Advances in Performance Assessment Methodology

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 291-293

  Hambleton, Ronald K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990338846     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01466210022031750     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bennett, R. E., & Ward, W. C. (Eds.). (1993). Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement: Issues in constructed response, performance testing, and portfolio assessment. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Brennan, R. L. (In press). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizabilityfor scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
4. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Parshall, C. G., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Innovative item types for computerized testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer.
7. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometric Monograph Supplement No. 17.
8. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. (Eds.). (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer.