Critical approaches and their raison d’être: A rejoinder to Brumfit and Widdowson

International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 127-134

  Rajagopalan, Kanavillil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989396208     PISSN: 08026106     EISSN: 14734192     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1999.tb00164.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dewey, J. (1958) Experience and nature. New York : Dover.
2. Feyerabend, P. (1981) How to defend society against science. In I. Hacking, Scientific revolutions. Oxford University Press. 156–67.
3. Rajagopalan, K. (1995) Critical discourse analysis and its discontents. Working paper 72. Lancaster University.
4. Rajagopalan, K. (1998a) A verdade na/da argumentação. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos. 35: 39–48.
5. Rajagopalan, K. (1998b) On the theoretical trappings of the thesis of anti-theory; or why the idea of theory may not, after all, be all that bad: a response to Gary Thomas. Harvard Educational Review 68.3: 335–52.
6. Rajagopalan, K. (forthcoming a) Critical discourse analysis and the need for being critical all the way through. Discourse and Society.
7. Rajagopalan, K. (forthcoming b) Towards an ethically committed linguistics. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem.
8. Rampton, B. (1998) Problems with an orchestral view of applied linguistics: a reply to Widdowson. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8.1: 141–6.
9. Tarski, A. (1944) The semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4: 341–75.
10. Thomas, G. (forthcoming) Hollow theory: a reply to Rajagopalan. Harvard Educational Review.