Definiteness in Czech

Studies in Language

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 567-596

  Cummins, George M ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989395518     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.22.3.03cum     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abraham, Werner. 1997. “The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the verbal genitive”. InParameters of Morphosyntactic Change, 29-61, ed. Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Adamec, Premysl. 1980. “K vyjadroväni urcenosti v cestine a v rustine”.Slovo a slovesnost4.14: 257-264.
3. Adamec, Premysl. 1983. “Ceske zäjmenotena jeho ruske ekvivalenty”. InKonfrontacm Studium ruske a ceske gramatiky a slovnizäsobyII 153-170. Prague: Univerzita Karlova.
4. Adamec, Premysl. 1988. “K vyjadroväni a rozpoznäväni koreference v rustine a cestine”. InCeskoslovenska slavistika167-177.
5. Adamec, Premysl and A. Sirokaja et al. 1981.Ucebnik cesskogo jazyka (dlja III-V kursov).Moskva: “Vyssaja skola”.
6. Barwise, J., and R. Cooper. 1981. “Generalized quantifiers and natural language”.Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159-219.
7. Bauer, J. and Grepl, M. 1975.Skladba spisovne cestiny. Prague: Stätni pedagogicke nakladatelstvi.
8. Birkenmaier, W. 1979.Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache. Studien zur nominalen Determination im Russischen. Munich.
9. Bondarko, B., et al., (eds) 1992.TeorijafunkcionaVnojgrammatiki. Sub”jek-tivnost\Ob”jektivnost\ Kommunikativnaja perspektiva vyskazyvanija.“Opredelennost’-neopredelennost”’ 232-278. St. Petersburg: Nauka. [Rossijskaja akademija nauk. Institut lingvisticeskix issledovanij.].
10. Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1976.On the generic indefinite article”.Language52.2: 427-448.
11. Carden, G. 1976.English quantifiers: logical structure and linguistic variation.New York: Academic Press.
12. Carlson, A. 1978. “A diachronic treatment of English quantifiers”.Lingua46: 295-328.
13. Carlson, G. N. 1977. “A unified analysis of the English bare plural”.Linguistics and philosophy1.3: 413-56.
14. Chesterman, Andrew. 1991.On definiteness. A study with special reference to English and Finnish.Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
15. Danes, Frantisek and Zdenek Hlavsa. 1983. “K vztahu aktuälniho cleneni a semanticke stavby vety”.Slovo a slovesnost41: 3-11.
16. Diesing, Molly. 1992.Indefinites.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
17. Dokulil, M. 1970. “O vyjadrovani jedinosti a jedinecnosti v ceskem jazyce”.Nase fee53.1:1-15.
18. Grimm, Hans-Jürgen. 1986.Untersuchungen zum Artikelgebrauch im Deutschen.Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie Leipzig.
19. Grzegorczykova, T. 1973. “Wykladniki kwantyfikaeji w polskim zdaniu”. In Zpolskich studiöw slawistycznych13-19. Warsaw.
20. Hawkins, John A. 1978.Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference andgrammaticalityprediction.London, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, Croom Helm.
21. Haegeman, Liliane. 1991.Introduction to government and binding theory.Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Hlavsa, Zdenek. 1972. “K protikladu urcenosti v cestine”.Slovo a slovestnost33.3: 199-203.
23. Hlavsa, Zdenek. 1975.Denotace objektu a jejiprostredkyvsoucasne cestine.Praha: Academie nakladatelstvi CS akademie ved.
24. Krämsky, Jiri. 1972.The article and the concept of definiteness in language.The Hague: Mouton.
25. Kresin, Susan C. 1993. “Stylistic variation in the use ofTEN”.InVarieties of Czech: studies in Czech sociolinguistics111-123, ed. Eva Eckert. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
26. Lyons, C. G. 1980. “The meaning of the English definite article”. In: Van der Auwera (ed.), The Semantics of Determiners81-95. London: Croom Helm.
27. Mathesius, V. 1926. “Pffvlastkoveten, ta, tov hovorove cestine”.Nase rec:39-41.
28. Mathesius, V. 1947.Cestina a obecny jazykozpyt.Praha.
29. Porterfield, Leslie and Veneeta Srivastav. 1988. “(In)definiteness in the absence of articles: evidence from Hindi and Indonesian. In:Proceedings of the seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics265-276. Stanford, California: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.
30. Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajicovä, and Eva Buranova. 1980.Aktudlni cleneni vetyvcestine.(= CAV, Studie a präce lingvisticke, 12.) Prague: Academia.Slovnik spisovneho jazyka ceskeho.1960. 4 vols. Bohuslav Havränek et al. (eds). Prague: NAV. [= SSJC].
31. Svoboda, Ales. 1984. “Ceskä slovoslednä posice z pohledu aktuälniho cleneni” (Part I).Slovo a slovesnost45: 22-34.
32. Sticha, Frantisek. 1993. “Informationsstruktur und Artikelgebrauch”. InSprache—Sprechen—Handeln.Akten des 28. linguistischen Kolloquiums, Graz: 187-190. Band 1. ed. Dieter W. Haiwachs and Irmgard Stütz. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.
33. Sticha, Frantisek. 1994. “Acceptability and the scope of grammar.” InThe Syntax of sentence and text, A Festschrift for Frantisek Danes, ed. Svetla Cmejrkovä and Fr. Sticha 341-357. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Philadelphia. (= vol. 42 of Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe).
34. Sticha, Frantisek. 1994. “Cas korpusove lingvistiky”.Slovo a slovesnost55: 141-145.
35. Uhlirovä, Ludmila. 1987.Knizka o slovosledu.Mala jazykovä kniznice, sv. 5. CSAV, UJC. Academie, Praha.
36. Uhlirovä, Ludmila. 1992a. “Vyjadroväni urcenosti v slovanske nominälni skupine”.Slavia61: 44-52.
37. 4ten7‘on7[0] v slovanskych jazycich (Determinätor v syntakticky samostatne posici)”.Slavia61.3: 245-254.