Organizational communication in the 21st century: Informal Discussion with M. Scott Poole, Linda L. Putnam, and David R. Seibold

Management Communication Quarterly

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 127-138

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990324188     PISSN: 08933189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0893318997111006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bahrami, H. (1992). The emerging flexible organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 34(4), 33-52.
2. Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
3. Coleman, J. S. (1980). The structure of society and the nature of social research. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 332-350.
4. Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S. (1992). The virtual corporation: Structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. New York: Harper Business.
5. Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6. Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
7. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Gottfried, H., & Weiss, P. (1994). A compound feminist organization: Purdue University’s Council on the Status of Women. Women & Politics, 14, 23-44.
9. Handy, C. (1994). The age of paradox. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Hedberg, B. (1991). The role of information systems in imaginary organizations. In R. K. Stamper, P. Kercla, & K. Lyytinen (Eds.), Collaborative work social communications, and information systems (pp. 1-8). New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
11. Heydebrand, W. V. (1989). New organizational forms. Work & Occupations, 16, 323-357.
12. Kolb, D. M., & Putnam, L. L. (1997). Through the looking glass: Negotiation theory refracted through the lens of gender. In S. Gleason (Ed.), Frontiers in dispute resolution in industrial relations and human resources. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
13. Lammers, J. C., & Krikorian, D. H. (1997). Theoretical extension and operationalization of the bona fide group construct with an application to surgical teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 18-41.
14. Leveque, C., & Poole, M. S. (in press). Systems thinking in organizational communication inquiry. In P. Salem (Ed.), New directions in organizational communication research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
15. Perin, C. (1991). The moral fabric of the office: Panopticon discourse and schedule flexibilities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8, 241-268.
16. Poole, M. S. (in press). A turn of the wheel: The case for a renewal of systems inquiry in organizational communication research. In L. Thayer & G. Bamett (Eds.), Organizations-communication: Emerging perspectives V. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizations. In B. Staw & T. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18. Putnam, L. L. (1994). Challenging the assumptions of traditional approaches to negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 10, 337-346.
19. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
20. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Raiffa, H. (1982). The art & science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Redding, W. C., & Tompkins, P. K. (1988). Organizational communication-past and present tenses. In G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Bamett (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 5-33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Seibold, D. R. (1994). More reflection or more research?: To (re)vitalize small group communication research, let’s “just do it.” Communication Studies, 45, 103-110.
24. Seibold, D. R. (1995). Theoria and praxis: Means and ends in applied communication research. In K. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Seibold, D. R. (1996, November). Groups in organizations: Processes, perspectives, paradoxes, problems and practice. Paper presented as part of the “At the Helm Series” at the Speech Communication Association Convention, San Diego, CA.
26. Seibold, D. R. (in press). Groups and organizations: Premises and perspectives. In J. S. Trent (Ed.), Communication: Hewsfrom the helm for the twenty-first century. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Stohl, C. (1993). International organizing and organizational communication. Joumal of’ Applied Communication Research, 21, 377-384.
28. Taylor, J. R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Taylor, J. R. (1995). Shifting from a heteronomous to an autonomous worldview of organizational communication: Communication theory on the cusp. Communication Theory, 5, 1-35.
30. Taylor, J. R., Cooren, R., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6, 1-39.