Combining corpus and experimental data

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-111

  De Mönnink, Inge ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corpus data; Data cycle; Elicitation data; Floating postmodification; Intuitive data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989390012     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.4.1.05mon     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aarts, F. 1971. “On the Distribution of Noun-Phrase Types in English Clause-Structure.” Lingua 26: 281-293.
2. Aarts, F. and J. Aarts. 1982. English Syntactic Structures. Functions and Categories in Sentence Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon, Bohn, Scheltema and Holkema. 2nd edition, 1988. New York and Leiden: Prentice-Hall and Nijhoff.
3. Aarts, J. 1991. “Intuition-based and Observation-based Grammars.” English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, ed. by K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg, 44-62. London: Longman.
4. Aarts, J. 1995. “Corpus Analysis.” Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J. Verschueren, J. Östman and J. Blommaert, 565-570. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
5. Biber, D. 1990. “Methodological Issues Regarding Corpus-based Analysis of Linguistic Variation.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 5: 257-69.
6. Biber, D. 1993. “Representativeness in Corpus Design.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 243-57.
7. Biber, D. and E. Finegan. 1986. “An Initial Typology of English Text Types.” Corpus Linguistics II. New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora, ed. by J. Aarts and W. Meijs, 19-46. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
8. Bunt, H. 1996, “Discontinuous Constituency: Introduction.” Discontinuous Constituency, ed. by H. Bunt and A. von Horck, 1-10. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Chaudron, C. 1983. “Research on Metalinguistic Judgments: A Review of Theory, Methods, and Results.” Language Learning 33: 343-377.
10. Fillmore, C. 1992. “Corpus Linguistics” or “Computer-aided Armchair Linguistics.” Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82. Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, ed. J. Svartvik, 35-60. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Greenbaum, S. 1973. “Informant Elicitation of Data on Syntactic Variation.” Lingua 31: 201-212.
12. Greenbaum, S. 1976. “Contextual Influence on Acceptability Judgements.” Linguistics 187: 5-11.
13. Greenbaum, S. 1984. “Corpus Analysis and Elicitation Tests.” Corpus Linguistics. Recent Developments in the Use of Computer Corpora in English Language Research, ed. by J. Aarts and W. Meijs, 193-201. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
14. Greenbaum, S. 1988. “A Proposal for an International Corpus of English.” World Englishes 1: 315.
15. Greenbaum, S. and R. Quirk. 1970. Elicitation Experiments in English Linguistic Studies in Use and Attitude. London: Longman.
16. de Haan, P. 1987. “Exploring the Linguistic Database: Noun Phrase Complexity and Language Variation.” Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, ed. by W. Meijs, 151-165. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
17. de Haan, P. 1992. “The Optimum Corpus Sample Size?” New Directions in English Language Corpora, ed. by G. Leitner, 3-19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. van Halteren, H. and T. van den Heuvel. 1990. Linguistic Exploitation of Syntactic Databases. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
19. Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge Mass./London: The MIT Press.
20. de Mönnink, I. 1997. “Using Corpus and Experimental Data: a Multi-method Approach.” Corpus-based studies in English, ed. by M. Ljung, 227-244. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
21. Nagata, H. 1989. “Judgments of Sentence Grammaticality and Field-dependence of Subjects.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 69: 739-747.
22. Oostdijk, N. 1988a. “A Corpus Linguistic Approach to Linguistic Variation.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 3: 12-25.
23. Oostdijk, N. 1988b. “A Corpus for Studying Linguistic Variation.” ICAME Journal 12: 3-14.
24. Oostdijk, N. 1991. Corpus Linguistics and the Automatic Analysis of English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
25. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
26. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
27. Quirk, R. and J. Svartvik. 1966. Investigating Linguistic Acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.
28. Quirk, R. and J. Svartvik 1979. “A Corpus of Modem English.” Empirische Textwissenschaft. Aufbau und Auswertung von Textcorpora, ed. by H. Bergenholtz and B. Schaeder, 204-218. Koenigstein: Scriptor.
29. Schafer, A., J. Carter, C. Clifton Jr and L. Frazier. 1996. “Focus in Relative Clause Construal.” Language and Cognitive Processes 11 (1/2): 135-163.
30. Schütze, C. 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31. Shohamy, E. 1996. “Competence and Performance in Language Testing.” Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition, ed. by G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer and J. Williams, 138-151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.