The doctoral comprehensive examination: Fine-tuning the process

Counselor Education and Supervision

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 140-148

  Loughead, Teri Olisky ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990330902     PISSN: 00110035     EISSN: 15566978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1997.tb00539.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, L., (1994). Research on teaching and teacher education. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 126-145). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Anderson, W. P., Krauskopf, C. J., Rogers, M. E., and Neal, G. W., (1984). Reasons for comprehensive examination: A re-evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 11(2), 78-82.
3. Bloom, B. S., (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 1-8). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
4. Bloom, B. S., et al. (1994). Excerpts from the “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals: Handbook I: Cognitive domain.” In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 9-27). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R., (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational objectives: Handbook 1 Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green.
6. Burck, H. D., and Peterson, G. W., (1983). Doctoral comprehensive examinations in one program: A descriptive and evaluative study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 23, 169-172.
7. Furst, E. J., (1994). Bloom’s taxonomy: Philosophical and educational issues. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 28-40). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8. Khanna, P., and Khanna, J. L., (1972). Current status of the comprehensive examination: A survey. American Psychologist, 27, 761-765.
9. Kreitzer, A. E., and Madaus, G. F., (1994). Empirical investigations of the hierarchical structure of the taxonomy. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 64-81). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Manus, M. B., Bowden, M. G., and Dowd, E. T., (1992). The purpose, philosophy, content, and structure of doctoral comprehensive/qualifying exams: A survey of counseling psychology training programs. The Counseling Psychologist, 20, 677-688.
11. Merenda, P. F., (1974). Current status of graduate education in psychology. American Psychologist, 29, 627-631.
12. Peterson, S. E., Bowman, R. L., Myer, R. A., and Maidl, C. M., (1992). A survey of comprehensive examination practices among doctoral programs in counseling. Counselor Education and Supervision, 32, 116-129.
13. Postlethwaite, T. N., (1994). Validity vs. utility: Personal experiences with the taxonomy. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 164-173). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14. Rudolph, F., (1965). The American college and university: A history. New York: Knopf.
15. Sosniak, L. A., (1994). The taxonomy, curriculum, and their relations. In L. W.Anderson & L. A.Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective (pp. 103-125). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Thomason, T. C., Parks, J. C., and Bloom, J. W., (1980). The doctoral comprehensive examination in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 19, 182-185.
17. Wolensky, R. P., (1979). Comprehensive examinations and professional development. College Student Journal 13, 287-289.