Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services a college of American pathologists Q-probes study of 81 institutions

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 140, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1098-1103

  McCall, Shannon J ^a   Souers, Rhona J ^b   Blond, Barbara ^c   Massie, Larry ^d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Department of Biostatistics ^*  (United States)

^c North Carolina   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL LABORATORY SERVICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGIST; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL LABORATORY SERVICES; HUMANS; PATHOLOGISTS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84990184971     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0486-CP     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Commission on Laboratory Accreditation, College of American Patholo-gists. Laboratory General Checklist. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; v072913. GEN.20335 Customer Satisfaction.
2. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Laboratory and Point-of-Care Testing. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission; 2013.
3. Tworek JA, Volmar KE, McCall SJ, Bashleben CP, Howanitz PJ. Q-Probes studies in anatomic pathology: quality improvement through targeted benchmarking. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(9):1156-1166.
4. Miller KA, Dale JC. Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Service 99-03: Q-Probes. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 1999.
5. Howanitz PJ. Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Services: Q-Probes Data Analysis and Critique. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 2002.
6. Jones BA, Bekeris LG, Nakhleh RE, Walsh PK, Valenstein PN; College of American Pathologists. Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 138 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(1):38-43.
7. Nyweide DJ, Lee W, Cuerdon TT, et al. Association of pioneer accountable care organizations vs traditional Medicare fee for service with spending, utilization, and patient experience. JAMA. 2015;313(21):2152-2161.
8. The Lewin Group: Wolcott J, Schwartz A, Goodman C. Laboratory Medicine: A National Status Report [prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]. May 2008.
9. Code of Federal Regulations Section 170.314(a)(ii). Electronic Code of Federal Regulations Web site. http://www.ecfr.gov. Accessed August 25, 2015.
10. Procop GW, Yerian LM, Wyllie R, Harrison AM, Kottke-Marchant K. Duplicate laboratory test reduction using a clinical decision support tool. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;141(5):718-723.
11. Baron JM, Dighe AS. Computerized provider order entry in the clinical laboratory. J Pathol Inform. 2011;2:35.
12. Galanter WL, DIdomenico RJ, Polikaitis A. A trial of automated decision support alerts for contraindicated medications using computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(3):269-274.
13. Feldman LS, Shihab HM, Thiemann D, et al. Impact of providing fee data on laboratory test ordering: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(10):903-908.
14. Muslin IS, Vardaman JM, Cornell PT. Fostering acceptance of computerized physician order entry: insights from an implementation study. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014;33(2):165-171.