Comparison of automated atlas-based segmentation software for postoperative prostate cancer radiotherapy

Frontiers in Oncology

Volumn 6, Issue AUG, 2016, Pages

  Delpon, Grégory ^a   Escande, Alexandre ^b   Ruef, Timothée ^c   Darréon, Julien ^d   Fontaine, Jimmy ^a   Noblet, Caroline ^a   Supiot, Stéphane ^a   Lacornerie, Thomas ^b   Pasquier, David ^b,e  

^a CENTRE RENÉ GAUDUCHEAU   (France)

^b CENTRE OSCAR LAMBRET   (France)

^c Medical Physics Department   (France)

^d INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^e UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Atlas; Automatic segmentation; Contour comparison; Postoperative radiotherapy; Prostate bed

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED ATLAS BASED SEGMENTATION ALGORITHM; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; MALE; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 84990026646     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2234943X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00178     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bolla M, Collette L. pT3N0M0 prostate cancer: a plea for adjuvant radiation. Nat Rev Urol (2009) 6(8):410-2. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2009.103
2. Thoms J, Goda JS, Zlotta AR, Fleshner NE, van der Kwast TH, Supiot S, et al. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced and high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2010) 8(2):107-13. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.207
3. Buge F, Chiavassa S, Hervé C, Rigaud J, Delpon G, Supiot S. Preclinical evaluation of intraoperative low-energy photon radiotherapy using spherical applicators in locally advanced prostate cancer. Front Oncol (2015) 5:204. doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00204
4. Jaffray DA. Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2012) 9(12):688-99. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.194
5. Michalski JM, Lawton CA, El-Naqa I, Ritter M, O'Meara E, Seider MJ, et al. Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2010) 76(2):361-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.006
6. Hwee J, Louie AV, Gaede S, Bauman G, D'Souza D, Sexton T, et al. Technology assessment of automated atlas based segmentation in prostate bed contouring. Radiat Oncol (2011) 6:110. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-6-110
7. Lawton CA, Michalski JM, El-Naqa I, Kuban D, Lee WR, Rosenthal SA, et al. Variation in the definition of clinical target volumes for pelvic nodal conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2009) 74(2):377-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.003
8. Lawton CA, Michalski JM, El-Naqa I, Buyyounouski MK, Lee WR, Menard C, et al. RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2009) 74(2):383-7. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002
9. Livsey JE, Wylie JP, Swindell R, Khoo VS, Cowan RA, Logue JP. Do differences in target volume definition in prostate cancer lead to clinically relevant differences in normal tissue toxicity? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2004) 60(4):1076-81. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.005
10. Mitchell DM, Perry L, Smith S, Elliott T, Wylie JP, Cowan RA, et al. Assessing the effect of a contouring protocol on postprostatectomy radiotherapy clinical target volumes and interphysician variation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2009) 75(4):990-3. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.042
11. Jameson MG, Holloway LC, Vial PJ, Vinod SK, Metcalfe PE. A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol (2010) 54(5):401-10. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02192.x
12. Ost P, De Meerleer G, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, Veldeman L, Vandecasteele K, et al. Delineation of the postprostatectomy prostate bed using computed tomography: interobserver variability following the EORTC delineation guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2011) 81(3):e143-9. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.057
13. Malone S, Croke J, Roustan-Delatour N, Belanger E, Avruch L, Malone C, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2012) 84(3):725-32. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.081
14. Beckendorf V, Bachaud J-M, Bey P, Bourdin S, Carrie C, Chapet O, et al. Target-volume and critical-organ delineation for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: experience of French dose-escalation trials. Cancer Radiother (2002) 6(Suppl 1):78s-92s. doi:10.1016/S1278-3218(02)00217-2
15. Warfield SK, Zou KH, Wells WM. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (2004) 23(7):903-21. doi:10.1109/TMI.2004.828354
16. Pekar V, McNutt TR, Kaus MR. Automated model-based organ delineation for radiotherapy planning in prostatic region. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2004) 60:973-80. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(04)00964-2
17. Weistrand O, Svensson S. The ANACONDA algorithm for deformable image registration in radiotherapy. Med Phys (2015) 42(1):40-53. doi:10.1118/1.4894702
18. Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology (1945) 26:297-302. doi:10.2307/1932409
19. Gardner SJ, Wen N, Kim J, Liu C, Pradhan D, Aref I, et al. Contouring variability of human-and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol (2015) 60(11):4429-47. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4429
20. Larrue A, Gujral D, Nutting C, Gooding M. The impact of the number of atlases on the performance of automatic multi-atlas contouring. Phys Med (2015) 31(Suppl 2):e30. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.020