What is political discourse analysis?

Belgian Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 11-52

  van Dijk, Teun A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989404204     PISSN: 07745141     EISSN: 15699676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij     Document Type: Article

References (180)

1. Abadi, A. 1990. The Speech Act of Apology in Political Life. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 467-471
2. Agar, M. H. 1987. Political talk: Thematic analysis of a policy argument. In L. Kedar ed, Power through discourse'. 113-126. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
3. Akioye, A. A. 1994. The Rhetorical Construction of Radical Africanism at the United-Nations: Metaphoric Cluster as Strategy. Discourse & Society 5(1): 7-31
4. Allcock, J. B. 1989. In Praise of Chauvinism: Rhetorics of Nationalism in Yugoslav Politics. Third World Quarterly 11(4): 208-222
5. Allen, J. 1991. Thematic Repetition as Rhetorical Technique. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 21(1): 29-40
6. Atkinson, J. M. 1984. Our masters voices: the language and body language of politics. London: Methuen
7. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Aufderheide, P. ed. 1992. Beyond PC. Towards a politics of understanding. Saint Paul, MN: Graywolf Press
9. Bennett, D. H. 1990. The party of fear: from nativist movements to the New Right in American history. New York: Vintage Books
10. Bennett, W. L., & Paletz, D. L. eds. 1994. Taken by storm. The media, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
11. Berman, P. ed. 1992. Debating P.C. The Controversy over Political Correctness on College Campuses. New York: Dell (Laurel Paperback)
12. Billig, M. 1986. Very ordinary life and the Young Conservatives. In H. Beloff (ed) Getting Into Life. London: Methuen
13. Billig, M. 1988. Rhetoric of the conspiracy theory: arguments in National Front propaganda. Patterns of Prejudice 22: 23-34
14. Billig, M. 1991b. Ideology and Opinions: studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage
15. Billig, M. 1995a. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage
16. Billig, M. 1995b. Socio-psychological aspects of nationalism: imagining ingroups, others and the world of nations. In K. von Benda-Beckmann & M. Verkuyten (eds)Collective Identities and Development in Europe. London: University of London Press
17. Bitzer, L. 1981. Political rhetoric. In D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders eds, Handbook of political communication: 225-248. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
18. Blommaert, J. 1994. The metaphors of development and modernization in Tanzanian language policy and research. In R. Fardon, & G. Fumiss (eds), African languages, development and the state: 213-226. London: Routledge
19. Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. 1991. The Pragmatics of Minority Politics in Belgium. Language in Society 20(4): 503-531
20. Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. 1992. The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics 2(3), 355-375
21. Blommaert, J., & Verschueren, J. 1992. Het Belgische Migrantendebat: De pragmatiek van de abnormalisering. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association
22. Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. H. eds. 1991 Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press
23. Boynton, G. R. 1991. When senators and publics meet at the Environmental Protection Subcommittee. Discourse & Society 2: 131-156
24. Brown, W. 1988. Supposing Truth Were a Woman… Plato Subversion of Masculine Discourse. Political Theory 16(4): 594-616
25. Bruce, D. D. 1982. The rhetoric of conservatism: the Virginia Convention of 1829-30 and the conservative tradition in the South. Los Angeles: Huntington Lib
26. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. 1979. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 97-109
27. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. 1990. Deeds done in words: presidential rhetoric and the genres of governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
28. Carbó, T. 1984. Educar desde la Cámara de Diputados. Mexico: CIESAS
29. Castañeda, A. I. 1992. Women of Color and the Rewriting of Western History: The Discourse, Politics, and Decolonization of History. Pacific Historical Review61(4): 501-533
30. Chaffee, S. H. ed 1975. Political communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
31. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. 1976. Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34:605-614
32. Cheney, G. 1993. We’re Talking War: Symbols, Images, and Strategies in Discourse about the Persian Gulf War. In B. Greenberg, & W. Gantz eds, The Media and Desert Storm. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
33. Chilton, P. 1985. Words, Discourse and Metaphors: The Meanings of Deter, Deterrent and Deterrence. In P. Chilton ed, Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today: 103-127. London: Pinter
34. Chilton, P. 1987. Metaphor, Euphemism and the Militarization of Language. Current Research on Peace and Violence 10(1): 7-19
35. Chilton, P. 1988. Orwellian language and the media. London: Pluto Press
36. Chilton, P. 1995. Security metaphors. Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Lang
37. Chilton, P., & Ilyin, M. 1993.Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the common European house. Discourse & Society 4(1): 7-32
38. Clark, T. D. 1979. An Analysis of Recurrent Features of Contemporary American Radical, Liberal, and Conservative Political Discourse. Southern Speech Communication Journal 44(4), 399-422
39. Clinton, W. D. ed. 1988. National interest: rhetoric, leadership, and policy. Washington, DC: University Press of America
40. Coates, J. 1990. Modal Meaning: The Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Journal of Semantics 7(1): 53-63
41. Condit, C. M. 1987. Democracy and Civil-Rights: The Universalizing Influence of Public Argumentation. Communication Monographs 54: 1-18
42. Derian, J. D., & Shapiro, M. J. 1989. International/Inter textual relations. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath
43. Detrez, R., & Blommaert, J. eds 1994. Nationalisme: Kritische opstellen. Berchem: EPO
44. Dillon, G. L., Doyle, A., Eastman, C. M., Kline, S., Silberstein, S., & Toolan, M. (WAUDAG). 1990. The Rhetorical Construction of a President. Discourse and Society 1(2): 189-200
45. Dolan, F. M., & Dumm, T. L. eds. 1993. Rhetorical republic. Governing representations in American politics. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press
46. Dorrien, G. J. 1993. The neoconservative mind. Politics, culture, and the war of ideology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press
47. Dryzek, J. S. 1990. Discursive democracy. Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
48. Edelman, M. J. 1977. Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press
49. Edelman, M. J. 1985. The symbolic uses of politics. Second Edition. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
50. Eelen, G. 1993. Authority in international political discourse: A pragmatic analysis of United Nations documents on the Congo Crisis (1960). Text 13(1): 29-63
51. Entman, R. M. 1991. Framing United-States Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication 41(4): 6-27
52. Fairclough, N. L. 1994. Conversationalisation of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In N. Abercrombie, R. Keat & N. Whiteley (eds)The Authority of the Consumer. London: Routledge
53. Fairclough, N. L. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: Papers in the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman
54. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. eds. 1993. The Argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke Univ. Press
55. Fish, S. E. 1994. There’s no such thing as free speech… and it’s a good thing too. New York: Oxford University Press
56. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. 1979. Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
57. Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. 1995. Postmodern public administration. Toward discourse. London: Sage
58. Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
59. Frédéric, M. 1985. La répétition. Etude linguistique et rhétorique. Tübingen: Niemeyer
60. Gamson, W. A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
61. Geis, M. L. 1987. The language of politics. New York: Springer
62. Gräber, D. A. 1981. Political languages. In: D. D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (eds). Handbook of Political communication: 195-223. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
63. Greenberg, B. S., & Gantz, W. eds. 1993. Desert Storm and the mass media. Cresskill: Hampton Press
64. Gruber, H. 1993. Political Language and Textual Vagueness. Pragmatics 3(1): 1-29
65. Hackett, R. A., & Zhao, Y. Z. 1994. Challenging a Master Narrative: Peace Protest and Opinion Editorial Discourse in the United-States Press During the Gulf-War. Discourse & Society 5(4): 509-541
66. Hall, S. 1988. The hard road to renewal. Thatcherism and the crisis of the left. London: Verso
67. Halmari, H. 1993. Dividing the World: The Dichotomous Rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. Multilingua 12(2): 143-176
68. Harris, S. 1991. Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (ed) Broadcast talk: 76-99. London: Sage
69. Hart, R. P. 1984. Verbal style and the presidency: A computer-based analysis. New York: Academic Press
70. Hennessy, R. 1993. Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse. London: Routledge
71. Heritage, J. C., & Greatbatch, D. 1986. Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences. American Journal of Sociology 92: 110-157
72. Herman, E. S. 1992. Beyond hypocrisy. Decoding the news in an age of propaganda: including A doublespeak dictionary for the 1990s. Boston, MA: South End Press
73. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. 1988. Manufacturing consent. The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books
74. Himmelstein, J. L. 1990. To the right: the transformation of American conservatism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
75. Hirschman, A. O. 1991. The rhetoric of reaction. Perversity, futility and jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
76. Holly, W. 1990. Politikersprache. Inszenierungen und Rollenkonflikte im informellen Sprachhandeln eines Bundestagsabgeordneten. Berlin: De Gruyter
77. Houston, M., & Kramarae, C. eds. 1991. Women speaking from silence. Discourse & Society 2(4): special issue
78. Hovland, C. I., Luchins, A. S., Mandell, W., Campbell, E. H., Brock, T. C., McGuire, W. J., Feierabend, R. L., Anderson, N. H., eds. 1957. The order of presentation in persuasion. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press
79. Howe, N. 1988. Metaphor in Contemporary American Political Discourse. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 3(2): 87-104
80. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. 1993. News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public-Opinion: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing. Communication Research 20(3): 365-383
81. Jäger, S. 1988. Rechtsdruck. Die Presse der neuen Rechten. Bonn: Dietz
82. Jäger, S. 1992. BrandSätze. Rassismus im Alltag. DISS-Studien. Duisburg: DISS
83. Jefferson, G. 1972. Side sequences. In D. Sudnow ed, Studies in social interaction: 294-338. New York: Free Press
84. Jeffords, S., & Rabinovitz, L. eds. 1994. Seeing through the media. The Persian Gulf War. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
85. Johannesen, R. L. 1985. An ethical assessment of the Reagan rhetoric: 1981-1982. In K. R. Sanders. L. L. Kaid, & D. Nimmo (eds) Political communication yearbook:226-241. Carböndale: Southern Illinois University Press
86. Johnstone, B. ed. 1994. Repetition in discourse. Interdisciplinary perspectives. 2 vols. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
87. Kaid, L. L., Downs, V. C., & Ragan, S. 1990. Political argumentation and violations of audience expectations: An analysis of the Bush-Rather encounter. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 34(1): 1-15
88. Kaplan, E. A. 1989. Women, morality, and social change from a discourse analysis perspective. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (eds) Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives: 347-361. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
89. Kellner, D. 1992. The Persian Gulf TV war. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
90. Kiewe, A. ed. 1994. The Modern presidency and crisis rhetoric. New York: Praeger
91. Knowles, C. 1992. Race, discourse, and labourism. London: Routledge
92. Korzenny, F., & Ting-Toomey, S. eds. 1990. Communicating for peace. Diplomacy and negotiation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
93. Kress, G., & Hodge, B. 1993. Language as ideology. Second Edition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
94. Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. eds. 1986. Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
95. Lazar, M. M. 1993. Equalizing gender-relations: a case of double-talk. Discourse & Society 4(4): 443-465
96. Lemke, J. L. 1995. Textual politics. Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis
97. Lycan, W. G. 1994. Modality and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Pubs
98. Maas, U. 1984. “Als der Geist der Gemeinschaft eine Sprache fand”: Sprache im Nationalsozialismus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
99. Maddox, G., & Hagan, S. 1987. A New Sophistry: The Rhetoric of the New Right. Politics 22(2): 29-35
100. Maitland, K., & Wilson, J. 1987. Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 11(4): 495-512
101. Martin Rojo, L. 1995. Division and rejection: from the personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonisation of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society 6(1): 49-79
102. Maynard, S. K. 1993. Discourse modality. Subjectivity, emotion, and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam: Benjamins
103. Maynard, S. K. 1994. Images of Involvement and Integrity: Rhetorical Style of a Japanese Politician. Discourse and Society 5(2): 233-261
104. McGee, M. C. 1985. Some issues in the rhetorical study of political communication. In K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid, & D. Nimmo (eds) Political communication yearbook 1984: 155-182. Carböndale: Southern Illinois University Press
105. Meeuwis, M. 1993. Nationalist ideology in news reporting on the Yugoslav crisis: a pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 20(3): 217-237
106. Mumby, D. K., & Spitzack, C. 1983. Ideology and television news: A metaphoric analysis of political stories. Central States Speech Journal 34: 162-171
107. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. 1994. Voters’ reasoning processes and media influences during the Persian Gulf War. Political Behavior 16(1): 117-156
108. Read, S. J., Cesa, I. L., Jones, D. K., & Collins, N. L. 1990. When Is the Federal-Budget Like a Baby: Metaphor in Political Rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 5(3): 125-149
109. Reboul, O. 1975. Is slogan. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe
110. Rosengren, K. E. ed. 1981. Advances in content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
111. Rozell, M. J., & Pontuso, J. F. eds. 1990. American conservative opinion leaders. Boulder: CO: Westview Press
112. Schäffner, C. 1985. Zur Bedeutungsdifferenzierung des Wortes peace. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 35(4): 360-367
113. Schäffner, C., & Wenden, A. L., eds. 1995. Language and peace. Aldershot: Dartmouth
114. Schram, S. F. 1993. Postmodern Policy Analysis: Discourse and Identity in Welfare Policy. Policy Sciences 26(3): 249-270
115. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., & Bobo, L. 1985. Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
116. Sears, D. O. 1993. Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. In S. Iyengar, & W. J. McGuire (eds) Explorations in political psychology. Duke studies in political psychology: 113-149. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
117. Seidel, G. 1987. The White Discursive Order: The British New Right’s Discourse on Cultural Racism with Particular Reference to the Salisbury Review. In I. M. Zavala, T. A. van Dijk, & D. M. Diaz (eds) Approaches to Discourse, Poetics and Psychiatry: 39-66. Amsterdam: Benjamins
118. Seidel, G. 1988a. The British New Right’s “Enemy Within”: The anti-racists. In Smitherman-Donaldson & van Dijk (eds): 131-143
119. Seidel, G. 1988b. Verbal strategies of the collaborators. A discursive analysis of the July 1986 European Parliament debate on South African sections. TEXT 8: 111-128
120. Seidel, G. 1988c. The nature of the right. A feminist analysis of order patterns. Amsterdam: Benjamins
121. Shakir, A., & Farghal, M. 1992. Gulf War Jokes: Cohesion and Coherence. Text 12(3): 447-468
122. Sidanius, J., & Liu, J. H. 1992. The Gulf War and the Rodney King beating: Implications of the general conservatism and social dominance perspectives. Journal of Social Psychology 132(6): 685-700
123. Silverman, M., ed. 1991. Race, discourse and power in France. Aldershot: Avebury
124. Skjeie, H. 1991. The Rhetoric of Difference: On Women’s Inclusion into Political Elites. Politics & Society 19(2): 233-263
125. Smit, P. A. 1989. An Argumentation-Analysis of a Central Part of Lenin Political Logic. Communication and Cognition 22: 357-374
126. Smitherman-Donaldson, G., & Van Dijk, T. A., eds. 1988. Discourse and discrimination. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press
127. Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. 1990. Reality negotiation and excuse-making: President Reagan’s 4 March 1987 Iran Arms Scandal Speech and other literature. In Michael J. Cody, & Margaret L. McLaughlin eds, The psychology of tactical communication. Monographs in social psychology of language 2: 207-228. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
128. Solomos, J., & Wrench, J. 1993. Racism and migration in Western Europe. Oxford: Berg
129. Strauber, I. L. 1986. The Rhetoric of an Ordinary Political Argument: Liberalism and Zionism. Western Political Quarterly 39(4): 603-622
130. Stuckey, M. E. 1989. Getting into the game: the pre-presidential rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. New York: Praeger
131. Stuckey, M. E. 1990. Playing the game: the presidential rhetoric of Ronald Reagan. New York: Praeger
132. Sunic, T. 1990. Against democracy and equality: the European New Right. New York: Peter Lang
133. Swanson, D. L., & Nimmo, D. D., eds. 1990. New directions in political communication: a resource book. London: Sage
134. Tetlock, P. E. 1984. Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 365-375
135. Tetlock, P. E. 1993. Cognitive structural analysis of political rhetoric: Methodological and theoretical issues. In S. Iyengar, & W. J. McGuire (eds) Explorations in political psychology. Duke studies in political psychology: 380-405. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
136. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. 1989. Cognitive and Rhetorical Styles of Traditionalist and Reformist Soviet Politicians: A Conient-Analysis Study. Political Psychology 10: 209-232
137. Thompson, K. W. 1987a. MoraI and political discourse: theory and practice in international relations. Washington, DC: University Press of America
138. Thompson, K. W., ed. 1987b. Discourse on policy-making: American foreign policy. Washington, DC: University Press of America
139. Thompson, K. W., ed. 1987c. Rhetoric and public diplomacy: the Stanton report revisited. Washington, DC: University Press of America
140. Thompson, K. W., ed. 1987d. The History and philosophy of rhetoric and political discourse. Washington, DCUniversity Press of America
141. Thompson, K. W., ed. 1987e. To form or preserve a government: the presidency, the Congress, and political discourse. Washington, DC: University Press of America
142. Trognon, A., & Larrue, J., eds. 1994. Pragmatique du discours politique. Paris: A. Colin
143. van Dijk, T. A. 1980. Macrostructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
144. van Dijk, T. A. 1987. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
145. van Dijk, T. A. 1988. The Tamil panic in the press, in T. A. Van Dijk, News Analysis. Case studies of international and national news in the press.215-254. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
146. van Dijk, T. A. 1991. Racism and the press. London: Routledge
147. van Dijk, T. A. 1993a. Analyzing racism through discourse analysis: Some methodological reflections. In J. H. Stanfield II, & R, M. Dennis (eds) Race and ethnicity in research methods: 92-134.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
148. van Dijk, T. A. 1993b. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 249-83
149. van Dijk, T. A. 1993c. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc
150. van Dijk, T. A. 1995a. Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society 6(2): 243-289
151. van Dijk, T. A. 1995b. The mass media today: Discourses of domination or diversity? Javnost/The Public (Ljubljana), 2(2): 27-45
152. van Dijk, T. A. 1996. Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis: 84-104. London: Routledge
153. van Dijk, T. A., ed. 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. 3. Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press
154. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. 1993. Citizen Activity: Who Participates: What Do They Say. American Political Science Review 87(2): 303-318
155. Verschueren, J. 1994. De pragmatiek van Europese nationalistische ideologieen. In R. Detrez, & J. Blommaert (eds): 92-101
156. Villiers, A. D. 1987. Legislating for Women’s Rights and Conservative Rhetoric: Lessons for Feminists. Australian Quarterly 59(2): 128-144
157. Volmert, J. 1989. Politikerrede als kommunikatives Handlungsspiel. Ein integriertes Modell zur semantisch-pragmatischen Beschreibung ojfentlicher Rede. München: Fink
158. Wallace, M. D., Suedfeld, P., & Thachuk, K. 1993. Political Rhetoric of Leaders Under Stress in the Gulf Crisis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(1): 94-107
159. Whillock, R. K., & Slay den, D., eds. 1995. Hate speech. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
160. Williams, C. H. 1994. Called unto liberty! On language and nationalism. Multilingual Matters 104
161. Williams, J., ed. 1995. PC Wars. Politics and theory in the academy. New York: Routledge
162. Wilson, J. 1990. Politically speaking. Cambridge: Blackwell
163. Wilson, J. 1991. The Linguistic Pragmatics of Terrorist Acts. Discourse and Society 2(1), 29-45
164. Windisch, U. 1978. Xénophobie? Logique de la pensée populaire. Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme
165. Windisch, U. 1982. Pensée sociale, langage en usage et logiques autres. Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme
166. Windisch, U. 1985. Le raisonnement et le parler quotidiens. Lausanne: L’Age d’Homme
167. Windisch, U. 1990. Speech and Reasoning in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
168. Windisch, U. 1995. Communication et argumentation politiques quotidiennes en démocratie directe. Paris: Hermès
169. Windt, T. 1983. Presidential rhetoric, 1961 to the present. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt
170. Windt, T. 1990. Presidents and protesters: political rhetoric in the 1960s. Anchorage: University of Alaska Press
171. Windt, T., & Ingold, B., eds. 1987. Essays in presidential rhetoric. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt
172. Winter, J. 1993. Gender and the Political Interview in an Australian Context. Journal of Pragmatics 20(2): 117-139
173. Wodak, R. 1991. Turning the tables: Anti-semitic discourse in post-war Austria. Discourse & Society 2: 65-84
174. Wodak, R., & Menz, F., eds. 1990. Sprache in der Politik - Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. Klagenfurt: Drava
175. Wodak, R., Nowak, P., Pelikan, J., Gruber, H., de Cillia, R., & Mitten, R. 1990. “Wir sind alle unschuldige Tater”. Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp
176. Yeganeh, N. 1993. Women, Nationalism and Islam in Contemporary Political Discourse in Iran. Feminist Review 44: 3-18
177. Zarefsky, D. 1986. President Johnson’s war on poverty: rhetoric and history. Alabama: University of Alabama Press
178. Zashin, E., & Chapman, P. C. 1974. The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political Language. Journal of Politics 36(2): 290-326
179. Zerilli, L. M. G. 1991. Machiavelli Sisters: Women and the Conversation of Political-Theory. Political Theory 19(2): 252-276
180. Zupnik, Y. J. 1994. A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 21(4): 339-38