The role of morphological family size in word recognition a developmental perspective

Written Language and Literacy

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 45-59

  Perdijk, Kors ^a   Schreuder, Robert ^a   Verhoeven, Ludo ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989392642     PISSN: 13876732     EISSN: 15706001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/wll.8.2.05per     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baayen, R. H., T. Dijkstra and R. Schreuder. 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route modes. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 94-117.
2. Baayen, R. H., L.B. Feldman and R. Schreuder. In press. Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language.
3. Baayen, R. H., R. Lieber and R. Schreuder. 1997. The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics 35: 861-877.
4. Baayen, R. H., R. Piepenbrock and L. Gulikers. 1995. The Celex Lexical Database [CDROM]. Philadelphia, PA. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania (Distributor).
5. Balota, D. A. and J.L. Chumbley. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access: the role ofword-frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 10: 340-357.
6. Beck, I. L., M.G. Mckeown, G. M. Sinatra and J.A. Loxterman. 1991. Revising social-studies text from a text-processing perspective: evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly 26: 251-276.
7. Belsley, D.A., E. Kuh and R.E. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics, Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity [Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics]. New York: Wiley.
8. Bertram, R., R. Schreuder and H. Baayen. 2000. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 26: 489-511.
9. Bosman, A.M.T. 2005. Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students. Wrtitten Language & Literacy 8: 1-18.
10. Brysbaert, M. 1996. Word frequency affects naming latency in Dutch when age of acquisition is controlled. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 8: 185-193.
11. Burani, C., S. Marcolini and G. Stella. 2002. How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language 81: 568-586.
12. Chatterjee, S., A.S. Hadi and B. Price. 2000, Regression Analysis By Example, (3rd edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13. De Jong, N. H., R. Schreuder and R.H. Baayen. 2000. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 329-365.
14. Forster, K. I. and S. Chambers. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 627-635.
15. Forster, K. 1979. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W Cooper and E. Walker (eds), Sentence Processing Psycholinguistics studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Forster, K.I. 1989. Basic issues in lexical processing. In WMarslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process, 75-107. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
17. Grainger, J. 1990. Word-frequency and neighborhood frequency-effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language 29: 228-244.
18. Harell, F. 2001. Regression Modelling Strategies. Berlin: Springer.
19. Hyona, J. and A. Pollatsek. 1998. Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 1612-1627.
20. Jescheniak, J. D. and WJ.M. Levelt. 1994. Word-frequency effects in speech production — retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 20: 824-843.
21. Marconi, L., M. Ott, E. Pesenti, D. Ratti and M. Tavella. 1993. Lessico elementare. Dati statistici sull’italiano scritto e letto dai bambini delle elementari [Elementary lexicon: Statistical data on Italian as written and read by elementary schoolchildren]. Bologna: Zanichelli.
22. Morton, J. 1969. The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76: 165-178.
23. Oldfield, R. C. and A. Wingfield. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 273-281.
24. Reitsma, P. 1992. Invloed van leesfrequentie op fouten als teken van ontwikkeling van een orthografisch geheugen [Influence of reading frequency on errors as a sign of development of orthograpic memory]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 47: 223-234
25. Rubenstein, H., L. Garfield and J.A. Millikan. 1970. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9: 487-494.
26. Schreuder, R. and R.H. Baayen. 1995. Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, 131-154. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Schreuder, R. and R.H. Baayen. 1997. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118-139.
28. Schrooten, W. and A. Vermeer. 1994. Woorden in het basisonderwijs. 15.000 woorden aange-boden aan leerlingen [Words in elementary school. 15, 000 words presented to elementary school children] (Studies in meertaligheid 6). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
29. Taft, M. 1979. Recognition of affixed words and the word-frequency effect. Memory & Cognition 7: 263-272.