A case study analysis of within district school funding inequities

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 69-77

  Necochea, Juan ^a   Cline, Zulmara ^b  

^a High school principal and grant writer for the Lompoc Unified School District   (United States)

^b CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990320892     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1066568960290208     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bailey, A. (1991). School finance litigation: A renewed impulse for reforms. Alexandria, VA: Publication of the National School Boards Association, p. 39.
2. Barro, St. M. (1989). Fund distribution issues in school finance: Priorities for the next round of research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(1), 17-30.
3. Buchser, L. (1982). School finance reform: The quest for equal educational opportunity, ERIC Document ED 256-068.
4. Chubb, J. & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, & America's schools, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
5. Cohn, E. & Geske, T. G. (1990). Economics of education, 3rd Edition. New York: Pergamon Press.
6. Coleman, J. S., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. CTA. (1992, March). L.A. settlement would result in massive teacher transfers. Unsigned article appearing in CTA Action, a publication of the California Teacher's Association Union.
8. Day, S. G. (1989). Public school financing: Is it fact or fiction? Planning & Changing, 20(4), 195-205.
9. DuPree v. Alma School District No. 30, 651 S.W.2d 90 (Arkansas 1983).
10. Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby, 777 S.W.2d 391 [56 Ed. Law Rep. 663] (Texas, 1989).
11. Ferguson, R. (1990). Racial patterns in how school and teacher quality affect achievement and learning. In Challenge: A Journal of Research on Black Men. Atlanta, GA: Morehouse Research Institute at Morehouse College.
12. Friedkin, N. & Necochea, J. (1988). School size and performance: A contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(3), 237-249.
13. Garms, W. & Kirst, M. (1972). The relationship between school expenditures and breadth of high school curriculum. Background paper for the Florida Governor's Commis. sion on Public Education.
14. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-51.
15. Helena Elementary School District No. 1 v. State, 769 684 (Montana 1989).
16. Horton v. Meskill, 376 A.2d 359 (Connecticut 1977).
17. Kearney, C. P. & Chen, L. J. (1990). Race and equality of opportunity: A school finance perspective. Journal of Educational Finance, 15(3), 333-350.
18. Kirst, M. W. (1983). A new school finance for a new era of fiscal constraint, Policy Paper No. 83-C4, Stanford University Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
19. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown Publishers.
20. Marcoulides, G. A. & Heck, R. H. (1990). Educational policy issues for the 1990s: Balancing equity and excellence in implementing the reform agenda. Urban Education, 25(1), 55-67.
21. Odden, A. (1990). The changing contours of school finance. Policy Briefs Number 15, ERIC Document ED 326-931. San Francisco: Far West Lab. for Educational Research, and Development.
22. Pauley v. Kelly, 255 S.E.2d (West Virginia 1979).
23. Peevely, G. L. & Ray, J. R. (1989). Equity as determined by locally funded teaching positions in Tennessee schools. Journal of Education Finance, 15(2), 189-204.
24. Phelps, J. L. & Addonizio, M. F. (1981). District power equalizing: Cure-all or prescription? Journal of Education Finance, 7(1), 64-87.
25. Roos, P. (1992, March 6). As quoted in the Los Angeles Times article by Sandy Banks entitled –Schools consider major change in funding methods,— p. Bl.
26. Rose v. The Council for Better Education, Inc., 760 S.W.2d 1986 (Kentucky 1989).
27. Rossmiller, R. A. (1986). School finance reform through litigation: Expressway or cul-de-sac? In T. Jones & D. Sem-ler (Eds.), School Law Update, ERIC Document ED 273-006.
28. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. (1973).
29. Seattle School District No. 1 v. State, 585 P.2d 71 (Washington 1978).
30. Serrano v. Priest, 487 P.2d 1241 (California 1971).
31. Shoemaker, J. S. (1983). Emerging role of educational foundations in financing education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.
32. Thompson, D. C. (1990). School finance and the courts: A reanalysis of progress. West's Education Law Reporter, 59(4), 945-961.
33. Timnick, L. (1992, April 26). Settlement would equalize school spending. The Los Angeles Times, pp. J1, J6.
34. Verstegen, D. A. & Salmon, R. G. (1989). The conceptualization & measurement of equity in school finance in Virginia. Journal of Education Finance, 15(2), 205-228.
35. Washakie County School District No.l v. Herschler, 600 P.2d 310 (Wyoming 1980).
36. Wise A. E. (1968). Rich schools, poor schools: The promise of equal educational opportunity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Wood, C. R. & Thompson, D. C. (1991). Recent school finance litigation strategies. School Business Affairs, 57(2), 22-25.