Methodological issues in interpreting research: An introduction to the ascona workshops

Interpreting

Volumn 2, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 1-11

  Moser Mercer, Barbara ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989395529     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.2.1-2.01mos     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Armstrong, S. (1998). Corpus-based methods for NLP and translation studies. (This issue)
2. Chernov, Gh.V. (1975). The communicative situation of simultaneous interpretation and message redundancy. Tetradi Perevodchika, 12, 83-101.
3. Dollerup, C., Ceelen, L. (1996). A corpus of consecutive interpreting. Cophenhagen Studies in Translation 5. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
4. Flores d’Arcais, G.B. (1978). The contribution of cognitive psychology to the study of interpretation. In: D. Gerver & H.W. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language, interpretation and communication (pp. 385-402). New York: Plenum Press.
5. Frauenfelder, U., & Schriefers, H. (1998). A psycholinguistic perspective on simultaneous interpretation. (This issue).
6. Gemsbacher, M.A., & Shlesinger, M. (1998). The role of suppression in simultaneous interpretation. (This issue)
7. Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In Richard W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation. Applications and research (pp. 165-207). New York: Gardner Press.
8. Gerver, D., & Sinaiko, H.W. Language, interpretation and communication: An introduction to the proceedings. In D. Gerver & H.W. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language, interpretation and communication (pp. 1-4). New York: Plenum Press.
9. Gile, D. (1995). Regards sur la recherche en interpretation de conference. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
10. Grosjean, F. (1996). Living with two languages and two cultures. In I. Parasnis (Ed.), Cultural and language diversity and the deaf experience (pp. 20-37). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Grosjean, F. (1998). The bilingual individual. (This issue)
12. Hoffman, R.R. (1998). The cognitive psychology of expertise and the domain of interpreting. (This issue)
13. Isham, W.P. (1994). Memory for sentence form after simultaneous interpretation: Evidence both for and against deverbalization. In: S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the gap. Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 191-211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Lonsdale, D. (1998). Modeling cognition in SI: Methodological issues. (This issue)
15. Massaro, D.W., & Shlesinger, M. (1998). A computational approach to the study of simultaneous interpretation. (This issue)
16. Mcllvaine Parsons, H. (1978). Human factors approach to simultaneous interpretation. In: D. Gerver & H.W. Sinaiko (Eds.). Language, interpretation and communication (pp. 315-323). New York: Plenum.
17. Moser, B. (1978). Simultaneous interpreting: A hypothetical model and its practical application. In D. Gerver & W.H. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language, interpretation and communication (pp. 353-368). New York: Plenum Press.
18. Moser-Mercer, B., Kiinzli, A. & Korac. M. (1998). Prolonged turns in interpreting: Effects on quality, physiological and psychological stress. Interpreting 3(l):47-64.
19. Moser-Mercer, B., Williams, S., Dard, V., & Lambert, S. (1997). Skill components in simultaneous interpreting. In: Y. Gambier, D. Gile & C. Taylor (Eds.), Conference Interpreting - Current trends in research (pp. 133-148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Moser-Mercer, B., Frauenfelder, U., Kiinzli, A., & Casado, B. (1998). Searching to define expertise in interpreting. In K. Hyltenstam, & B. Englund-Dimitrova (Eds.), Language Processing and Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Pinker, S. (1995). Language is a human instinct. In: J. Brockman (Ed.), The third culture. Beyond the scientific revolution (pp. 223-238). New York: Simon & Schuster.
23. Sapolsky, R.M. (1994). Why zebras don’t get ulcers. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
24. Shlesinger, M. (1994). Intonation in the production and perception of simultaneous interpretation. In: S. Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.). Bridging the gap. Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation (pp. 225-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Williams, S. (1995). Observations on anomalous stress in interpreting. The Translator, 1(1), 47-64.
26. Zeier, H. (1998). Psychophysiological stress research. (This issue)