Lingua: The language-independent neighbourhood generator of the university of alberta

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 271-284

  Westbury, Chris F ^a   Hollis, Geoff ^a   Shaoul, Cyrus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989402485     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.2.2.09wes     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity ororthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and-Cognition, 18, 234-254.
2. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolvingneigh-borhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
3. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access?The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 340-357.
4. Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. Proceedings of LREC 2004.
5. Biederman, G. B. (1966). The recognition of tachistoscopically presented five-letter words as afunction of digram frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 208-209.
6. Binder, J., Medler, D., Westbury, C., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L. (2006). Tuning of thehuman left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage, 33(2), 739-748
7. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
9. Frisch, S. A, Large, N. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000) Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment-Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords, Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 481-496.
10. Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences onshort-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 25(1), 84-95.
11. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexicalfa-miliarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 256-281.
12. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in readinga-loud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
13. Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Peterson, J. (2006). NUANCE 3.0: Using Genetic Programming to-Model Variable Relationships. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 218-228.
14. Jared, D. (1997). Consistency effects in high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
15. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. (1990). Naming multi-syllabic words. Journal of ExperimentalPsy-chology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 92-105.
16. Jared, F., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in wordnaming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
17. McClelland, J. L., & Johnson, J. C. (1977). The role of familiar units in the perception of word-sand nonwords. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.
18. Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation orsublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 409-421.
19. Rice, G. A., & Robinson, D. O. (1975). The role of bigram frequency in perception of words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 3, 513-518.
20. Roodenrys S., & Hinton M. (2002). Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28(1), 29-33.
21. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L. & Millikian, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internallexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
22. Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). Processes of recognizing tachistoscopically presentedwords. Psychological Review, 81, 99-118.
23. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900.
24. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
25. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2006). Word frequency effects in high dimensional co-occurrenc-emodels: A new approach. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 190-195.
26. Treiman R., Goswami U., & Bruck M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications forread-ing development and theory. Memory & Cognition. 18(6), 559-567.
27. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
28. Westbury, C., & Buchanan, L. (2002). The probability of the least likely non length-controlled bigram affects lexical decision RTs. Brain and Language, 81(1/2/3), 66-78.
29. Westbury, C., Buchanan, L., Sanderson, S., Rhemtulla, M., & and Phillips, L. (2003). Using genetic programming to discover non-linear variable interactions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35(2), 202-216.
30. Ziai, R., & Ott, N. (2005) Web as Corpus Toolkit: User’s and Hacker’s Guide. Lexical Computing Ltd., Brighton, UK. Manual for version pre3.