Association.
11. Duerksen, Christopher J. 1996. Key legal issues in performance standards and zoning. In Pfornc standards for growth management, Douglas R. Portei. ed. Chicago: American Planning Association.
12. Eggers, William D. 1990. Land use refr through performance zoning. Policy study 120. Santa Monica, CA.4 Reason Foundation.
13. Ellickson Robert C. 1973. Alternatives to zoning. Covenants, nuisance rules, and fines as land use controls. Uniersity of Chicago Law Review 40,4: 681-781.
14. Frank, Michael J. 1982. Performance zoning: How it's doing in the place where it began. Planning 48, 11 (November): 21-23.
15. Fredland, Daniel R. 1980. Environmental performance zoning: An emerging trend? Urban Lawyer 12, 4: 678-699.
16. Freiden, Susan, and Richard Winters. 1997. Performance zoning helps key city's comeback American City and County 112, 6: 70-71.
17. Gerardi Natalie. 1973. The town that said no to no-growth. House and Home 44, 6: 62-69.
18. Jaffe,Martin. 1993. Performancezoning: Areassessment. Land UseLaw & Zoning Digest 45, 3: 3-9.
19. Juster, Robert J. 1997. From periptie to performance zoning. In Innovative govrt: Creative to local problems, Douglas J. Watson, ed. Westport, CT: Praeger
20. Kaiser Edward J., Karl Elfers, Sidney Cohn, Peggy A. Reichert, Maynard M. Hufschmidt, and Raymond E. Stanland. 1974. Promoting environmental quality through urban planning and controls. Washington, DC: US. Environmental Protection Agency.
21. Kendig, Lane IL 1982a. The Bucks County technique is slowly catching on. Planning 38, 11 (November): 24-24.
22. Kendig, Lane IL 1982b. Developers and performance zoning. Urban Land 41, 1: 18-21.
23. Kendig, Lane H., with Susan Connor, Cranston Byrd, and Judy Heyman. 1980. Perormance zoning. Washington, DC: Planners Press.
24. Kendig Lane H., and Barry L. Perkel. 1988. Performance zoning for sensitive land in Queen Anne's County, Maryland. Urban Land 47, 8:17-21.
25. Kmiec, Douglas W. 1981. Deregulating land use: An alternative free enter development system. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130,28:76-47.
26. Kunstler, James H. 1996. Home from nowhere: Remaking our everyday worldfor the 21st century. New York: Simon and Schuster.
27. Lake County Department of Planning. 1981. LAMCOG model performance zoning ordinance. Lake County, IL: Lake and McHenry Council of Governments.
28. Littlefield, Nicholas. 1995. At the heart of it: Performance zoning. The Union Leader (March 20): B1-B1.
29. Lynch, Kevin, and Phillip B. Herr. 1973. Performance zoning: The small town of Gay Head, Massachusetts, tries it. Planners Notebook 3,5:1-4.
30. McDougal Ill, Luther L. 1973. Performance standards: A viable alternative to Euclidean zoning? Tlane Law Review 47,2: 255-283.
31. Nelson, Janai S. 1996. Residential zoning regulations and the perpetuation of apartheid. UCLA Law Review 43,5: 1689-1730.
32. O'Harrow, Dennis. 1951. Performance standards in industrial zoning. In Planning 1951. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials 1951.
33. On-Site Insight. 1987. Worcester Master Plan: Performance zoning. Worcester, MA: On-Site Insight.
34. Pease, James R. 1979. Community growth management: Peformance zoning: An option for a small Oregon city. Extension circular 963. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service.
35. Pease, James R., and Michael Morgan. 1980. Performance zoning comes to Oregon. Planning 36, 8 (August): 22-24.
36. Phalen, Tam. 1983. How has performance zoning performed? Urban Land 42, 10: 16-21.
37. Porter Douglas R. 1998. Flexible zoning: A status report on performance standards. Zoning News January: 1-4.
38. Porter Douglas R. 1996. Managing performance in managing growth. In Peformance standards for growth management, Douglas R. Porter, ed. Chicago: American Planning Association.
39. Porter Douglas R. 1988a. Flexible zoning: How it works. Urban Land 47,4: 6-11.
40. Porter, Douglas R., Patrick L. Phillips, and TerryJ. Lassar. 1988. Flexible zoning: How it works. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
41. Reps, John W. 1964. Pomeroy Memorial Lecture: Requiem for zoning. In Planning 1964. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
42. Santi, Donna. 1997. Land protections added to zoning rules. Chicago Tribune (November 2): MC1-MC1.
43. Schwab, Jim. 1993. Industrial performance standards for a new century. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
44. Siegan, Bemard H. 1972. Land use without zoning. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
45. Stimson, J. Michael. 1972. Impact zoning. House and Home 42, 2: 58-67.
46. Stockham, John. 1974. Performance standards: A techniquefor controlling land use. Special report 424. Corvallis: Oregon State University Extension Service.
47. Thurow, Charles, William Toner, and Duncan Erley. 1975. Performance controls for sensitive lands: A practical guide for local administrators. Planning Advisory Service Reports 307-308. Chicago: American Society of Planning Officials.
48. Watson, Tracy H. 1976. A feasibility study for performance standard zoning in Austin, Texas. Master's thesis, Department of Community and Regional Planning University of Texas at Austin.
49. Wickersham, Kirk, Jr. 1978. Reform of discretionary land use decision-making: Point systems and beyond. Zoning and Planning Law Report 1,9: 65-71.