Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Really More Accurate for Classifying Steatosis Than Controlled Attenuation Parameter?

Gastroenterology

Volumn 151, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 374-375

  Karlas, Thomas ^a   Petroff, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FATTY LIVER; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; LETTER; LIVER FIBROSIS; LIVER HISTOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RADIATION MEASUREMENT; RELIABILITY;

FATTY LIVER; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 84990040912     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: 15280012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.086     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. 1 Imajo, K., et al. Gastroenterology 150 (2016), 626–637.
2. 2 Bedossa, P., et al. J Hepatol 50 (2009), 1–3.
3. 3 Guiu, B., et al. Gut 61 (2012), 1369–1370.
4. 4 Boursier, J., et al. Hepatology 57 (2013), 1182–1191.
5. 5 Karlas, T., et al. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e91987.
6. 6 Angulo, P., et al. Gastroenterology 149 (2015), 389–397.
7. 7 Eckstedt, M., et al. Hepatology 61 (2015), 1547–1554.
8. 8 de Lédinghen, V., et al. J Hepatol 60 (2014), 1026–1031.