Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers

Studies in Language

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 313-368

  Aristar, Anthony R ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989377727     PISSN: 03784177     EISSN: 15699978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/sl.21.2.04ari     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. In progress. The traditional analysis of case and split case-marking.
2. Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1996. The relationship between dative and locative: Kurylowicz’s argument from a typological perspective. Dia-chronica 13:207-224.
3. Battistella, Edwin L. 1990. Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: State University of New York Press.
4. Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
5. Burrow, Thomas. 1970. The Pengo language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Chatterji, Suniti Kumar. 1970. The origin and development of the Bengali language. London: George Allen and Unwin.
7. Comrie, Bernard. 1977. “Subjects and direct objects in Uralic languages: a functional explanation of case-marking systems”. Etudes Finno-Ougriennes 12:5-17.
8. Comrie, Bernard. 1979. “Definite and animate direct objects: a natural class”. Linguistica Silesiana 3:13-21.
9. Comrie, Bernard. 1986a. “Markedness, grammar, people and the world”. In: Eckman, Fred R.; Moravcsik, Edith A., and Wirth, Jessica A. (eds), Markedness, 85-106. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Comrie, Bernard. 1986b. “On delimiting cases”. In: Brecht, R. D. and Levine, J.S. (eds), Case in Slavic, 86-105. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
11. Comrie, Bernard. 1991. “Form and function in identifying cases”. In: Plank, Frans (ed.), Paradigms: The economy of inflection, 41-56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Croft, William. 1988. “Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects”. In: Barlow, M., and Ferguson, C. (eds), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions, 159-80. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
13. Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. DeLancey, Scott. 1981. “An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns”. Language 57:626-57.
15. Derbyshire, D.C. 1984. Hixkaryana. London: Croom Helm.
16. De Rijk, Rudolf P.G. 1972. “Relative clauses in Basque: a guided tour”. The Chicago which hunt. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
17. Dietze, J. 1973. “Die Entwicklung der altrussischen Kategorie der Beseelt-heid im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert”. Zeitschriftfiir Slawistik 18:261-272.
18. Dillmann, August. 1974. Ethiopic grammar. Amsterdam: Philo Press.
19. Dixon, R.M.W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge.
20. Dixon, R.M.W. 1977. A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. “Ergativity”. Language 55. 59-138.
22. Dixon, R.M.W. 1980. The Languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Douglas, Wilfred H. 1981. “Watjarri”. In: Dixon, R.M.W., and Blake, Barry (eds), Handbook of Australian languages, 196-274. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
24. Eades, Diana K. 1979. “Gumbaynggir”. In: Dixon, R.M.W., and Blake, Barry (eds), Handbook of Australian languages, 245-361. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
25. Erwin, Wallace M. 1963. A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
26. Gowda, K. Kushalappa. 1968. Gender distinctions in Gowda-Kannada. Poona: Centres of Advanced Studies in Linguistics.
27. Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
28. Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. “The relation of frequency to semantic feature in a case language (Russian)”. Working Papers in Language Universals 16:21-47.
29. Haas, Mary. 1946. “A grammatical sketch of Tunica”. In: Hoijer, Harry (ed.), Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking fund.
30. Haiman, John. 1985. Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Halpem, A.M. 1946. “Yuman”. In: Hoijer, Harry (ed.), Linguistic structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund.
32. Heath, Jeffrey. 1981. Basic materials in Mara: Grammar, texts and dictionary. Canberra, Australia: The Australian National University.
33. Heine, Bemd; Claudi, Ulrike, et al. 1991. Grammaticalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Hershberger, Henry. 1964. “Case-marking affixes in Gugu-Yalandji”. Papers on the languages of the Australian Aborigines. 73-82. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
35. Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse”. Language 56:251-299.
36. Israel, M. 1979. A grammar of the Kuvi language. Madurai: Dravidian Linguistics Association.
37. Jakobson, Roman. 1936. “Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamt-bedeutungen der russischen Kasus”. Selected Writings. 23-71. The Hague: Mouton.
38. Kuryfowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
39. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and other dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago.
40. Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “The syntax of prepositions in Uto-Aztecan”. International Journal of American Linguistics 43:11-26.
41. Lehmann, Christian. 1983. Rektion und syntaktische Relationen. Folia Linguistica 17:339-378.
42. Luraghi, Silvia. 1990. Old Hittite sentence structure. London: Croom Helm.
43. Mallinson, G. and Blake, Barry J. 1981. Language typology. New York: North Holland.
44. Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Matisoff, James A. 1982. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. McClendon, Sally. 1975. A grammar of Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. McClendon, Sally. 1978. “Ergativity, case, and transitivity in Eastern Pomo”. International Journal of American Linguistics 44:1-9.
48. McKaughan, Howard. 1973. The languages of the eastern family of the East New Guinea highland stock. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
49. Minassian, Martiros. 1980. Grammaire d’armenien oriental. Delmar, New York: Caravan.
50. Minn, E.K. 1967. “Contrast of animate vs. inanimate in the Finno-Ugric case systems”. Actes du congres international des linguistes 72:371-374.
51. Morgenstieme, Georg. 1947. “Some features of Khowar morphology”. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 14:5-28.
52. Morphy, Frances. 1983. “Djapu”. In: Dixon, R.M.W., and Blake, Barry (eds), Handbook of Australian languages. 1-187. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
53. Palmer, Leonard R. 1954. The Latin language. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
54. Radden, Gunter. 1985. “Spatial metaphors underlying prepositions of causality”. In: Paprotte, Wolf, and Dirven, Rene (eds), The Ubiquity of Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. “Natural categories”. Cognitive Psychology 4:328-350.
56. Rosch, Eleanor. 1975a. “Cognitive representations of semantic categories”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104:192-233.
57. Rosch, Eleanor. 1975b. “Cognitive reference points”. Cognitive Psychology 7:532-547.
58. Rosch, Eleanor. 1981. “Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems”. In: Scholnick (ed.), New trends in cognitive representation: Challenges to Piagets theory. 73-86. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Schebeck, Bernhard. 1976. “Thangu and Atjnjamathanh”. In: Dixon, R.M.W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 516-550. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
60. Schiffman, Harold F. 1983. A reference grammar of Kannada. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
61. Scott, Graham. 1978. The Fore language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University.
62. Shackle, C. 1972. Punjabi. London: English Universities Press.
63. Shapiro, Michael. 1983. The sense of grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
64. Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Hierarchy of features and ergativity”. In: Dixon, R.M.W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112-171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
65. Silverstein, Michael. 1981. “Case-marking and the nature of language”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1:227-247.
66. Sohn, Ho-min. 1973. A Ulithian grammar. Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Pacific Studies.
67. Starke, Frank. 1977. Die Funktionen der dimensionalen Kasus und Adverbien im Althethitischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
68. Taylor, John R. 1989. Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69. Tiersma, Peter Meijes. 1982. “Local and general markedness”. Language 58:832-849.
70. Timberlake, Alan. 1975. “Hierarchies in the genitive of negation”. Slavic and East European Journal 1 19:123-138.
71. Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1974. A grammar of the Waruqu language. MA dissertation, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
72. Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1978. The Djaru language of Kimberley, western Australia. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Australian National University.
73. Welmers, William. 1976. A grammar of Vai. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
74. Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1946. “The Hopi language, Toreva dialect”. In: Hoijer, Harry (ed.), Linguistic Structures of Native America. New York: Viking Fund.
75. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1981. “Case-marking and human nature”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1:43-81.