Relative orientation in sign language phonology

Linguistics in the Netherlands

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 37-48

  Crasborn, Onno ^a   Kooij, Els Van Der ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989380209     PISSN: 09297332     EISSN: 15699919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/avt.14.06cra     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Battison, R. (1978) Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language, Linstok Press, Silver Spring, MD.
2. Battison, R., H. Markowicz and J. Woodward (1975) ‘A Good Rule of Thumb: Variable Phonology in American Sign Language’, in R.W. Fasold and R.W. Shuy, Analyzing Variation in Language, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
3. Blees, M., O. Crasbom, H. van der Hulst and E. van der Kooij (1996) ‘SignPhon: a Database Tool for Phonological Analysis of Sign Languages. Manual, Version 0.1’, ms., Leiden University.
4. Bos, H.F. (1993) ‘Agreement and Pro-drop in Sign Language of the Netherlands’, in K. Hengeveld and F. Drijkoningen, eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993, Foris, Dordrecht.
5. Brennan, M. (1990) Word Formation in British Sign Language, University of Stockholm, Stockholm.
6. Brentari, D. (1990) Theoretical Foundations of American Sign Language Phonology, PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
7. Brentari, D., H. van der Hulst, E. vna der Kooij and W. Sandler (1996) ‘One over All and All over One’, poster presented at TISLR 5, Montreal, September 1996.
8. Corina, D. and W. Sandler (1993) ‘On the Nature of Phonological Structure in Sign Language’, Phonology 10, 165-207.
9. Crasbom, O. (1995) An Articulatory View on Two-handed Signs, MA Dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
10. Crasbom, O. (1996) ‘Asymmetries of Time in Sign Language Phonology: Alternatives for [alternating]’, in J. Costa, R. Goedemans and R. van de Vijver, eds., Proceedings of ConSOLE 4, Paris, SOLE, Leiden.
11. Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993) Space in Danish Sign Language: the Semantics and Morphosyntax of the Use of Space in a Visual Language, Signum Verlag, Hamburg.
12. Friedman, L.A. (1976) Phonology of a Soundless Language: Phonological Structure of the American Sign Language, PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
13. Greftegreff, I. (1992) ‘Orientation in Indexical Signs in Norwegian Sign Language’, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 15, 159-182.
14. Hulst, H. van der (1993) ‘Units in the Analysis of Signs’, Phonology 10, 209-241.
15. Hulst, H. van der (1995) ‘Dependency Relations in the Phonological Representation of Signs’, in H. Bos and T. Schermer, eds., Sign Language Research 1994, Signum Press, Hamburg.
16. Hulst, H. van der (1996) ‘On the Other Hand’, Lingua 98, 121-143.
17. Klima, E. and U. Bellugi (1979) The Signs of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. KOMVA (1989) Basis-gebarenschat: een Beknopt Gebarenwoordenboek, NSDSK, Amsterdam.
19. KOMVA (1993) Gevoelsgebaren uit de Nederlandse Gebarentaal, Van Tricht, Twello.
20. Kooij, E. van der (1996) ‘End Contact Signs’, in J. Costa, R. Goedemans and R. van de Vijver, Proceedings of ConSOLE 4, Paris, SOLE, Leiden.
21. Kooij, E. van der (1997) ‘Contact: a Phonological or a Phonetic Feature of Signs?’, this volume.
22. Kooij, E. van der and O. Crasbom (1996) ‘Attitude Problems’, poster presented at TISLR 5, Montreal, Sept. 1996.
23. Liddell, S.K. (1990) ‘Four Functions of Locus: Reexamining the Structure of Space in SL‘, in C. Lucas, ed., Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues.
24. Liddell, S.K. (1995)’Real, Surrogate, and Token Space: Grammatical Consequences in ASL’, in K. Emmorey and J. Reilly, eds., Language, Gesture, and Space, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
25. Liddell, S.K. and R.E. Johnson (1989) ‘American Sign Language: the Phonological Base’, Sign Language Studies 64, 195-278.
26. Lindblom, B. (1990) ‘Explaining Phonetic Variation: a Sketch of the H&H Theory’, in W.J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal, eds., Speeech Production and Speech Modelling, Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht.
27. Mandel, M.A. (1977) ‘Iconic Devices in American Sign Language’, in L.A. Friedman, ed., On the Other Hand: New Perspectives on American Sign Language, Academic Press, New York.
28. Mandel, M.A. (1981) Phonotactics and Morphophonology in American Sign Language, PhD Dissertation, UC Berkeley.
29. Mandel, M.A. (1982) ‘Major Information about a ‘Minor Parameter’: Point of Contact in Sign Language Phonology’, BLS8, 533-549.
30. Meir, I. (1995) ‘Explaining Backwards Verbs in ISL: Syntactic-Semantic Interaction’, in H. Bos and T. Schermer, Sign Language Research 1994, Signum, Hamburg.
31. Pierrehumbert, J. (1990) ‘Phonological and Phonetic Representation’, Journal of Phonetics 18, 375-394.
32. Poizner, H., U. Bellugi and R. Tweeney (1981) ‘Processing of Formational, Semantic and Iconic Information in American Sign Language’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1, 1146-1159.
33. Sandler, W. (1989) Phonological Representation of the Sign: Linearity and Nonlinearity in American Sign Language, Foris, Dordrecht.
34. Sandler, W. (1995) ‘One Phonology or Two? Sign Language and Phonological Theory’, Glot International 1, 3-8.
35. Stokoe, W.C. (1978) Sign language structure, Linstok Press, Silver Spring, MD.
36. Taub, S. (1996) ‘Analogue Building: a New Model of Linguistic Iconicity’, Poster presented at TISLR 5, Montreal, Sept. 1996.
37. Uyechi, L. (1995) The Geometry of Visual Phonology, PhD dissertation, Stanford University.