Ecological content

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 253-281

  Toribio, Josefa ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989382571     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.5.2.04tor     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abraham, R.H. and Shaw, C.D. 1992. Dynamics. The Geometry of Behavior, 2nd ed. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Ackley, D. and Littman, M. 1992. “Interactions between learning and evolution”. In C. Langton, C. Taylor, D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds), Artificial Life II, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 487-509.
3. Ballard, D. 1991. “Animate vision”. Artificial Intelligence 48: 57-86.
4. Beer, R. 1990. Intelligence and Adaptive Behavior. San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Bingham, G. P. 1995. “Dynamics and the problem of visual event recognition”. In R. F. Port and T. van Gelder (eds), Mind as Motion. Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 403-448.
6. Block, N. 1986. “Advertisement for a semantics for psychology”. In P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 10: Studies in the Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 615-678.
7. Block, N. 1991. “What narrow content is not”. In B. Loewer and G. Rey (eds), Meaning and Mind. Fodorand His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 33-64.
8. Brooks, R. 1991. “Intelligence without representation”. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139-159.
9. Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the mental”. In P. French et. al. (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume 4. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 73-121.
10. Burge, T. 1986. “Individualism and psychology”. The Philosophical Review 95: 3-45.
11. Burge, T. 1993. “Mind-body causation in psychology”. In J. Heil and A. Mele (eds), Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 97-120.
12. Churchland, P.S., Ramachandran, V.S. and Sejnowski, T.J. 1994. “A critique of pure vision”. In C. Koch and J. Davis (eds), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 23-60.
13. Clark, A. 1997. Being There. Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14. Clark, A. Forthcoming. “Embodied, situated and distributed cognition”. In W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds), Companion to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Clark, A. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1993. “The cognizer’s innards”. Mind and Language 8(4): 487-519.
16. Cussins, A. 1992. “Content, embodiment and objectivity: The theory of cognitive trails”. Mind, 101: 651-688.
17. Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. Dummett, M. 1973. Frege. Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
19. Dummett, M. 1975. “What is a theory of meaning? (I)”. In S. Guttenplan (ed), Mind and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 97-138.
20. Dummett, M. 1976. “What is a theory of meaning? (II)”. In G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds), Truth and Meaning. Essays in Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 67-137.
21. Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Ed. by J. McDowell. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York, Thomas Y. Crowell.
23. Fodor, J. 1981. “Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology”. Reprinted in J. Fodor, Representations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 225-253.
24. Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25. Fodor, J. 1994. The Elm and the Expert. Mentalese and Its Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26. Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. 1992. Holism. A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Frege, G. 1892. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung”. In Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, NF 100, 1892. Trans, in M. Black and P. Geach (eds): Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952.
28. Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29. Harvey, I., Husbands, P., and Cliff, D. 1993. “Issues in evolutionary robotics”. Sussex: University of Sussex. Cognitive Science Research Papers, TR 219.
30. Haugeland, J. 1995. “Mind embodied and embedded”. In Mind and Cognition: Collected Papers from 1993 International Symposium on Mind and Cognition. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, 3-37.
31. Hinton, G.E. and Nowland, S.J. 1987. “How learning can guide evolution”. Complex Systems 1: 495-502.
32. Homsby, J. 1986. “Physicalist thinking and conceptions of behaviour”. In P. Pettit and J. McDowell (eds), Subject, Thought and Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 95-115.
33. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34. Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1986. “From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s meta-linguistic and repair data”. Cognition 23: 95-147.
35. Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1992. Beyond Modularity. A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36. Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. 1993. “Some content is narrow”. In J. Heil (ed), Mentat Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 259-282.
37. Kim, J. 1984. “Epiphenomenal and supervenient causation”. In P. French et. al. (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 9. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 257-270.
38. Kim, J. 1996. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Kirsh, D. 1995. ‘The intelligent use of space”. Artificial Intelligence 72: 1-52.
40. Kirsh, D. and Maglio, P. 1994. “On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action”. Cognitive Science 18: 513-549.
41. Lewis, D. 1994. “Reduction of mind”. In S. Guttenplan (ed), Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 412-431.
42. Loar, B. 1988. “Social content and psychological content”. In R.H. Grimm and D. Merrill (eds), Contents of Thought. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 99-110.
43. McClamrock, R. 1995. Existential Cognition, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44. McGinn, C. 1982. “The structure of content”. In A. Woodfield (ed), Thought and Object. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 207-258.
45. Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46. Millikan, R. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Nusbaum, H. and DeGroot, J. 1991. “The role of syllables in speech perception”. In M.S. Ziolkowski, M. Noske and K. Deaton (eds), Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 287-317
48. Papineau, D. 1990. “Truth and tleology”. In D. Knowles (ed), Explanation and Its Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21-43.
49. Peacocke, C. 1992. “Scenarios, cncepts and prception”. In T. Crane (ed), The Contents of Experience. Essay on Perception. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 105-135.
50. Peacocke, C. 1993. “Externalist eplanation”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCIII: 203-230.
51. Peacocke, C. 1994. “Content, computation and etemalism”. Mind and Language 9(3): 303-335.
52. Port, R.F. and van Gelder, T. (eds) 1995. Mind as Motion. Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53. Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of «meaning»”. In H. Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215-271
54. Rutkowska, J.C. 1990. “Action, connectionism and enaction: A developmental perspective”. Aland Society 4: 96-114.
55. Rutkowska, J.C. 1991. “Looking for «constraints» in infants’ perceptual-cognitive development”. Mind and Language 6: 215-238.
56. Rutkowska, J.C. 1993a. “Ontogenetic constraints on scaling-up sensory-motor systems”. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Artificial Life, Vol. 2. Brussels, 970-979.
57. Rutkowska, J.C. 1993b. The Computational Infant. Brighton: Harvester Press.
58. Ryle, G. 1963. The Concept of Mind. Harmonds worth: Penguin.
59. Searle, J.R. 1979. “Literal meaning”. In J.R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117-161.
60. Segal, G. 1991. “Defence of a reasonable individualism”. Mind 100: 485-494.
61. Simon, H.A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (2nd ed., 1987).
62. Stalnaker, R. 1990. “Narrow content”. In C.A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds), Proposi-tional Attitudes. The Role of Content in Logic, Language and Mind. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 131-145.
63. Thelen, E. and Smith, L. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
64. Toribio, J. Forthcoming. “Twin pleas: Probing content and compositionality”. Philosophical and Phenomenological Research.
65. Turvey, M.T. and Carello, C. 1995. “Some dynamical themes in perception and ation”. In Port and van Gelder (eds), 373-401.
66. Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
67. White, S. 1982. “Partial character and the language of thought”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63: 347-365.
68. Wilson, R. A. 1994a. “Wide computationalism”. Mind 103: 351-372.
69. Wilson, R. A. 1994b. “Causal depth, theoretical appropriateness, and individualism in psychology”. Philosophy of Science 61: 55-75.