Digital forensics: the missing piece of the Internet of Things promise

Computer Fraud and Security

Volumn 2016, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 5-8

  Watson, Steve ^a   Dehghantanha, Ali ^b  

^a Denver   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL DEVICES; ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; INTERNET OF THINGS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

CONTROL AND MONITORING; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); IOT DEVICES; MONITORING CAPABILITIES; TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES; UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD;

DIGITAL FORENSICS;

EID: 84990026466     PISSN: 13613723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-3723(15)30045-2     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. 1 Liu, C, ‘Securing networks in the Internet of Things era’. Computer Fraud & Security, Apr 2015, 13–16 Accessed May 2016. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361372315300282.
2. 2 Daryabar, F; Dehghantanha, A; Udzir, NI; bin Shamsuddin, S. ‘Towards secure model for SCADA systems’. In Proceedings Title: 2012 International Conference on Cyber-security, Cyber Warfare and Digital Forensics (CyberSec), 60–64 (IEEE, 2012). doi: 10.1109/CyberSec.2012.6246111.
3. 3 Oriwoh, E; Jazani, D; Epiphaniou, G; Sant, P. ‘Internet of Things Forensics: Challenges and Approaches’. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, 608–615 (ICST, 2013). doi: 10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2013.254159.
4. 4 Tankard, C., ‘The security issues of the Internet of Things’. Computer Fraud & Security, Sep 2015, 11–14 Accessed May 2016. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361372315300841.