On the nature of the input in optimality theory

Linguistic Review

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 345-376

  Heck, Fabian ^a   Schmid, Tanja ^a   MüLler, Gereon ^b   Vogel, Ralf ^c   Fischer, Silke ^d   Vikner, Sten ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b IDS Mannheim   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989776796     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/tlir.2002.003     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackema, Peter, and Ad Neeleman (1998). Optimal questions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 443–490.
2. Archangeli, Diana and D. Terence Langendoen eds. (1997). Optimality Theory: An Overview. London: Blackwell.
3. Baker, Carl L. (1970). Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219.
4. Bakovic, Eric and Ed Keer (2001). Optionality and ineffability. In Optimality-Theoretic Syntax, Géraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw and Sten Vikner (eds.), 97–112. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
5. Benua, Laura (1997). Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
6. Blutner, Reinhard (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Ms., Humboldt Universität Berlin.
7. Bresnan, Joan (2000). Optimal syntax. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van der Weijer (eds.), 334–385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bromberger, Sylvain and Morris Halle (1989). Why phonology is different. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 51–70.
9. Burzio, Luigi (1996). Surface Constraints versus Underlying Representation. In Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, Jacques Durand and Bernard Laks (eds.), 97–122. University of Salford Publications.
10. Bye, Patrik (2001). Virtual phonology: Rule sandwiching and multiple opacity in North Saami. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Troms0.
11. Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
13. Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
14. Fanselow, Gisbert and Damir Cavar (2001). Remarks on the economy of pronunciation. In Competition in Syntax, Gereon Müller and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), 107–150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Fischer, Silke (2001). Reanalyzing reconstruction effects: An optimality-theoretic account of the relation between pronouns and R-expressions. To appear in Proceedings of ConSOLE 9.
16. Frampton, John, and Sam Gutman (1999). Cyclic computation. Syntax 2: 1–27.
17. Goldrick, Matthew (2000). Turbid output representations and the unity of opacity. In Proceedings of NELS 30. Masako Hirotani and Andries Coetzee and Nancy Hall and Ji-Yung Kim (eds.), 231–245. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA.
18. Grimshaw, Jane (1997). Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–422.
19. Grimshaw, Jane (1997). The best clitic: Constraint conflict in morphosyntax. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 169–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
20. Grimshaw, Jane and Vieri Samek-Lodovici (1998). Optimal subjects and subject universials. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Barbosa, Pilar, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky (eds.), 193–219. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
21. Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonological Restructuring in Yidi$$ and its theoretical consequences. In The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory. Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), 175–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Heck, Fabian and Gereon Müller (2000). Repair-driven movement and the local optimization of derivations. Ms., Universität Stuttgart and IDS Mannheim.
23. Kager, René (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kenstowicz, Michael and Charles Kisseberth (1979). Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.
25. Kuhn, Jonas (2001). Formal and computational aspects of optimality-theoretic syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Stuttgart.
26. Lee, Hanjung (2001). Optimization in argument expression and interpretation: A unified approach. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
27. Legendre, Géraldine, Colin Wilson, Paul Smolensky, Kristin Homer and William Raymond (1995). Optimality and Wh-extraction. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh-Dickie and Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), 607–634. Amherst, Massachusetts: GSLA.
28. Legendre, Géraldine, Paul Smolensky and Colin Wilson (1998). When is less more? Faithfulness and minimal links in wh-chains. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Barbosa, Pilar, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky (eds.), 249–289. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
29. McCarthy, John (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16: 331–399.
30. McCarthy, John (2000). Harmonic serialism and harmonic parallelism. In Proceedings of NELS 30, Masako Hirotani, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall, and Ji-Yung Kim (eds.) 501–524. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA.
31. McCarthy, John and Alan Prince (1993). Prosodic morphology I – Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.
32. McCarthy, John and Alan Prince (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh-Dickie and Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), 249–384. Amherst, Massachusetts: GSLA.
33. McCarthy, John and Alan Prince (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity in prosodic morphology. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.
34. Mester, Armin (1999). Weak parallelism: Serial and parallel sources of opacity in OT. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.
35. Müller, Gereon (1997). Partial Wh-movement and optimality theory. The Linguistic Review 14: 249–306.
36. Müller, Gereon (2000). Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
37. Müller, Gereon (2000). Shape conservation and remnant movement. In Proceedings of NELS 30, Masako Hirotani, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall, and Ji-Yung Kim (eds.), 525–539. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA.
38. Pesetsky, David (1998). Optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Barbosa, Pilar, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky (eds.), 337–383. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
39. Pinsker, Hans Ernst (1959). Historische Englische Grammatik. München: Max Hueber.
40. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality theory. Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder.
41. Roberts, Ian (1998). Have/be raising, move F, and procrastinate. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 113–125.
42. Ross, Alan (1965). Etymology: With Special Reference to English. London: Methuen.
43. Rubach, Jerzy (2000). Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languagues: A DOT analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 271–317.
44. Schmid, Tanja (1999). West Germanic Infinitivus Pro Participio (IPP) constructions in Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of ConSole VII, Tina Cambier-Langeveld, Anikó Lipták, Michael Redford and Erik Jan van der Torre (eds.), 229–244. Leiden: Sole.
45. Sells, Peter (2002). Structure, Alignment, and Optimality in Swedish. Stanford: CSLI publications.
46. Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1997). Comparing reference sets. In The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gärtner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), 81–114. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
47. Tesar, Bruce and Paul Smolensky (2000). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press.
48. Vikner, Sten (1997). The interpretation of object shift, optimality theory, and minimalism. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60: 1–24.
49. Vogel, Ralf (2001). Case conflict in German free relative constructions. An optimality theoretic treatment. In Competition in Syntax, Gereon Müller and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), 341–376. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. Vogel, Ralf (2001). Word order freezing as MLC effect in bidirectional OT. Ms., Universität Stuttgart.
51. Williams, Edwin (1986). A reassignment of the functions of LF. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 265–300.
52. Wilson, Colin (2000). Consonant cluster neutralization and targeted constraints. Doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
53. Wilson, Colin (2001). Bidirectional Optimization and the Theory of Anaphora. In Optimality Theoretic Syntax, Jane Grimshaw, Géraldine Legendre and Sten Vikner (eds.), 465–507. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.