The skewness of science

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 1992, Pages 628-638

  Seglen, Per O ^a,b  

^a Nordic Institute for Studies of Innovation Research and Education   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989533561     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: 10974571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Publication productivity: from frequency distributions to scientometric indicators
2. Lotka's frequency distribution of scientific productivity
3. Citation analysis
4. The hierarchy of the sciences
5. Science Citation Index and chemistry
6. Differences in impact of scientific publications: Some indices derived from a citation analysis
7. Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis
8. Price distribution. An exact formulation of Price's “square root law
9. Publishing by—and for? —the numbers
10. Research papers: Who's uncited now
11. Structural determinants of stratification in science
12. When more is less: Quantity versus quality of publications in the evaluation of academic vitae
13. The generalized Waring distribution. Part I
14. Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law
15. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity
16. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review
17. Bibliometric analysis of a new research sub‐field
18. The Matthew effect in science
19. The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field‐ and time‐dependent factors to be considered
20. Measures of scientific growth
21. Power law relations in science bibliography—a self‐consistent interpretation
22. Structure of the bio‐medical literature
23. An empirical examination of Lotka's law
24. The citing practices of the authors to the national journals in mathematics, physics, and chemistry
25. Networks of scientific papers
26. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
27. Approximating total citation counts from first author counts and from total papers
28. Evaluering av forskningskvalitet ved hjelp av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder
29. From bad to worse: evaluation by journal impact
30. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet
31. Kan siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder brukes til evaluering av forskningskvalitet?
32. Die Evaluierungvon Wissenschaftlern anhand des 'journal impact
33. On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories
34. A bibliometric distribution which really works
35. A re‐examination of the Ortega hypothesis: the Dutch case