Not a Koala in Sight: Promotion and Spread of Eucalyptus

Cultural Geographies (formerly Ecumene)

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 200-214

  Doughty, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990344889     PISSN: 14744740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147447409600300205     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A. Danaiya, ‘Thailand: environmentalists vs. eucalyptus’, Inter Press Service, 24 Apr. 1990; A. Puntasen, ‘Political economy of eucalyptus: business, bureaucracy and the Thai Government’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 22 (1992), pp. 187–206.
2. A. W. Crosby, Ecological imperialism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986).
3. R. F. Zacharin, Emigrant eucalypts (Melbourne, Melbourne University Press, 1978), p. 43, Ann MAoyal, bright and savage land (Ringwood, Aust., Penguin, 1986), pp. 9–13.
4. Zacharin, Emigrant eucalypts, pp. 43–7; H. R. Fletcher, The story of the Royal Horticultural Society 1804-1968 (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 28.
5. See L. D. Pryor, The biology of eucalypts (London, Edward Arnold, 1976), pp. 1–2; W. E. Hillis, ‘Fast growing eucalypts and some of their characteristics’, in D. Werner and P. Muller, eds., Fast growing trees and nitrogen fixing trees (2nd edn, Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer, 1990), pp. 184–92.
6. A. Metro, Eucalypts for planting (Rome, UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 1955), pp. 31–2.
7. J. C. Loudon, Arboretum et fructicetum britannicum (London, Longman and others, 1938) II, pp. 958–9.
8. Zacharin, Emigrant eucalypts, pp. 60–3; anon., ‘Eucalypts in Scotland’, Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 60 (1896), pp. 515–31.
9. See Gardeners’ Chronicle, 14 Apr. 1856, p. 244; The Garden, 27 May 1876, p. 491; anon., Eucalypts in Scotland’, p. 523.
10. Zacharin, Emigrant eucalypts, p. 65.
11. P. Ramel, ‘L'eucalyptus globulus’, Bulletin de la Société d'Acclimatation 9 (1862), p.787; A. Kinney, Eucalyptus (Los Angeles, Baumgardt, 1895), p. 10, citing Planchon.
12. A. H. Chisholm, Ferdinand von Mueller (Melbourne, Oxford University Press, 1962), pp. 3–5; M. Willis, By their fruits: the life of Ferdinand von Mueller (Sydney, Angus & Robertson, 1949), pp. 181–2.
13. Chisholm, Mueller, p. 18.
14. E. Cooper, Forest culture and eucalyptus trees (San Francisco, Cubery, 1876); the subtitle states: ‘the only complete and reliable work on the Eucalypti published in the United States’, see pp. 33, 60-1, 63, 75, 601; V. L. Warren, ‘The eucalyptus crusade’, Southern California Quarterly 44 (1962), pp. 31–42.
15. A. J. McClatchie, Eucalypts cultivated in the United States (Washington, DC, GPO, 1902), p. 19; Warren, ‘Eucalyptus crusade’, p. 38; Kinney, Eucalyptus, p. 118.
16. McClatchie, Eucalypts, p. 31.
17. M. B. Pratt, ‘The use of lumber on California farms’, Univ. Calif. Agric. Exper. Station Bulletin 299 (Berkeley, University of California Press), p. 116.
18. E. Navarro de Andrade, ‘The eucalyptus in Brazil’, Journal of Heredity 32 (1941), pp. 215–20, at p. 215.
19. Id., ‘Acceptance speech’, Journal of Heredity 32 (1941), p. 213; A. Aubreville, ‘Quelques probl& egrave;mes forestiers du Brésil’, Bois et Forêts Tropicales 6 (1948), p. 114.
20. FAO Second World Eucalyptus Conference… Report and Documents (São Paulo, FAO, 1961) I, p. 61; D. Pilling, ‘Survey of world forest products’, Financial Times, 17 May 1994; C. E. Swann, ‘Market pulp powerhouse’, American P5aper7maker (Aug. 1994), p. 22.
21. J. C. Stier, ‘The world eucapulp industry and its impact on the northern U.S. pulp and paper industry’, NJAF 7 (1990), pp. 158–63; A. Lewington, Plants for people (New York, Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 54–5, 200.
22. FAO, ‘Pulp and paper-making properties of fast-growing plantation wood species’, FAO forestry paper 19/1 (1980), pp. 73, 117, 127, 173; Swann, ‘Market pulp’, p. 22 et passim, see also Latin Finance, Oct. 1994.
23. J. Evans, Plantation forestry in the tropics (2nd edn, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990), p. 35; F. Lapeyrie, ‘Controlled mycorrhizal inoculations of Eucalyptus: results and perspectives of applied research’, in Werner and Mueller, Fast growing trees, pp. 312–17.
24. H. B. Joshi, Troup's The silviculture of Indian trees (Delhi, Government of India Press, 1984) v pp.162–3.
25. R. Tiwari, ‘Cash-crop trees may damage environment’, Inter Press Service, 3 Oct. 1986; H. Lamb and S. Percy, ‘Indians fight eucalyptus plantations’, New Scientist 115 (July 1987), p. 31.
26. Environmental Defense Fund, ‘The failure of social forestry in Karnataka’, The Ecologist 17 (1987), pp. 151–5; S. S. Sunder and S. Parameswarappa, ‘Social forestry and eucalyptus’, Economic and Political Weekly, 7 Jan. 1989, pp. 51–2; L. Fortmann, ‘Great planting disasters: pitfalls in technical assistance in forestry’, Agriculture and Human Values 5 (1988), pp. 49–62.
27. K. Dixit, ‘Development: Greens rap IMF-World Bank's “destructive” vision’, Inter Press Service, 10 Oct. 1991; A. Boyd, ‘Bangkok to ease curbs on commercial timber farming’, Business Times, 29 June 1993; Puntasen, ‘Political economy’, pp. 187–206.
28. S. Magagnini, ‘Leads fight for Thai forests’, Sacramento Bee, 29 Nov. 1992.
29. D. Price, ‘Cash crop fights eucalyptus’, Benn Publications 219 (July 994), p. 32; ‘Pheonix removes pollution risk’, Benn Publications 219 (July 1994), p. 33.
30. L. Lohmann, ‘Commercial tree plantations in Thailand’, The Ecologist 20 (1990), pp. 9–17 at p. 13.
31. Metro, Eucalypts for planting, p. 1.
32. M. R. Jacobs, Eucalypts for planting (Rome, FAO, 1979).
33. D. J. Boland, M. I. H. Brooker, and J. W. Turnbull, Eucalyptus seed (Canberra, CSIRO, 1980), p. 3.
34. R. J. Streets, ‘Foreword’ in Exotic forest trees in the British Commonwealth (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962).
35. B. J. Zobel, G. Van Wyk, and P. Stahl, Growing exotic forests (New York, Wiley, 1987).
36. W. E. Hillis and A. G. Brown, Eucalypts for wood production (Sydney, Academic Press, 1984), p. 3.